|
Share Thread: Facebook Twitter Google+ |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
US History Marks 2017
Seniors, please share your makrs.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Dear, I got 42...just managed to pass.
By the way, I was expecting somewhat around 55 to 60. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
50
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Anyone crossed 60 in US history? If someone has 60+ please share here. US history had an easy paper yet the marks are very low this year. I wonder what the checker was seeking.
__________________
There is no one to stop you from succeeding other than yourself |
The Following User Says Thank You to fawadhash For This Useful Post: | ||
megamind (Tuesday, October 10, 2017) |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
U.S. History paper was a bit tricky coupled with MCQs that were very difficult. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
And yes, you are right about US history paper. MCQs were bit tricky.
__________________
There is no one to stop you from succeeding other than yourself |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
yes US history paper of 2017 was not difficult,I think checkers gave low mars in those subjects which opt most of the candidates, this happens in CE 2017
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
41 just passed
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
risky
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
63
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Euro History 2017 marks | choochi | European History | 5 | Thursday, October 12, 2017 09:02 PM |
Observations on Performance of Candidates in Written Part of CSS Examination 2011 | Last Island | Subject Analysis | 2 | Wednesday, May 14, 2014 12:03 AM |
Observations on performance of candidates in Written Part of CSS Examination 2005 | Aarwaa | Subject Analysis | 4 | Sunday, February 17, 2008 11:21 PM |