|
Share Thread: Facebook Twitter Google+ |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Was Nts under-dictated ..?
We'll , the test started off with intelligence portion , for which the given time was 30 mins ; anyone who reads the question first can do no more than 60 questions, despite hims/her being an ace , when it comes to intelligence . Nothing to my surprise , the intelligence test was of both verbal and non-verbal nature . Second came the personality assessment , for which the given time was 15 min . Personality test was succeeded by word association. Word association had three sub-portion: English sentences , Urdu sentences , and sentences that were flashed on screen for 10 time . The subjects were supposed to sum it all in 30 min. Decicated time for picture stories was 9 min . For character assesment part 6 min were given . Well! I'm no conspiracy theorist , but if you sum it all , the final product we obtain is 1hr and 30 hr . While the decdiated time for redundancies like orientation by the host behind rostem should have ideally been no more than 15 min . If we add these 15 min pre-summed figure , it still falls shorts by 15 min . Which , I believe , was the time imputed for non-verbal section of test
Feel free to express , if you believe to the contrary. And maybe! I'm over-analyzing the situation , as I didn't do well in intelligence test P.s I'd love to hear if someone believes otherwise , and everybody endured the same as was endured by the subjects, called at Anbala school , Sargodha . |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Actually it is way the intellihence tests are conducted. The things u do under pressure and in short time reflect ur real personality. If they give us ample time then we may fabricate our personality to be a positive one.
No issue with the way how they conducted it. Sent from my Genius_G5 using Tapatalk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
intelligence tests are taken in a short time but not so short that you don't have even time to read the statement. Moreover, in my opinion army dont want extra intelligent. What they want is a mediocre whom they can fix in their machinery. Very short time is for sentence completion, word association, story writing, so that one doesn't fabricate.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
...Desertsmile
How one can see the intelligence of a person if that person is not even given the time to read all the questions, let alone answering them. It was impossible to give answers of more than 75 questions except tukkaas. then what type of intelligence they were looking for? You can not judge a batsman or a bowler from just one over. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I think 45 plus is a safe score in IQ test
My dear friends,
Why you are so worried about not attempting all the questions? If they gave 30 minutes for 100 questions, they must be realizing the fact that nobody can answer all the questions. As a student of psychology I know that there must be range, may be 25-35, 36-45, 46-55, 56-65 and 65 and above would have been the ranges for the assessment of intelligence. If you have attempted more than 45 questions right, I believe you are safe in intelligence test. People here say that they attempted 70 questions without fail are just giving tensions to others. I bet nobody can answer 70 Questions without fail in that test because you have 18 seconds in which you have to read the statement, think/calculate, see all the options and then fill the circles. No mayi ka laalcan be so efficient that have attempted 70 questions correctly in 30 minutes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Tuka-test
The parameters set by assessing intelligence were preposterous...It was more like a Tuka-Test...Had wrong answers carried negative marks(ing) then the variables in the intelligence equation would have no errors...
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
No negative marking.
|
|
|