Wednesday, May 08, 2024
07:51 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > Sindh Public Service Commission > SPSC Other Examinations

SPSC Other Examinations Sindh Public Service Commission

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Tuesday, May 10, 2011
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sindh
Posts: 230
Thanks: 55
Thanked 109 Times in 74 Posts
Babakhan is on a distinguished road
Default Bitter realities of CCE 2008

One of the current members of SPSC on the instructions of CM has started helping court petitioners and providing all they want to consolidate their case. They have been successfully provided a list of interview marks that is not signed by late Chairman SPSC clearly indicating that the forgery was practiced in the interview part of CCE 2008. It was also maintained that couple of members of SPSC were not ready to sign this manipulated result after the death of Mr. Abbasi. But lately on the pressure of few other members who had taken handsome money from the parties managed to get annoyed members back on track and probably given them their due share. This member is helping to consolidate the claims of petitioners. I HAVE ALREADY TOLD THE FORUM ABOUT THIS CHEAP ATTITUDE

One of those court petitioners who have strong political links is clearly saying that politicians were kept away SPSC from this game by few members. All politicians including CM are extremely annoyed at this act of forgery probably because of not giving them their due share. He clearly proclaimed that once court intervenes and stops the process of allocation he will even go harder on selected people specially those who used illegal means.

One more interesting piece of information that One of the Section Officers have been given 248.50 out of 250 in the interview to allow him to just reach the allocation list BY 0.50 marks as his written marks were very low. His mark sheet is also obtained by the petitioners. There are many other candidates who are involved in this practice of getting their interview marks increased after the death of SN Abbasi. But in this era of vibrancy thinking to hide any thing from people is just like living in fool’s heaven specially in Sindh where people don’t even hesitate to file a petition on a DCOs/Secretaries because they are not Grade-20 or don't have the training in Lahore.

All of above is conveyed to me through one of the petitioners against the anomalies in CCE 2008.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Babakhan For This Useful Post:
zaheer.sahito (Thursday, December 06, 2012)
  #2  
Old Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Agha Majid's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Karachi
Posts: 22
Thanks: 8
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
Agha Majid is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Babakhan View Post
One of the current members of SPSC on the instructions of CM has started helping court petitioners and providing all they want to consolidate their case. They have been successfully provided a list of interview marks that is not signed by late Chairman SPSC clearly indicating that the forgery was practiced in the interview part of CCE 2008. It was also maintained that couple of members of SPSC were not ready to sign this manipulated result after the death of Mr. Abbasi. But lately on the pressure of few other members who had taken handsome money from the parties managed to get annoyed members back on track and probably given them their due share. This member is helping to consolidate the claims of petitioners. I HAVE ALREADY TOLD THE FORUM ABOUT THIS CHEAP ATTITUDE

One of those court petitioners who have strong political links is clearly saying that politicians were kept away SPSC from this game by few members. All politicians including CM are extremely annoyed at this act of forgery probably because of not giving them their due share. He clearly proclaimed that once court intervenes and stops the process of allocation he will even go harder on selected people specially those who used illegal means.

One more interesting piece of information that One of the Section Officers have been given 248.50 out of 250 in the interview to allow him to just reach the allocation list BY 0.50 marks as his written marks were very low. His mark sheet is also obtained by the petitioners. There are many other candidates who are involved in this practice of getting their interview marks increased after the death of SN Abbasi. But in this era of vibrancy thinking to hide any thing from people is just like living in fool’s heaven specially in Sindh where people don’t even hesitate to file a petition on a DCOs/Secretaries because they are not Grade-20 or don't have the training in Lahore.

All of above is conveyed to me through one of the petitioners against the anomalies in CCE 2008.
Can you plz share the Interview Marks , the list you have mentioned in subject note.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sindh
Posts: 230
Thanks: 55
Thanked 109 Times in 74 Posts
Babakhan is on a distinguished road
Default

@Agha

I don’t have this list and I only convey the information which I obtain from one of the active persons in that group who lodged petition in High Court against CCE 2008. This person who is 9 to 5 with these petitioners has seen this list and told me the marks of this GENIUS Section Officer who obtained 248.50/250 in interview. n future if I receive any credible information I will post it on the forum.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Babakhan For This Useful Post:
Agha Majid (Monday, May 16, 2011)
  #4  
Old Monday, May 16, 2011
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sindh
Posts: 230
Thanks: 55
Thanked 109 Times in 74 Posts
Babakhan is on a distinguished road
Default

The case against 2008 is not heard yet by Sindh High Court and placed in queue of fresh cases; date of its hearing will soon be fixed. The group met their lawyer yesterday and discussed many things. Few of them are

1. Due to the under considered case against CCE 2008 offer letters issuing process will not be paused and people will get their offer letters unless court doesn’t think that process should be stopped.

2. Their lawyer has intimated the group that out of many points which are going to be presented in the court the delay of issuing mark sheet by SPSC after announcement is very strong and shows their mala fide intentions. The point against SPSC is their own announcement regarding the issuance of Mark sheets to failed candidates in major national newspaper and than due to unseen reasons failed to issue the mark sheets to failure candidates. Same news item can also be found on this forum in below mentioned link posted by Mr. Terminator.

http://www.cssforum.com.pk/sindh-pub...sc-news-2.html

The lawyer has discussed this point with few other judges of High court and they said after announcement if SPSC has failed to issue the mark sheets to failure candidates for re-counting claim purposes than there must be something wrong in those mark sheets and establishes a very strong ground for High or Supreme court to declare the interview part null and void in future. It has already been determined that candidates have been awarded exceptionally high marks i.e. 248.50/250 and attempt of SPSC hiding these kind of mark sheets by not issuing the same to all failed candidates presents a strong case against bad intentions of SPSC. According to the petitioners sources the staff at SPSC is ready to issue these mark sheets to failed candidates and they can do it comfortably but they are ordered by the members not to make these mark sheets public specially to those candidates who passed the written part and than attempted interview.

When this written result announced I thought something good is done to the youth but after the interview part the corruption of SPSC is revealing gradually. Allah knows what is next waiting in the line of SPSC’s corrupt practices. Both lawyer and petitioners are very much confident that in future they will win the case.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Babakhan For This Useful Post:
Agha Majid (Monday, May 16, 2011)
  #5  
Old Monday, May 16, 2011
ali36's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 107
Thanks: 37
Thanked 107 Times in 64 Posts
ali36 is on a distinguished road
Default at babakhan

Dear,I have read ur couple of threads.I dont know why u r so much frustrated with spsc.Majority of officers from sindh government r spsc qualified and they r competent,as many of them have qualified css also.I cannot understand why u have launched massive propaganda against spsc.U r maligning and defaming sindh n sindhi youth.I have all the respect for u right of freedom of expression as well as ur views.Amazingly u urself claim to have been selected by spsc as section officer.It means merit was given due consideration.Proof of it is ur own selection.What else I can Say?
__________________
Thou lovest: but ne'er knew love's sad satiety.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Tuesday, May 17, 2011
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sindh
Posts: 230
Thanks: 55
Thanked 109 Times in 74 Posts
Babakhan is on a distinguished road
Default

@Ali

By definition propaganda denotes to the dissemination of false information. If you doubt the credibility of information I provide to the forum just pick up a copy of court petition lodged against CCE 2008, available free of cost from Sindh High Court. See through the allegations in this petition and than you will be able to distinguish between reality and propaganda.

An examination like CCE can’t be manipulated fully as there are many meritorious people placed in the final list BUT along with them many JALEE candidates found their way into the merit list who managed to get their marks raised through using other sources. Similar to the CCE 2003 due to the acts of these JALEE people meritorious class also suffers. How come on earth a person gets 248.50 out of 250 in the interview of a competitive examination. This is just one little example known to us as I am 100% sure that when court probes into the issue and will involve anti corruption department in this process, many other JALEE candidates will be exposed. I am of this view that corruption in competitive examinations can’t be done for merely one or two people if it is done than many un deserving people had enjoyed the benefits. Likewise, when CCE 2003 case was brought to the court people had no idea that it would have turned out to be a list of candidates un deserving candidates exposed.

We people in Sindh should get rid of this typical mentality of not saying any thing against acts of politicians and working mechanism of corrupt institutions. If somebody courageously says anything against them he/she is labeled as somebody against them. Have we ever seen these kinds of things happening in Punjab Public Service Commission? I am not giving my judgment about any thing rather discussing the evidences gathered by petitioners here in this forum. Remaining investigation will be done by the courts in future.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Babakhan For This Useful Post:
god of war (Wednesday, May 18, 2011), Hamza Salick (Wednesday, May 18, 2011)
  #7  
Old Tuesday, May 17, 2011
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 89
Thanks: 5
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
fight for all is on a distinguished road
Default

Thank you for exposing corruption.lets see how many meritorious candidates r there in list.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Wednesday, May 18, 2011
Hamza Salick's Avatar
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2010 - Merit 25Member of the Year: Awarded to those community members who have made invaluable contributions to the Community in the particular year - Issue reason: Elite CSP Medal: Members who previously received (CSP Award  and Member of the Year Award ) OR (CSP award + Gold Medal + Medal of Appreciation) are eligible for this award. - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lahore,Multan,Durham(UK),Gilgit-Baltistan
Posts: 912
Thanks: 753
Thanked 1,898 Times in 694 Posts
Hamza Salick is a name known to allHamza Salick is a name known to allHamza Salick is a name known to allHamza Salick is a name known to allHamza Salick is a name known to allHamza Salick is a name known to all
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Babakhan View Post
@Ali

By definition propaganda denotes to the dissemination of false information. If you doubt the credibility of information I provide to the forum just pick up a copy of court petition lodged against CCE 2008, available free of cost from Sindh High Court. See through the allegations in this petition and than you will be able to distinguish between reality and propaganda.

An examination like CCE can’t be manipulated fully as there are many meritorious people placed in the final list BUT along with them many JALEE candidates found their way into the merit list who managed to get their marks raised through using other sources. Similar to the CCE 2003 due to the acts of these JALEE people meritorious class also suffers. How come on earth a person gets 248.50 out of 250 in the interview of a competitive examination. This is just one little example known to us as I am 100% sure that when court probes into the issue and will involve anti corruption department in this process, many other JALEE candidates will be exposed. I am of this view that corruption in competitive examinations can’t be done for merely one or two people if it is done than many un deserving people had enjoyed the benefits. Likewise, when CCE 2003 case was brought to the court people had no idea that it would have turned out to be a list of candidates un deserving candidates exposed.

We people in Sindh should get rid of this typical mentality of not saying any thing against acts of politicians and working mechanism of corrupt institutions. If somebody courageously says anything against them he/she is labeled as somebody against them. Have we ever seen these kinds of things happening in Punjab Public Service Commission? I am not giving my judgment about any thing rather discussing the evidences gathered by petitioners here in this forum. Remaining investigation will be done by the courts in future.
Although I hail from Punjab,still I commend the efforts u are king and am in support of total transparency for every institution..You are right when u speak about the trend that people in Pakistan don't budge and do anyhing themselves.And when somebody takes the stand,musters the courage to speak against corruption and wrongdoings,they try to pull his leg.It is a very good job that u people are doing.Carry on.N I hope no brother hear considers what I am saying an incursion of a Punjabi,because at the end of the day we are all Pakistanis.If we have to progress we have to stop being so protective about our provincial identities
__________________
I shall either find a way,or make one
'Wa tu izzu man-ta shaa, wa tu zillu man-ta shaa'
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Saturday, May 21, 2011
TheUniter's Avatar
Senior Member
Qualifier: Awarded to those Members who cleared css written examination - Issue reason: CE 2012- Roll No 5644
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Karachi.
Posts: 264
Thanks: 213
Thanked 124 Times in 93 Posts
TheUniter will become famous soon enough
Default

Dear Babakhan-First of all I pray for you people who have undergone injustice at the hands of the corrupt PPP govt. May Allah(SWT) give you success.
Quote:
One more interesting piece of information that One of the Section Officers have been given 248.50 out of 250 in the interview to allow him to just reach the allocation list BY 0.50 marks as his written marks were very low. His mark sheet is also obtained by the petitioners.
Babakhan-Can you share name of this candidate who has obtained 248.5 marks out of 250?
__________________
We can trust the man of troubles but not on the man of pleasures.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old Saturday, May 21, 2011
Banned
Qualifier: Awarded to those Members who cleared css written examination - Issue reason: CE 2010
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Melancholy
Posts: 59
Thanks: 2
Thanked 94 Times in 71 Posts
Saria Khan is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ali36 View Post
Dear,I have read ur couple of threads.I dont know why u r so much frustrated with spsc.Majority of officers from sindh government r spsc qualified and they r competent,as many of them have qualified css also.I cannot understand why u have launched massive propaganda against spsc.U r maligning and defaming sindh n sindhi youth.I have all the respect for u right of freedom of expression as well as ur views.Amazingly u urself claim to have been selected by spsc as section officer.It means merit was given due consideration.Proof of it is ur own selection.What else I can Say?

This corruption is all over there

here in ppsc things r not more but, may b less but same

i met those people who were offered from ppsc, called by official telephone,
one has to clear written by its own, and they will manage ur allocation by taking money

if total seats are 15, must sure, at least 3 are going to b allocate like this

i also have one more quite deeply example of SON of secretary ppsc


but

so no wounder what baba said, pray that deserving get their share
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Heads of State, President, Prime Minister and Cabinet Members Sureshlasi International Relations 29 Saturday, July 28, 2012 11:38 AM
FPSC Recruitment Tests safdarmehmood General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 2 Sunday, January 25, 2009 05:38 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.