Monoply of Jinnah

[irum]

Assalaoalikum!
welcome Mr.Fawwad
The first episold of ur drama is really somewhat dramatic. all are waiting what will happened next.
so i think u r besy in making this next episold

Wish u best of luck 4 ur edis...

Qamer Cheema elaborate his views by this qutation;
“Few individuals significantly alter the course of history. Fewer still modify the map of the world. Hardly anyone can be credited with creating a nation state. Muhammad Ali Jinnah did all three. ……Quid-I-Azam was one of recent history’s most charismatic leaders….”


So after reading Qamers's previous post evry doubt is wipe away.
I think u must reviw ur rmarks


Regards

[amjad hafeez]

There are two parameters with which the level of a society is measured:how they bury their dead and how they remember their heroes.Unfortunately we don,t qualify well for both of these.Lord Lothian once said that the idea of Pakistan presented by Jinnah is great but it will not be a reality within the next 25 years.But great wars and great personalities reduce the span of history.That was what the Quaid really did.I believe that there should be no heroworship yet there must be no defaming or character assassination of these dignitaries of the freedom drive.We must salute to the martyrs who laid their lives.Yes, there must be objective analysis and criticism.

[thinking]

Dear ijaz,

who told u that the criteria of burying the leaders and remembering the heroes to be used for measuring the level of a society???????????

[atifch]

yeh allah ka fazal tha is qom pay kay kay quaid jald hi allah ko piyaray ho gaye ..warna hum nay zuroor un ko hang ker dia hota ...aur aaj pachta rahay hotay ...
allah mian aap ka shukria k aap nay quaid ko izat say utha lia.

[asim sial]

please don't give some remarks abt our great leader.he gave us atleast freedom.u r asking abt the person who inspired not only muslims as well as hindu leaders and all the great leaders of the world,he spoiled his personal life for his nation.i m giving u a refrence from history.


Mohammad Ali Jinnah: Mohammad Ali Jinnah (1875-1948) was initially a Congress member and endeavored to bring about the political union of Muslims and Hindus.when he saw that congress is only representiative of hindus, He left Congress in 1920. but the turning point came when Congress leaders ignored Muslim demands for one third of the seats in any future parliaments. Jinnah never trusted Congress after several exclusions of Muslim interest in Congress decisions. He worked furiously to amass Muslim support for teh League to show the world that the League and the League only was the true representation of India's Muslims.

[trotsky59]

some questions about Jinnah that creat confusion for me i hope some body will answer them
1)why Jinnah was the doutiest opponent of ALL Idian MUslim League when it came into bieng in 1906?

2)why Jinnah bitterly opposed the demand of seperate electorate in 1909?

3)why Jinnah and Iqbal were againt the so-called khilafat movement and praised the policies of Ataturk who dissolved the khilafat in Turkey?

4)why Jinnah left indian politics in 1930 just after giving his 14 points in 1929?

5)why did he came back ?

6)where did the two nation theory go when jinnah accepted the cabinate mission plan in 1946 according to which no pakistan was to be made?

7)why jinnah concetrated all the powers into his hands and made dictatorial decisions whereas in parliamentary system govenor general is a nominial head as was in India?

8)why jinnah wanted to over impose urdu language on bengalis which was the first cleavage which further torn pakistan asunder?

9)why jinnah dissolved the democratically elected government of NWFP and paved way for undemocratic traditions in pakistan?

10)why Jinnah sent army to balochistan to teach lesson to inocient balochis and set a tradition of supressing innocient balochis through army?

[mudassir_701]

i would like to comment on this topic in one line...jinnah was a lawyer hired by the muslims to plead their case in the british courts for their freedom...and nothing else...........i m not denying the fact that he was n he is a great leader but wats in the history i would like to say that history is full of doubts....

[shayan]

cooooooolllllllllllllllll

[Aarwaa]

if its so easy to carve a homeland.. y we have failed to liberate kashmir from the clutches of indians..... dont say that the indians have military strength..lets forget about the role that leaders play in the lives of ppl and start hiring LAWYERS.. (it seems that there does not exist any lawyer of his calibre )..we must not forget he was a leader who gave us Pakistan ...he was a Great Leader not a mere LAWYER hired by Muslims.....ppl are crticizing Quaied e azam from the comfort of their homes in a free country where muslims are in majority..do u think u ppl would have done so in united india..none of us would have that leisure....we owe our freedom to quaid-e-azam ..no doubt about that..

[PEERLESS]

I am deeply hurt by comments of some fellows.It is very easy to comment on or to critisize someone, but very difficult to face realities and facts.Just think for a while why did the leaders of All India Muslim forced Jinnah to come back and lead the freedom movement? This is reality that there was not a single leader who could face the genious of Gandhi and Nehru calibre but Quaid.I am scared by the questions raised by trotsky. He was a great leader and was recpected by his rivals.So please dont comment on such sensitive subjects.
I was very much hurt when i first time came to know that Gandhi family has nothing in common with Gandhi but they feel proud to add gandhi with their name.And miss Deena Wadia did never like to add Jinnah with her name but her husband's name.
If you have ever come accross any member of the Jinnah family other than Wadia family you will surely agree with Atifch and will be forced to think what have we done with our leaders.