#11
|
|||
|
|||
Intentions of finder are probably malicious considering his number of posts etc however that does not means what he said was wrong.
Regardless of his intentions, what he said is thinkable. I know people will come up and say "Oh nuclear assets are not so simple to blow or take away" and "Oh pakistans nuclear assets are not in one place, they are in various unknown locations in parts" etc etc but the truth is that If americans can do such an operation in our soil near our military academy and near our capital then with some more planning and force they might figure a way out destroying and or damaging our nuclear assets sooner or later. This is the time our army and ISI and also our leadership needs to wake up, If proper and bold steps were not taken I am afraid soon we will not have what we are proud of today i.e Pakistan. If India, a much smaller and comparatively weaker country can take half of our country from us then USA (a super power) can do much more. Please this is time to be logical and rational rather than being emotional. Whom are you trying to fool If you still say our army is one of the best and so is our air force and ISI? Trust me, the ultimate fool will be us i.e pakistanis. Had we taken proper and required action against our military in 1971, by today pakistan would have been a far better and stronger nation. We are repeating the same mistake by supporting our army this time once again. The numbers are few comparatively but it's still sad, Mostly people (if you learn more about the public opinion) have lost all the respect for army, isi & air force. As for politicians, they were already ............ in the eyes of the public lol |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Dear Saqib and Hamza,
Hold on, you people are violating the rule of the forum, Do not make posts which are in any way offensive to others Restrict yourself to the topic Only.
__________________
Regards, ~ Riz ~ |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Rixwan For This Useful Post: | ||
Fading Glimpse (Saturday, May 14, 2011), khuhro (Friday, May 13, 2011), Rayaan Haider (Saturday, May 14, 2011), SADIA SHAFIQ (Friday, May 13, 2011) |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
@finder
Its totally disappointing statement. In case, Osama's end episode is admitted to be true, yet we cannot think of surrendering our Nuclear assets at any cost. Many devils are away from us just becaue we are Nuclear Power. I am surprised, if USA conducted operation unilaterly, and left immediately, then how our (pakistani) stakeholders immediately believed that Osama was there, killed and taken.? Maybe its true, but the way they operated and ended it raises many eyebrows. It seems they have staged it to get their some special demands (likely to come on surface in near future) fulfilled ratcheting up pressure on us. Whatever the case, the statement of finder is exceptionable.
__________________
There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in. |
The Following User Says Thank You to unsolved_Mystery For This Useful Post: | ||
muhammad_essa (Saturday, May 14, 2011) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
this is what finder said Quote:
__________________
Puppet,Slave,Lover |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
If you disagree with the above, kindly Explain How is it not logical for a neutral person to come to the conclusion that either Pakistan was intentionally hiding OBL (Makes them a rogue state) or They really did not know he was there and had no Idea of the raid by usa (makes them an incompetent state). Please Elaborate with what you call "Logic" how is this conclusion wrong to draw because I find it very logical and understandable. The only thing required is thinking out of the box and not being emotional |
The Following User Says Thank You to mukt For This Useful Post: | ||
Hamza Salick (Tuesday, September 13, 2011) |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
@M.J..no doubt..even I agree what he said was wrong..I dont agree to it,u dont agree to it,nobody here agrees to it..but my point is:WE cant take away his right to say so..we dont have the right to tell him to shutup..we can refuse his point of view..but not his right to have a point of view..if we believe in democracy then we shud listen to him,refute him,but NOT malign him..
'I strongly disapprove of what u say,but I shall to my death,fight for ur right to say so'..Dis should be the spirit |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
When "x" says 2+2 = 4, and then later on "x" says 100+100 = 500 and I say I agree with "x" that does not mean I also agree with his wrong portion which is 100+100 = 500 Similarly when I said what he said was correct was in reference to his statement that either pakistan is an incompetent state or a rogue state because the reasons he gave were logical. I, However, As a Pakistani, do not agree that pakistan should handover it's nuclear assets but they should strive real hard now and should punish the army, ISI and air force severely and humiliate them for their blunder and make sure this does not happen in future because this is not the first time our army commits blunders and we cannot simply ignore them all the time, indirectly we are making them incompetent this way |
The Following User Says Thank You to mukt For This Useful Post: | ||
Hamza Salick (Friday, May 13, 2011) |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
lets come to discussion and avoid personal attacks ..I strongly disagree that nuclear assets will be destroyed or any kind of it.This was the first benefit which we received from Zulfiqar.....
nuclear arsenals are quite safe in Pakistan and one not to worry about this but only thing which i wana say that it is a part of U.S.A conspiracy and we should understand it very well ...our aggressive tone toward high echelon will create a trust deficit and this, THIS is the only thing which will lead to collapse further already destroyed social set up
__________________
"Wa tu izzu man-ta shaa, wa tu zillu man-ta shaa" |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Excuse me, this is totaly insane to talk of handing over of our nuclear bombs/ capability to USA. You people better to discuss the issues related to you. This is none of your business to decide whether the nukes should go to home. Try to play your due role for nation building at your own capacity. If you will try to foot yourself in others shoes, which are rather quite bigger for you, you will simply jump down.. So please dont discuss such topics. !
__________________
'Thee woh ik shakhs kay tasawar saay - abb woh ranayee khayal kahaan' |
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Muhammad T S Awan For This Useful Post: | ||
ArifAwan (Saturday, May 14, 2011), candidguy (Saturday, May 14, 2011), Fading Glimpse (Saturday, May 14, 2011), fitman (Saturday, May 14, 2011), Hamza Salick (Saturday, May 14, 2011), SADIA SHAFIQ (Saturday, May 14, 2011), Saqib Shah (Saturday, May 14, 2011) |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Together we can bring the change, united we stand divided we fall. We, the youth, can change the fate of our nation. We need to work hard and focus on our education. We have to remain honest and loyal to our country in any capacity whether as a clerk or top military general or civilian officer. Remember, our nation is not less than any country in the world. We have well trained bureaucracy, well organized army, nuclear arms, strategic position, beautiful weather, huge mineral and natural resources. We just need a single leader, who will definitely rise among you and you will see our country rising and shining in the world. Insha Allah. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Xeric For This Useful Post: | ||
SADIA SHAFIQ (Saturday, May 14, 2011), very special 1 (Monday, September 19, 2011) |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
development of pakistan press since 1947 | Janeeta | Journalism & Mass Communication | 15 | Tuesday, May 05, 2020 03:04 AM |
History of Presidentship in Pakistan | Naseer Ahmed Chandio | General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests | 1 | Tuesday, May 31, 2011 03:00 PM |
Important C.A topics for CE 2011..! | Maha Khan | Current Affairs | 1 | Sunday, January 30, 2011 09:56 AM |
China's Nuclear Environment and the US Theatre Missile Defence Initiative | Nek Muhammad | International Relations | 0 | Monday, July 05, 2010 05:38 PM |
History of Iranian Nuclear Programme | Naseer Ahmed Chandio | News & Articles | 0 | Tuesday, May 30, 2006 02:07 PM |