Tuesday, May 21, 2024
08:07 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > Banking & Finance > Banking Jobs > State Bank of Pakistan

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #81  
Old Friday, December 26, 2014
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Lahore
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Realistic Star is on a distinguished road
Default

I've got 62 marks in aggregate. english 23, quantitative 24 and gk 15. but i am qualified.
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old Friday, December 26, 2014
pureapak's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Karachi
Posts: 854
Thanks: 333
Thanked 487 Times in 320 Posts
pureapak is a jewel in the roughpureapak is a jewel in the roughpureapak is a jewel in the rough
Default

your aggregate marks should have been equal or more than 65.
Qualifying criteria on NTS Webpage is being displayed as 65 marks in aggregate and 50% in each section.
__________________
"Despite the cost of living, have you noticed how popular it remains?"
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old Friday, December 26, 2014
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 57
Thanks: 12
Thanked 23 Times in 15 Posts
THISWORLDSUCKSMAN is on a distinguished road
Default

Sec 1-28
Sec 2-24
Sec 3-15
total -67 (Qualified)
Those who have been declared qualified with 62 or 61 are qualified...They need not worry about it...This seems to be a lowering of cutt-off grade to 60 with atleast 50 % marks in each section but which has not yet been updated in the pop up window....so congrats to all such candidates...they are lucky...
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to THISWORLDSUCKSMAN For This Useful Post:
nimra younas (Sunday, December 28, 2014)
  #84  
Old Friday, December 26, 2014
pureapak's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Karachi
Posts: 854
Thanks: 333
Thanked 487 Times in 320 Posts
pureapak is a jewel in the roughpureapak is a jewel in the roughpureapak is a jewel in the rough
Default

# thisworldsuxman

how can you say that with this much surety ? coz the qualifying criteria on the official web page is conflicting.
Have you talked to the concerned NTS official on this query ??
__________________
"Despite the cost of living, have you noticed how popular it remains?"
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old Friday, December 26, 2014
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 57
Thanks: 12
Thanked 23 Times in 15 Posts
THISWORLDSUCKSMAN is on a distinguished road
Default

Faz khan great try but a little unfortunate though, but this is not the end of the world....if you can do 67 in nts, it would be real easy for you to get through next time with a more improvised strategy...i didn't study a single thing for nts because it is useless to study for nts...its only strategy and improvisation...try to give due time to each section...i realised it after i nearly got plucked in og2...best of luck and don't be dejected...
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old Friday, December 26, 2014
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 57
Thanks: 12
Thanked 23 Times in 15 Posts
THISWORLDSUCKSMAN is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pureapak View Post
# thisworldsuxman

how can you say that with this much surety ? Coz the qualifying criteria on the official web page is conflicting.
Have you talked to the concerned nts official on this query ??
actually this is an educated guess and presumption but i am dead sure that it is so. It would, otherwise, be lethal for nts to make such mistakes and in reality you don't find nts making such blunders so often and which infact, could lead to orchestration of legal proceedings against nts. My point is it is not a mistake, only a lowering of cut-off grade that hasn't yet been announced officially....they had made it clear earlier that the cut-off grade would be based on the optimisation of vacancies and the number of candidates which in this case has gone in favour of candidates....
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old Friday, December 26, 2014
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 17
Thanks: 15
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
mshabbir65 is on a distinguished road
Default My Result

English 21/40
Quant: 30/30
GK=Economics 17/30
Total: 68
Qualified Alhamdulilah
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old Friday, December 26, 2014
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 104
Thanks: 50
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
tracyjones is on a distinguished road
Default

qualified Alhamdulilah 67
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old Friday, December 26, 2014
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 76
Thanks: 14
Thanked 28 Times in 23 Posts
eeriesilence is on a distinguished road
Default info required regarding interview

Alhumdulillah. I am also among those few lucky ones who passed. 77 marks, 29 in english, 28 in mathematics and 20 in GK.
As I have read at the posts in the threads, many people stressed that candidates with 70 percent above marks are selected. I would like to know if it is true.
Also, can someone please elaborate the expected topics or questions for the interview? if there is an SBP employee here, your guidance is requested.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old Friday, December 26, 2014
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: islamabad
Posts: 4
Thanks: 8
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
nimra younas is on a distinguished road
Default

aggregate 60 but Qualified Alhamdulillah!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
batch-3, officer og-1, sbp


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pakistan's History From 1947-till present Sumairs Pakistan Affairs 13 Sunday, October 27, 2019 02:55 PM
A Dry Pakistan!!! Jamshed Iqbal General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 0 Wednesday, November 23, 2011 01:23 AM
History of Pak-US Relations Shooting Star Current Affairs 0 Tuesday, July 19, 2011 12:50 AM
Pak-india relations Mao Zedong Current Affairs 0 Thursday, October 21, 2010 02:56 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.