Hi forum members,

I checked this thread and found it quite interesting to know that everyone is complaining about his marks in Journalism even doing best.

Dear we are not the checker of our papers and the checker of a subject like Journalism knows better than us how to judge or how to give marks. We only think that we did our best in the papers. If we are asked to check another papers then definitely our performance will come out to be in real terms. This has been our habit not to accept our weaknesses openly even though we know in our hearts.

What actually happens is that the answer we give for a question is 100% perfect in our terms but if its scrutiny is made or it is analytically checked even by ourselves tells us that the answer even does not cover the 25% requirement of that question; and that is the main reason we get less marks in that particular subject or question which we estimate 90%.
So dear do not change your subject when some of your friend or mine friend tell you that he got 40 marks even after completing all mcqs portion accurately because every person has different capability to deal a subject and to answer the question with a different angle.
I hope my opinion would not hurt anybody, however, i apologize for that if someone feels or minds my opinion as a criticism.

its destiny friends every time.plz remember me in ur prayers as CE 2011 means lot to me....