@fight
U r talking about JUST FOUR CHAPS?? You should carefully analyze the written result I'm sure you'll gonna die LOL

this is a serious issue. all what has been stated by u, must have been correct. Questions arise, if they had got their domicile before 2005, it must have been written there RURAL now did they get their domiciled changed ? or did they URBAQN DOMICILE in SPSC at the time of submission of form ? if yes so why SPSC mentioned them as Rural on Official Website ? and it they submitted their new URBAN domicile after interview or after passing the written part of exam so it is surely very very serious issue. more serious it becomes if the domicile has been acquire after the declarartion of the SPSC written part of the result ? very serious issue.

Assalamoalaikum:

Dear Nasar,

you had preapred the "Name List" of the recommended candidates with the help of the announced result and " List of the candidates " available on the website of the SPSC. why could you dont detect this blunder of changed domicile?

if " Taluka Change" is a reason for SUkkur candidates , what would one say abt Hyderabad candidate mentioned at serial number 4 of changed domicile case. Roll no.10357 (Hyd-U) selected as section officer.

SPSC must be ashamed of this incompetence.

This is for information of everyone that file has not reached CM as was claimed by various members here. In fact its with CS right now.

Dear Asim....

there have been some changes in the districs of Sindh. Like Sukkur, Hyderabad was also bifurcated. I think there may not be "curroption" as far as the domicile is concerned. However, the concerned candidates can best answer the question. Meanwhile, I will request the forum members to be mature enough and dont create hype of each and everything. SPSC is not a childish institute, it must have scrutinized these things according to its rules. I know Nasrullah Mako. He had also passed one written test conducted by FPSC. (I dont remember the name). However, if anyone has doubt, it is his /her right to contest this issue before SPSC authorities, meanwhile I would request the forum members to be careful in leveling allegations against a person or authority.

Thanks and take care.

I know mr nasrullah mako personally. He is a deserving and meritorious candidate. He has already been serving in ASF as inspector (he was selected by FPSC on sindh u domicile). Only spsc should be blamed for these types of, mentioned in above posts, errors. I think the result announced by spsc is fair and on merit. We could not be allocated because we were down in the merit list. Now it is of no use to cry over split milk.

__________________
Ability is nothing without opportunity.

Dear Nasar,

nobody is criticizing u and nobody favours that hype should be created. It was a simple question from one brother that is legitimate that when u prepared the list of recommended candidates , u must have seen the names in candidates' list available on website, so this difference of domicile should have been noted by u as u r intelligent enough.

SPSC , specially after the experience of Last CCE is extra cautuous and i m of the opinion that result is purely on merit, if a candidate submits his new domicile to SPSC , the SPSC is bound to deal that as per rules and nobody believes that SPSC might have done something wrong , specially in this type of active judiciary and experience of last CCE.

u r right the not SPSC but those candidate have to clarify their positions and the person, among those four , who has been recommended as DDO has high merit ( any one can check result), had he not had the domicile of URBAN, even then he would have been recommended on RURAL domicile.

pointing out individual and clerical mistakes is neither aimed at creating doubts over the result. Result is on merit and and we are very humbly thank ALLAH on this blessing.

u have topped and thats y everybody looks towards u for help and any explanation that one needs.

Take care.

Dear Candidatespsc......

Thanks for complement. I am an ordinary person and a good friend of all of you. When I had prepared the list I put the domicile as per final result of the interviews, because there were some errors in the seat numbers list: like some students were written shia, hindu and some mistakes of surname also, therefore, I considered the final result as far as domicile is concerned.

Dear would you share your result, if you like to?

Thanks and take good care of yourself.

Dear Ali, How much authentic the news is.

Very much authentic