It was not from want of perceiving the beauty of external nature but from the different way of perceiving it, that the early Greeks did not turn their genius to portray, either in colour or in poetry, the outlines, the hues, and contrasts of all fair valley, and hold cliffs, and golden moons, and rosy lawns which their beautiful country affords in lavish abundance.
Primitive people never so far as I know, enjoy when is called the picturesque in nature, wild forests, beetling cliffs, reaches of Alpine snow are with them great hindrances to human intercourse, and difficulties in the way of agriculture. They are furthermore the homes of the enemies of mankind, of the eagle, the wolf, or the tiger, and are most dangerous in times of earthquake or tempest. Hence the grand and striking features of nature are at first looked upon with fear and dislike.
I do not suppose that Greeks different in the respect from other people, except that the frequent occurrence of mountains and forests made agriculture peculiarly difficult and intercourse scanty, thus increasing their dislike for the apparently reckless waste in nature. We have even in Homer a similar feeling as regards the sea, --- the sea that proved the source of all their wealth and the condition of most of their greatness. Before they had learned all this, they called it “the unvintagable sea” and looked upon its shore as merely so much waste land. We can, therefore, easily understand, how in the first beginning of Greek art, the representation of wild landscape would find no place, whereas, fruitful fields did not suggest themselves as more than the ordinary background. Art in those days was struggling with material nature to which it felt a certain antagonism.

There was nothing in the social circumstances of the Greeks to produce any revolution in this attitude during their greatest days. The Greek republics were small towns where the pressure of the city life was not felt. But as soon as the days of the Greeks republics were over, the men began to congregate for imperial purposes into Antioch, or Alexandria, or lastly into Rome, than we seek the effect of noise and dust and smoke and turmoil breaking out into the natural longing for rural rest and retirement so that from Alexander’s day …… We find all kinds of authors --- epic poets, lyricist, novelists and preachers --- agreeing in the precise of nature, its rich colours, and its varied sounds. Mohaffy: Rambles in Greece

Title: Evolution of Greek Art

Early Greeks perceived nature differently. Therefore, they could not appreciate the nature in their art. Early people also failed to admire the beauty of natural phenomena. It was because they considered nature to be an obstacle to their interaction, unfavorable for agriculture and home to their enemies such as wild animals. Resultantly, at first, nature was feared and abhorred. Similarly, the early Greeks also disliked nature because they considered it as a hindrance to their daily life. They even considered sea to be a wasteful resource. Thus the neglect of the representation of nature in the art of early Greeks is understandable. Also, the social-setup of that era did not warrant any change in their attitude towards nature. However, when they moved from small towns to the city-states they started to long for the peace of rural life. This change resulted in the emergence of the Greek art that was full of appreciation of nature.

Title: Perception is everything

Everything is depend upon perception. Greek perceived nature as danger and not depict it in pictures. Geographically limits didn't allow to mingle peoples.Agriculture were not spread because there is no contact between peoples. Peoples longing for pastoral life became the poet.

__________________
“Never leave that till tomorrow which you can do today.”
Benjamin Franklin