Can anyone help in solving the following Q
Examine the difficulties in the establishment of an Islamic Order in Pakistan after independence.

Elucidate the difficulties in establishment of an Islamic order
Through AllamaIqbal’s writings and views of Quaid-i-Azam explain their conceptual understanding about the Islamic state. Do you agree that their vision found some place while explaining the constitutional developments throughout the case of Pakistan’s political history?
Islamic ideology has failed to produce an Islamic pakistan . Elucidate

Quaid, too, like Iqbal believed that the Quran could be a complete source of
inspiration for the Muslims to help them guide their life according to the true spirit
of Islam. However, the Quran was to be interpreted rationally and scientifically
which could only be done by the scholars, jurists and enlightened moderates. The
Quaid distinctly differentiated between an Islamic social democracy and the
theocracy and stated categorically that Pakistan would not be a theocratic state
where the lives of the people would be entrusted to a few ‘custodians’ of religion
who could impose their own brand of Islam on the masses

This is what Pakistan was created for - a country to be ruled in accordance with the
Islamic injunctions for the amelioration of the economically and socially down-
trodden Muslims of pre-partition India, and not to save Islam or impose Islam of a
specific brand and breed, embroiling the masses in trivialities such as, how long
should one’s beard be, or at what height the paincha of the shalwar should be, or
could a woman work in an office along with male workers? Islam is much above
such petty matters. And the Quaid wanted Islam of all ages, an Islam interpreted in
the light of the modern, scientific and technological age. An Islam emancipating
the masses and opening to them vistas of the modern and fruitful advancement they
could make use of and play their important role in the comity of nations

Iqbal leaned heavily upon Ijma – collective opinion. Ijma not necessarily by the
Ulema, the scholars and the jurists alone but also by the common people, albeit
masters of their subjects and fields. It is simply not possible for an Aalim-e-Deen
[mostly a scholar from a madrassah] to be able to interpret and apply the all
encompassing Quranic injunctions to the present day highly developed scientific
and technological knowledge


Had the Pakistan movement had any religious overtones, why would almost all
Ulema oppose it, or call its leader Kafir-e-Azam? It is yet another matter that most
of them chose to stay behind and did not migrate to the ‘Land of the Pure’ till after
quite some time after its inception, till they found the opportune time to do so. The
potent power of the pulpit was used methodically to project the partition as a war
between Kufr and Islam. Had Jinnah's ideals been held sacred, his speech of
August 11, 1947 should have received the status of our Magna Carta

After the early demise of charismatic leadership no leader came to the fore who
could have understood the real islamic vision of Quaid and Iqbal and then unite the
nation to implement the same vision of islamic social democracy.To be sure
upcoming leaders were either slave to their whimsical desires or too afraid to face
the domestic opposition. Moreover the unsatble condition of the country never allowed leaders to overhaul the political social and econmic system and alighn
with the ideals of Iqbal and Quaid.
In constitution the Vision of Iqbal and Quaid found some place but never
implemeted practiaclly.True islamic ideology was never implemented so we cant
complain that ideology didn’t produce islamic Pakisatan.Moreover owing to
continous neglect and misgovernace of our leaders the Ethno-linguistice identity
trumpped the religious identity.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk