#51
|
||||
|
||||
Those who think re-exam is agaist rules, please open your eyes. These rules are for candidates i.e. candidates can not demand a re-exam like in case a candidate fell ill & is unable to appear or incase some mishap happens with a candidate during exam & he is unable to complete his paper etc. So according to this rule, such a candidate can't demand a re-exam on medical or any other grounds whatsoever.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Sarrial Banda For This Useful Post: | ||
venomous sophie (Monday, December 02, 2013) |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Sir i like your approach in this regard. Sir i want to drag your attention towards the FPSC intention cum revenge. Sir a very phrase " A revengeful mind does not do justice". Is this the pattern of working of FPSC than sorry to say that FPSC has lost its credibility and trust and under this scenario FPSC has to be shutdown by morally.
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Syed Umair For This Useful Post: | ||
Tauseef Dar (Sunday, November 24, 2013), venomous sophie (Monday, December 02, 2013) |
#53
|
||||
|
||||
Try kar lo but I doubt koi khaatir khua result aaye ga.
__________________
In order to succeed, your desire for success should be greater than your fear of failure.... |
The Following User Says Thank You to aminshah101 For This Useful Post: | ||
venomous sophie (Monday, December 02, 2013) |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Dear your comments match your username. They are very "sarrial". Which dictum states that this rule is only for candidates who demand a re-exam on medical or any other ground? which court has interpreted this provision the way you have elaborated? The rule only says that " there shall be no re-exam under any circumstances". Period. Any lawyer worth his salt would easily use this rule against FPSC. When teh rules clearly stipulate that there shall be no exam come what may howcome FPSC can take a re-exam of certain candidates. In future, please don't delve into the domain of others. You dont know jack about the law. Please avoid enlightening us with your ' legal interpretations'. Thank you. I would request you to join the petition by becoming a co-petitioner. That is the only avenue. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Wheeler For This Useful Post: | ||
Tauseef Dar (Sunday, November 24, 2013), venomous sophie (Monday, December 02, 2013) |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
when you people are you going to enter petition?means date etc?
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Please contact Barrister Waqas Mir at wmir.rma@gmail.com. He is dealing with the case.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Wheeler For This Useful Post: | ||
venomous sophie (Monday, December 02, 2013) |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
What contribution required? I will pay my part. I was failed in css 2012 in composition paper while essay was pass. And now failed in essay and composition paper is pass. What the hell is this?
__________________
M. shamaz saqib |
The Following User Says Thank You to shamaz For This Useful Post: | ||
venomous sophie (Thursday, December 19, 2013) |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Wheeler For This Useful Post: | ||
venomous sophie (Sunday, December 08, 2013) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Constitution of the United States | Muhammad Adnan | General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests | 3 | Saturday, February 01, 2020 02:25 AM |
Asma Jilani ---- Vs---- Govt. of the Punjab | sajidnuml | Constitutional Law | 5 | Saturday, November 11, 2017 06:00 PM |
Timeline: Judiciary vs executive | Call for Change | Current Affairs | 0 | Tuesday, June 19, 2012 06:14 PM |
All about Pakistan | Muhammad Adnan | General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests | 78 | Wednesday, May 16, 2012 09:50 PM |
Bhutto's statement in Supreme Court of Pakistan.... | Saleeqa Batool | Discussion | 1 | Wednesday, April 25, 2012 12:22 PM |