[QUOTE=ArifAwan;695198]Same topics, different titles![/QUOTE]
how ???:blink

in this situation what should an aspirant do?

would have attempted
Privatizing higher education-generating knowledge or making more money for the opulent

continuance of 2013 saga?
 

Paper was not tough but a great "pharo" one..sorry guys same episode of 2013 is expected to be repeated.may my words prove to be wrong but after seeing paper twice I reckon it could be tough time for those aspirants who prepared anticipated essays like bad governance or corruption or education system or economic challenges...wishing best of luck for all..

if anyone can post everyday science paper 2014???

[QUOTE=Schandenfreud;695104]Indeed a tricky one...i dont see an essay solely from point of having content...these are mostly current affairs topics and problem with such topics is that one knows about background and current information about such topics but people forget that it is an essay paper and approaching and navigating essay paper is different from how you approach current affairs...i being a person who has a knack for such topics knows how tricky they become..last year i attempted THERE should be limit to free speech and passed my exam but trick is to attempt an essay paper like an essay paper.. these topics when viewed superficialy seem easy but beneath that veneer lies a great and ardous undertaking..so not an easy paper and Essay will live up to its reputation of being MONSTER#1..watch out for the result.[/QUOTE]

will you please guide as how to attempt such topics as an essay?

[QUOTE=Zohaib Pervaiz;695064][U][SIZE="4"]Essay Paper 2014[/SIZE][/U]

8. Can meaning be fixed?
9. The character of a nation can be judged by its symbolic narrative.[/QUOTE]

can the seniors pleae put some light on these two topics?
how to comprehend them and attempt them?

privatizing education...generating knowledge or a source of minting money
 

dear brothers..... in this topic we had to take a stance in favour or against privatization....then we had to prove our argument with logic....
example: 1st logic: privatization has deteriorated higher education as rich people pay money and get admission in medical colleges,blatantly ignoring meritization....so privatization is not a good option
2nd logic: majority of pakistanis are poor and cannot afford private education...privatization would be akin to depriving the poor from a chance of upward mobility....
3 rd logic : higher education in balochistan and fata requires improving law and order not privatization as privatization in poor law and order situation would be a disaster...and balochis cannot afford private education
4th logic :privatization has become a source of earning money as many private uni are providing admissions in exchange for money,thereby.lowering the standard of education...
so this was required....we had to go in favour or against privatization with logic .... we were not required to write advantages and drawbacks of privatization....
remember.... dual approach results in ultimate failure...

[QUOTE=actor;695164]Women sportspersons as new ambassadors of soft image of Pakistan





OUTLINE



1) Introduction



2) Importance of women sports and Image of Pakistan



3) How women sportspersons can contribute in softening the image of Pakistan



4) Why image of Pakistan is needed to be softened



5) Outcome of encouraging women sports and image of Pakistan



6) Conclusion[/QUOTE]


You have done the best , simple to the point , however 4th point on 2nd would have made it exceptional . Thumbs up !

Great nations win without fighting:
few points which i mention in my outline.
1)introduction
2) great leaders which makes the nations great
- nelson mendal... Apartheid leader
- Mather Muhammad... Their reign achieve tit le of asian tiger
- Ronald regan... Make a team of intellectual in america
also mention japan example after world war 2... They quit war and achieve enivable position in comity of nations
to be continue have these point effective