Dear Member, Please give candid review to my introduction of the current topic.

Politics and not economics is the key to the success

The present world scenario is all about proving yourself right and getting maximum number of votes on your side. To achieve this purpose, politics is assumed to be the best available option as one of the main purpose of politics is to outmaneuver your opponent. Therefore, if one discuss about the comparison between politics and economy as a key factor to the success, no doubt politics will get stronger logic to support it. Economy has its own part to play in the success of a nation. However, it also needs a strong political force to manage it. Only strong economy can lead a nation to the success and to make an economy strong, Strong political leadership and tactics are required. The success factor of China is considered to be its strong economy. However, it is the policy of non-intervention of successive Chinese government that provided its economy to flourish. Further, in 2001, it was a political decision that lead Pakistan and Trukey towards a different fate. Pakistan’s political decision was to aligh itself with American in war against terrorism and eventually it destroyed its economy and threatened the very existence of it. On the other hand, Turkey decided to remain aloof from this war and flourish in all these years by leaps and bonds. Therefore, it is rightly argued that it is politics and not economics that is key to success.

You personally think that economics is better than politics, and your introduction is telling this story. You are finding it difficult to defend political supremacy over economics.

Such an introduction may get you through if the examiner is in a good mood. This, it would become a matter of luck.

It would not force him to give you passing marks.



Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk

__________________
One must be a wise reader to quote wisely and well; said Bronson Alcott

Actually i am finding it difficult to address this topic properly. I think I should not waste my time on this topic and leave it. There are plenty of other topics to do.

faiza first make outlines , do brainstorming ,jot down your ideas. eventually you will figure out which aspect is more stonger-economics or politics. once you are clear , then you can write introduction more clear and easily. introduction should have some association and connection with the outlines.

Thank you for guidance.....!!!!!!!

Politics, not economy is the key to success
introduction

The political system decides the course of economic independence. Economics is neither a policy nor a system; it is a tool, which succeeds when successfully used by political powers .the world’s most reliable union of states, the European Union, is the natural result of the political stability of Europe. If the Europe had a failed political system like Middle East, it could never be united. Rich economies and higher GDP cannot solve the issue of national integration and inequality unless economy is regulated by a state to bring equality of opportunity and rights. The failure of politics makes impossible the success of any economic and social policy. The sufferings of underdeveloped states are not because their economic system fails; it is the outcome of the corrupt nature of their political systems. India, despite an expanding economy, fails in reducing poverty because it lacks the political will and a transparent system for the equal distribution of resources. The rise and falls of the nations are decided by their politics; the developed and powerful nations have strong and stable political system on which they erect the edifice of their social and economic progress. Political power defines success as well as the failure.

A. Politics was the decisive factor in the success of developed states.

1. The political steps of the Britain’s Whig party made the nation economically independent.
2. The pre- revolution slogan of USA was not economic independence but ‘first representation then taxation’; they demanded a representative political system which made them world’s biggest power.
3. Farsighted political diplomacy of the Western Europe led them towards the formation of the European Union.
4. The installation of a stable political system in Germany transformed it from a war-torn country to a leading economy of Europe.
5. China became potential world power only with its political determination.

B. T he failure of politics and not the economy leads to wars and terrorism.

1. Political instability in Middle East and resultant crisis
2. Economics failed to play a role in integrating South Asian nations.
3. The agonies of Afghanistan emanates from the political failure of state.

C. A stable political system is essential for holistic progress

1. Politics and not the economy define the rights regarding the distribution of resources and opportunities.
2. A functional political system regulates all the resources of state to bring progress.

3. Politics unites people of differing origins and races in the bond of nationalism; economy does not create nations.


D. Economics, without politics is a failure.

1. The failed economic policies of SAARC
2. Lack of political cohesion and failure of ECO
3. Political disintegration in ASEAN block results in economic fragmentation of society.

E .only a successful political apparatus ensures national and international peace and economic prosperity.

Conclusion

please evaluate my essay

Your previous introductions were stronger than this one.

what is lacking in it? and what about the outline

In my opinion, this essay would easily clear the threshold of 40 marks.

I like it how you have managed to bring in examples across the globe.


Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk

__________________
One must be a wise reader to quote wisely and well; said Bronson Alcott