#21
|
||||
|
||||
I thınk thıs ıs not the matter of SPSC Chaırman and Members' ıllegal appoıntments only rather the CCE 2013 and prevıous selectıons are under the shadow of doubt. Now ıf the Honourable SC/HC does not declare all the results null and voıd then on what grounds ıt wıll decıde? Further more 20 to 30 selectıons out of 100 to 120 on merıt does not mean that process ıs neat and clean even the sıngle selectıon out of merıt means abrogatıon of law. I belıeve CCE 2013 wıll be re-cunducted ıf the courts restore Agha Sahıb the Ex-Chaırman he wıll surely take the step.
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Raja Bahar For This Useful Post: | ||
Greenboat (Wednesday, January 04, 2017), NASSEEM (Sunday, January 01, 2017), saimabaloch (Monday, January 02, 2017) |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Every thing is possible with Hard work-but Luck is still factor over there |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Your concern has do weight but if the exam is not fairly conducted and paper is not done fairly so as interviews than there is absolute chance that honourable courts may declare it null and void.
See the functiong team including members and chairman was not selected on merit basis then how can they fair exams? Secondly do you think that team is corrupt but their selections are fair? I think this trend of fraud and lawlessness needs to blocked once and for all.
__________________
Those who wait they get. (Own Creation) |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Raja Bahar For This Useful Post: | ||
fasadi bacha (Monday, January 09, 2017), tanker (Tuesday, January 10, 2017) |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Finally SC ordered for re-interview
In today's hearing of suo moto case SC ordered Sindh Govt. to re-conduct interviews of all CCE-2015 (664) candidates...
__________________
wHen iT coMes tO moNey everYbody iS oF tHe sAme reliGion |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
It would be injustice with those who were allocated on merit, if they might not perform well in interview it means they would lose the job. In my view all need to be allocated or all need to take exam from the scratch. Justice should be equal.
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
absolutely no, they stated why interviews were conducted if the case was in Sindh high court bench , they further stated that, govt must provide answer in written regarding the responsible authority for appointment of ex-chairman, where as honorable judge further said that, i remain unsatisfied they will give order of rechecking of answer copies of all candidates
__________________
....... |
The Following User Says Thank You to fasadi bacha For This Useful Post: | ||
Greenboat (Thursday, January 19, 2017) |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
I think still this case is being resolved thoroughly and hurriedly as CCE, 2013 written part is being ignored. The actual blunder is done there as many competitive candidates were intentionally failed in the process particularly in one subject (Sindhi, History etc).
I wish the part be ordered to be reconducted. That will be the real justice in its true spirit.
__________________
Those who wait they get. (Own Creation) Last edited by incounternable; Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 10:33 AM. Reason: chain posts merged |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Raja Bahar For This Useful Post: | ||
fasadi bacha (Friday, January 20, 2017), Greenboat (Saturday, January 21, 2017) |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Asma Jilani ---- Vs---- Govt. of the Punjab | sajidnuml | Constitutional Law | 5 | Saturday, November 11, 2017 06:00 PM |
Mercantile Law Prepartion | letsfly | Mercantile Law | 2 | Sunday, May 11, 2014 01:13 PM |
The constitution of the islamic republic of pakistan, 1973[1] | IMTIAZ AHMAD KHAN | Constitutional Law | 0 | Thursday, February 14, 2013 05:40 PM |
Timeline: Judiciary vs executive | Call for Change | Current Affairs | 0 | Tuesday, June 19, 2012 06:14 PM |