Source for this 'academic' definition?

Wikipedia's definition is garbage. It cites no references. Some Tom, Dick or Harry probably came up with it in his basement.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

-Introduction

1. Indicators of a country's progress
-----Rule of Law: Mechanisms of Accountability and Transparent System.
-----Social Integration
-----Social Development
-----Effective Administrative Machinery

2. Characteristics of Colonial Mentality
-----Divide and Rule
-----Elitist Administrative Services
-----Focus on Revenue Collection and Law and Order only while neglecting social development
-----Disdain for freedom of Expression
-----Lack of Rule of Law

3. Manifestations of Colonial Mentality Impeding Progress of Pakistan
-----Elitist Administrative Model which is despotic and self aggrandizing
-----Docile and Pliable Bureaucracy at the hands of Politicians which focus on obliging politicans rather than citizens
-----Fragile Rule of Law which affects Pakistan's economy
-----Politics of Ethnicity which undermines Social Integration
-----Power Politics which makes the sole objectives of Political Parties to gain or retain power.
-----Disdain for Freedom of Expression which undermines transparency and promotes corruption

4. Way Forward
-----Strengthening Rule of Law by empowering anti-corruption units.
-----Empowering Bureaucracy by providing them constitutional security of Tenure.
-----Promoting Education.

5. Conclusion

__________________
Anything that happens once will never happen again, but anything that happens twice will surely happen again and again

Google "Is Colonial Mentality Hindering India's success?" and check all the essays and articles. Essay Examiner actually copied the idea from these sites just putting in Pakistan instead of India.

__________________
Anything that happens once will never happen again, but anything that happens twice will surely happen again and again

one more thing. Colonial mentality of Indo-Pakistan can be different to those of American or African Colonies. Colonial Mentality simply emerges out of the mentality i.e the ways, of the colonizing countries. Vietnam would have a legacy of different colonial mentality which would reflect the French ways of administration and ruling. Similarly, that of Philippine would resemble US. So, cannot be a single definition. Not possible. But one thing is essential in all: exploitation. But still, as its not a dictionary term, its quite subjective.

__________________
Anything that happens once will never happen again, but anything that happens twice will surely happen again and again

This topic can be interpreted differently. It's not a Physics numerical that one has to reach the exact answers. No two persons can have same arguments on a particular essay. This is what essay is all about. It all depends whether one was able to reference content in the exam or not.

Is this your outline in the essay this time?

Yes. Some points are missing. Just wrote what i can recall.

__________________
Anything that happens once will never happen again, but anything that happens twice will surely happen again and again

Then it's good one. Now did you reference what you wrote?

hmm, But ive done some browsing now and have to agree with partypooer. The topic is highly problematic.

__________________
Anything that happens once will never happen again, but anything that happens twice will surely happen again and again

Yes. Rationalized every aspect by creating a linkage from the British Colonial rule. For e.g, linked Politics of Ethnicity with British Politics of Divide and rule, power politics of political parties with British struggle of retaining control over important departments of the Indian machinery, docile and pliable bureaucracy with the British policy of keeping the admin machinery under their control through British Governor e.t.c

__________________
Anything that happens once will never happen again, but anything that happens twice will surely happen again and again