Malala Yousuf zai has been attacked by the pakistani millitants. what was her sin?
she was striving to promote education among the girls of pakistan and was peacefully working as a social worker. we salute Malala yousuf zai with two hands and pray for her health. May she live long.
we demand from governmnet of pakistan to eliminate these millitants who are destroying the peace of pakistan and the nation.

please come with relevant comments regarding this issue.

I don't know why Media has created a hype only for Malala Yousufzai?
Everyday many girls aged same like Malala die in Drone attacks. None of them has been highlighted. Many fathers, mothers, sons, daughters and wives die in Drone attacks. Quite contradictory actions by Government and Pakistani Media.
Many others die due to poor health facilities in Pakistani hospitals. None of them is highlighted as much as Malala. Malala has been sent abroad by Government but why other Pakistanis are not sent? Malala is daughter of nation then what others are? Other girls are not daughters of nation?

__________________
No matter how fast i run or how far i go it wont escape me, pain, misery, emptiness.

Your argument is rather childish and akin to saying that we shouldn't have given any attention to the Salala incident because soldiers die everyday (most recent was the killing of an SP and several FC personnel).

Secondly, I see that you have mentioned drone attacks, but not attacks by militants. I don't know if this was intetntional or if it was, I have no idea if you are a supporter of the TTP or just like to bash the United States, but please consider that militant attacks have claimed almost 40,000 (many, many more than have been killed in drone strikes) lives in the last decade. Moreover, many of the perpetrators have been killed in drone attacks, among them Qari Hussain (the architect of suicide bombing in Pak) and Baitullah Mehsud.

Moving on, a lot of people are questioning the attention being given to Malala and I'll try to explain the situation to the best of my abilities. First, the act of specifically targeting a 14 year old for speaking out against the Taliban shows the perverted mindset of the attackers and is a clear indication of what the future will hold if their power is allowed to go unchecked. Second, this attack shows the weakness of the security agencies in that the act was carried out without resistance in a area that has supposedly been cleared of militants.

The Taliban have clearly shown that they intend to impose their will and their perverted view of religion on the people of Pakistan by force. In fact, this much was clear even before the attack on Malala, but this particular incident should be a wake up call for all who are still sleeping.

You can either have Quaid E Azam's Pakistan or you can have the Taliban's Pakistan, not both.

I did not start my arguments yet because there is nothing to argument in this issue.
This is our Government and this is our media.
We the people are just the puppets.
Wherever the media and Government drive our attention, we get driven.
We just have questions, lots of them and we don't get answers.

We discuss many issues on the forums over which we have no control so I don't think there's any harm in discussing this too

Now we the weaker souls are reluctant to
believe how a little school going girl
embodies those very virtues which are
anathema to the taliban.............hence
conspiracy theories and beating about the
bush
malala is a symbol of defiance against
midieval jingoistic militancy and illiterate
ritualistic stubborn orthodoxy.

most of da questions in life have very simple
answerz .......but we are in a habit of
complicating and confusing
things ........always bent upon believing or
tend to believe on conspiracy
theories ......they look grave and serious . TTP
claims responsibility of this killing on a
symbol of education and enlightenment,r
esilience and resistance,the symbols they
have been attacking since long.

No one here condemns malala, but we condemn the purpose. I have seen in your previous posts at another thread that you only see what it is, and not what are the causes and what it should have been. We all condemn the attack on her.

If you are wanted by police and police attacks your house and kills every member of your family just to kill you, is this justified in any law? To kill one, you sacrifice all. Do you agree that it should be done like drones do?

Why america is not interested in capturing alqaida and taliban leaders alive? If they are arrested alive, they can give more fruitful information. right? They can give information to our forces and our forces are able to capture them alive if they are present. But they will not do so. Because it will end their fake war on terror (originally war of energy resources).

With all due respect to malala and her family, they were used, used by america and our rulers to incite army to start operation. I wish her best wishes for her life. (TTP is just local contractor of CIA and RAW). Was Malala an intellectual or a genius? No. she was just praised by hillary clinton. That is why so much coverage is given to her and air ambulance was available for malala and not for late Arfa Kareem Randhawa, being in critical condition for continuous 26 days and she was given coverage on the day she was about to die. She was not praised by hillary, she was praised by IT geniuses. So no one gave importance to her.

You are quoting the lines said by a coward murderer, chief of strongest party in Karachi, who thinks creation of Pakistan is blunder. Just trying to defame the personality of Quaid e Azam. According to them Quaid e Azam was socialist. How can he even try to suggest us what is better for Pakistan and what is not. So speak, what you know, and not what is told by media and you get inspired.

You can further elaborate us what do you mean by saying Quaid`s Pakistan or Taliban`s Pakistan. I will be pleased to know your views

Did I say that I support the way its being done? I strongly condemn civilian causalities, but I'm also not blind to the fact that many militants, responsible for the deaths of hundreds of people have been killed in drone strikes. Its not a black and white situation.

Because they can't. You think top militant leaders are sitting ducks?

This is the typical attitude of Pakistanis who are in denial and unable to accept the responsibility for their own actions. Please elaborate on exactly why you think the TTP is an agent of the CIA and what the US hopes to achieve through it. BTW, you are contradicting yourself here. If the TTP is an agent of the US and RAW, whats wrong with an operation against it? Or do you plan on ceding half the country to these agents of CIA/RAW?


Altaf Hussain is all that you say he is and more. He is one of the people responsible for the continuous bloodbath in Karachi and I've never ever been a fan of the man, but this time he's right: you can either have Quaid-E-Azam's Pakistan or the Taliban's.

I have my own opinions on what the Quaid would have wanted, but since they won't be acceptable to most people, lets just say that in the Quaid's Pakistan, a bunch of gun-wielding religious zealots will not run the show. Or do you think that the Quaid would have welcomed an insurgency by religious extremists, blowing people up in markets, attacking army bases, shooting 14 year olds, etc etc?

Do you what the word "cause" means? If you kill 100, does that justify to kill 1000 innocent neighbors for killing just you? They(TTP) are responsible for killings, but what is the justification to bomb a place when you are not even sure of presence of a terrorist? The only thing is to confirm it first if you want to bomb. If you live in that area, and you are innocent, how would you feel if any moment that drone strikes your house and kills your family members? Compare how many innocents killed and how many terrorists killed?

So you are justifying drones to attack a place just to make sure the target is killed no matter civilian or terrorist. You don`t even have concern with sovereignty of the state.

They have already been operated upon and cleared. Do you justify operation for just malala attack? Such killings are being done everyday in whole Pakistan. And no TTP stronghold exists in those places where america is pointing. I will make it more clear because you are unable to understand quickly or even lately Why TTP was not present before america invaded? Why Taliban will go against Pakistan when they were living happily in Afghanistan before america attacked? Americans knew that they are hated in Pakistan so they bought these talibans so that they can perform americans duty easily. Do you think america is a well wisher of Pakistan? It is that very country that was unable to swallow that Pakistan a Muslim country had become a nuclear power. It is that very country that sent soya beans instead of F-16 even after payment. It is that very country that sent an on paper naval fleet in Indo Pak War to help Pakistan. Army needs to take care for external borders. As far as internal terrorism is concerned, only efficient police can handle this because no major TTP strongholds are present and only some gangsters who claim to be as TTP are working but that is headache of police. Police is responsible for such gangs.


Definitely Quaid would have wanted a peaceful Pakistan free for all sects, but without any diversion from basics of ISLAM. Did Taliban attacked any mosque or religious gathering place of any sect or religion before american came to Afghanistan? No. these TTP agents are no Muslims and they don`t represent Afghan Taliban, created especially to destabilize Pakistan. And please be open to recognize friends and foes. America will never leave Afghanistan on its own. If you wanna give Iraq example, then situation is entirely different here.