ye raat laga tha ,they have accepted their few human mistakes

it is not the matter of tough and easy but the matter of wrong and right key and questions as due to these we are suffering out of 100, if ten questions have wrong option then what type of competition is this. my question is to those who have taken 50 or plus that what if ratio is set to 40. do they fear about competiting with them

the ball is in the court of spsc let it decide who is pass and fail we have just cheked our omr sheet the final result abhe baki he

I could not find any change in the key A...
Moreover i cannot understand the logic of not giving question papers in any competitive exam!!
How this act makes the process transparent while the asked question paper in the hand of candidates may lessen the queries...

__________________
i believe in Allah and he is the mere one who can help me...

Because, in every key more there are many mistakes. Plus, in paper we have come to know there are 17 wrong/invalid questions. Paper setter took many questions from not reliable sources, because he set same wrong answers in the options.

I think now SPSC would be more controversial, because if now SPSC is going to make amendments in keys , then certainly various candidates would be failed from the candidates who are passed now and another thing some candidates would also be passed from failures. so this is a controversial and sensitive issue thus to avoid this controversy it is better for SPSC to give 10 to 12 marks to each candidate. then this problem will be resolved other wise no any other solution would be acceptable to all candidates.

__________________
Some thing is better than Nothing

It is agreeable, I have a reasonable solution for this problem, those who have been passsed with wrong keys and wrong/invalid questions/answers, they must be remained qualified and those who are below passing marks they should be given 10 to 15 grace marks minimum. It would be acceptable to all and in this way spsc will learn a lesson and it will be very aware to set such invalid papers in the future. In this solution, neither spsc nor candidates will be affected and this will be win win solution to all.. I dare to say that by giving 10 to 15 grace marks, competent candidates won't be affected at all.

Moreover, last time spsc conducted same written excem except screening with a large number of candidates, however, this time, with grace 10 to 15 marks or with 40+ passing marks will be okay to all and it will fill the gape of the canddiates to appear in the written.

However, if they don't solve the problem with the above given suggestion which is reasonable, then the effects would be very worst, grave and destructive for both SPSC and Candidates. SPSC will loose

SPSC had a whole year to set the screening test and they came up with this, a test containing illogical questions where candidates had to rely on guess work and luck. I believe that grace marks should be awarded for the incorrect questions and key should be corrected. Cancelling the test would further delay the process as we have waited for CCE for far too long. Only in this way can SPSC right the wrong that has been done.

dear I think SPSC wants to go away from their duty thus they are making a mockery of prestigious exam of CCE because at least they should have to conduct CCE written exam from 10000 candidates, but they are trying to conduct only from 1000 candidates.

__________________
Some thing is better than Nothing

40% MARKS or no future for CCE-2013 exam.

__________________
Jab tumhain Urooj mil jae tou teen cheezien kabhi na bholo,
Khuda, Uski Makhlooq, aur..................... apni Oukaat.