Will India again go against Iran? - Page 2

THE 1 · #11 Sunday, November 20, 2005

Yes BMDD, i tend to agree with you in that area, one more wild card(like the 9/11 attacks), and boom, BUSH enters office again. However, from what I know of the Americans, even if they HAVE to fight a war, they'll have it done through another president, atleast not BUSH. However, my perceptions could be wrong, but let's see what happens. But trust me, USA is not gonna attack Iran, no matter what. Iraq was the last mistake, they're not making any more 'last' mistakes i guess. But lets just wait n see... Odds are, Syria will be attacked, reason being, Syria poses a major threat to baby Israel.

And as far as 'Bharat' is concerned, they're definitely gonna side up with the US against Iran.

Regards,

BUSHaRRaF

Satan · #12 Tuesday, November 22, 2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adil Memon

Salaam,

Thank you for your explanation, brother Satan. As far as I know, the custom of 2 terms for a President was set when George Washington (the first one) denied to take a third term (voluntarily) considering that could dilapidate the growth of democracy in their country.

I know FDR retained his post for 4 terms and died subsequently.

All I wanted to know... that how could FDR break the custom. Was FDR elected through elections, fair elections?

Thanks for telling about the 22nd Amendment. Best of Luck to Bush!

Let's see how does he pull a rabbit out of his hat!

Regards,
Adil Memon

Satan... please tell me about that!

Sorry for coming late to your query.

Yup he was elected via general elections in all 4 times.

The main problems, which he was facing in his political career, would arguably be the side effects of his licentious life.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BUSHaRRaF

Yes BMDD, i tend to agree with you in that area, one more wild card(like the 9/11 attacks), and boom, BUSH enters office again. However, from what I know of the Americans, even if they HAVE to fight a war, they'll have it done through another president, atleast not BUSH. However, my perceptions could be wrong, but let's see what happens. But trust me, USA is not gonna attack Iran, no matter what. Iraq was the last mistake, they're not making any more 'last' mistakes i guess. But lets just wait n see... Odds are, Syria will be attacked, reason being, Syria poses a major threat to baby Israel.

And as far as 'Bharat' is concerned, they're definitely gonna side up with the US against Iran.

Regards,

BUSHaRRaF

Agreed.

But I dont think that America is in a position to attack any country not even Syria. Locked in a stranglehold at this point of time.

Adil Memon · #13 Tuesday, November 22, 2005

Salaam,

Thanks for the answer once again. It's so nice of you!

Continuing...
America doesn't really intend to attack Syria yet, though it is hell-bent to impose sanctions. (though the incapability is also acknowledged)

Basharul Assad seems to be craving for the sanctions.

If the sanctions are imposed, international oil prices will be affected. Let's wait for the monster of inflation once again.

Regards,
Adil Memon

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Americas leaning heavivly towards India	Imtiaz Gondal	Current Affairs	4	Monday, August 05, 2019 07:33 PM
U.s. Nuclear Policy Toward Iran	fahad269	News & Articles	0	Sunday, December 23, 2007 08:15 PM
Iran's Nuclear Program.	MUKHTIAR ALI	Current Affairs	0	Saturday, January 20, 2007 07:13 PM
indo-pak relations	atifch	Current Affairs	0	Monday, December 11, 2006 09:01 PM
History of Iranian Nuclear Programme	Naseer Ahmed Chandio	News & Articles	0	Tuesday, May 30, 2006 02:07 PM