Originally Posted by sadafnoorelahi

no dear. its not for status of women ion pakistan. this is the outline of " does pakistani society regard woman as an angel in the house or source of all evils".

now please comment. if my outline satisfies the demand of the topic.

Originally Posted by nisma khan

true dialogue is wher both sides are willing.........

Originally Posted by sadafnoorelahi

please guess the topic of outline.

“wanton killing of innocent people is terrorism, not war against terrorism”

naom chomsky

“true dialogue is the one in which both sides are willing to change” nhat hanh

“peace cannot be made with war” shamshad ahmed

"terrorism like virus is everywhere" jean baudrillard
I) Introduction
II) Terrorism and means to curb it
A) Dialogue
i) U.S dialogue with Taliban
ii) Pakistan dialogue with india
iii) Success of Syrian dialogue
B) Sanctions
i) Economic sanctions imposed by U.S on iran
C) War/coercive measures
i) War on terror
ii) Palestine-israel hostility
iii) Use of force in kashmir
III) Dialogue vs coercive measures
A) Merits of dialogue
i) Dialogue is inexpensive
ii) Peaceful way
iii) Sustainable measure
B) Demerits of a dialogue
i) Time consuming
ii) Laborious process
IV) Conclusion
Terrorism is a global phenonmenon. Like a giant monster, it has entangled the entire world in its tentacles. It keeps on budding and spreading similar to a hydra. Terrorism is an ideology whereby individuals or organizations resort to the use of violence and force to achieve their Machiavellian goals. Particularly, ever since 9/11, the entire world has suffered immensely because of ever-increasing terrorism. nevertheless, modern day terrorism can be traced back to the soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979. Sensible quarters all over the world have deliberated, negotiated, pondered over multitutude options such as dialogue, diplomacy, coercive measures, sanctions to curb the menace. Force is the last option. The foremost priority is dialogue. though, it is a painstaking, laborious, time-consuming process, yet it is peaceful, inexpensive, sustainable option which is very likely to produce positive results.

Originally Posted by Tashfeen Alam

Subject: Essay
From: tashfeen_alam@yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 22:44:18 +0500
To: asad_joe@hotmail.com

Dialogue is the best way to combat terrorism.

Outline

1. Introduction.
1.1. The lesson that the history teaches us is that dialogue is the best way to combat terrorism.
1.2. Let us never negotiate out of fear, but let us never fear to negotiate
2. Body.
2.1. Terrorism is a menace for any state or country in both social and economic spheres.
2.2. The available options to combat terrorism.
2.2.1. A full fledge military option: can kill the terrorists but not their ideology.
2.2.2. Surrender: an option that no state can afford at any situation.
2.2.3. Dialogue: A drop of honey catches more flies than a hogshead of vinegar.
2.3. Reasons why dialogue is the best way to combat terrorism.
2.3.1. Dialogue is the permanent solution to combat terrorism.
2.3.2. Dialogue achieves result with no loss of human lives and infrastructure damage at all.
2.3.3. Dialogue is backed by the populace of the state.
2.3.4. Dialogue shows the seriousness of the state's authority to completely eradicate terrorism.
2.3.5. Dialogue leaves no room for the false propaganda of the terrorists.
2.4. The positive impacts of using dialogue to combat terrorism.
2.4.1. Dialogue results in the peace: the most essential element for any state's success.
2.4.2. The nation is put to the path towards prosperity.
2.4.3. Harmony prevails within the state: reuniting all of the population.
2.4.4. The socio-economic factors affected by terrorism resume their duty to contribute towards the progress of the state.

2.5. Comparison of the states that have used dialogue to combat the terrorism with the states that have used the milatary option for terrorism.
2.5.1. Ireland vs. Afghanistan.
2.5.2. Fall of East Pakistan vs. reunification of Germany.
2.6. Pragmatic suggestions that would strengthen the positive results of dialogue to combat terrorism.
2.6.1. Role of media.
2.6.2. Role of strong political will.
2.6.3. Role of social institutions.
2.6.4. Role of general public.
2.6.5. Role of the regional and international organisations.
2.6.6. Non interference of the vested interest groups.
3. Conclusion.
3.1. Critical analysis: terrorism can only be best defeated with the recipe of dialogue.
3.2. Wars kill the enemies but dialogue ends the terrorism for good.




Terrorism has always been haintung the world in one way or the other. One time it loomed larged in the conflict of the Protestants with the Catholics. In another chapter of the history, the Cold War era incited terrorist activities affecting the whole world. The list consists infinite instances of terrorism e.g. the North Ireland terrorism, the Islamic extremists etc. They all had different condemnable motives. Every time they were tried to be crushed by force, the reappeared stronger than before. Consequently, the need for bringing the terrorists to the negotiating table was felt necessary. To simply put, dialogue has always been used to curb terroism.

“Force is all conquering, but it's victories are short lived.”
-Abraham Lincoln.

Undoubtedly, dialogue is the best way to combat terroism. There is no divided opinion on the fact that terrosim is a menace for any country. It causes nothing but disasters, in both human and economic losses, for the respective country. In order to eradicate terrorism, three options are available. First is of a military action. History is the epitome that it always results in a negative way by showing the terroists as being the innocent and the oppressed. Second solution is of surrender that no country can affird to choose. The last option is of dialogue. This option not only ends the terrorism once and for all but also there is nohumand and economic loss. Along with this, it is heavily supported by the populace. It also shows the seriousness of the government. Consequently, hampering the false propaganda of the terrorists by which they recruit the innocent public. It causes both immediate and long lasting impacts for that state. The peace prevails and the envoronment of fear is removed. It restarts the economic machinery. Besides this, the whole public is being reunited. All in all, leading the state towards the path of prosperity. Hence, a once failing state starts to firm its feet for progress. with the help of pragmatic steps dialogue can cause a very positive role. With the joint efforsts of the governement, society, media etc., dialogue can eliminate terrorism. It can only succed with the sincere efforsts from all ends.

"Let us never negotiate out of fear, but let us never fear to negotiate."
-JOHN F. KENNEDY

Originally Posted by nisma khan

I. Introduction
II. Pakistani society regards woman as an evil
A) Evidence of disregard of woman in Pakistani society
1) Higher rate of illetracy amongst women
2) International indicators (women empowerment and gender development index)
3) Poor health conditions
4) Economic disparity between man and woman
a) In inheritance
b) Job selections
c) Salary packages and other incentives
5) Denial to important decision making
6) Passive participation in politics
7) Physical torture
a) Rape
b) Honour killing
c) Burning/immolation
d) Acid throwing
e) Domestic violence of other type
B) Causes of “evil” status of women in Pakistan
1) Historical evidence of bloody feud between cane and abel
2) Exploitation at the hands of feudal lords
3) High rate of illiteracy
4) Hardcore extremist religious views
5) Widespread poverty
6) Centuries old customs of dowry, honour killing, swara, vani etc
7) Political inactivity of women
III. Contrary views on status of women in Pakistani society
A) constitution
B) Increase in political participation of women in recent times
C) Economic independence of women in urban areas
D) Passage of harassment bill in 2012
E) Better academic scores of women
F) Increase in number of women colleges, women universities and girl student enrollment
G) Participation of women in all sectors of society
IV. Conclusion


to me these points r missing in the outlines
-why women r an angels or blessing
-why womens r considered as a curse
-religion s impact on gender
-comparision between women of different cultures

Originally Posted by Muhammad Irfan Mandokhail

tashfeen can we connect on email so that i can share my outlines with you as its my last chance and i don't want to miss any opportunity

Originally Posted by Tashfeen Alam

following is my essay of 2013. I am sharing the outline (as best as I can remember)

Topic: Free speech should have limitations


1. Introduction

1.1. Your freedom ends where my nose begins.
1.2. Yes, free speech should have limitations.

2. Body.

2.1. Free speech and its types.
2.1.1. Verbal free speech.
2.1.2. Written free speech.

2.2. Free speech turning into hate speech.

2.3. Free speech can be used adversely in many aspects.
2.3.1. Misuse of free speech on religious beliefs.
2.3.2. Misuse of free speech on gender.
2.3.3. Misuse of free speech on race.
2.3.4. Misuse of free speech on caste.
2.3.5. Misuse of free speech on sects.

2.4. Adverse impacts when free speech is misused.
2.4.1. It creates vandalism.
2.4.2. It causes economic and human loss.
2.4.3. It causes segregation among people.
2.4.4. It causes social unrest.
2.4.5. It creates non tolerance in society.

2.5. Comparison of events where free speech has been used and its impacts.
2.5.1. Innocence of Muslims movie and reaction of muslims.
2.5.2. Racial segregation in USA caused division among Americans.

2.6. Pragmatic steps to restrict free speech turning into hate speech.
2.6.1. Legislations by United Nations.
2.6.2. Role of governments.
2.6.3. Role of media.
2.6.4. Public awareness.
2.6.5. Role of society.


3. Conclusion.
3.1. Critical analysis: free speech should be limited to the extent where it harms people.
3.2. Free speech is only useful when it does not cross it's boundaries.