#41
|
|||
|
|||
the track record of CJ,s justice done during 'post lawyers movement era';
1] zardari bashing and skipping nawaz,s cases 2]suo moto on missing persons(most of them are terrorists'blauch insurgents,anti-army elements). and...ignoring the target killings of HAZARAS. 3] releasing 29 hardcore terrorists from karachi jail. while neglecting many innocent citizens still in jails. 4]all the cases of NAWAZ FAMILY are on STAY . 5]vigorously interpreting the article 248. but, no word for defacto ruler of the punjab.( CM SHIP OF SHAHBAZ IS CHALLENGED IN HIGH COURT LAHORE ON HIS CRIMINAL BASES). still A pending case. IF, CM is right,why don,t you pen down verdict in cm,s favour? And, if , he is wrong then why the decision is on STAY? 6] skirmishes with federal government on judicial appointment in SC. but ,no practical step forward against corruption in lower courts. 7]where is the case of MUSHARRAF(article 6)? 8] why taking sides with PML(N)? 9] at many points,he could ravage zardari regime.but, skipped the bright moments. why? ------all is not fine with the sitting leader of judiciary. in my assessment, CJP IS ENDEAVOURING FOR, AND SECURING HIS FUTURE POLITICAL CAREER. |
The Following User Says Thank You to ali emraan For This Useful Post: | ||
Irtika (Monday, July 02, 2012) |
#42
|
||||
|
||||
Chief justice shud have kept an eye over wht his son was doing, no doubt c.j is an honest man he is our nati0n's hero
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Thats not the case! CJ is not skipping Nawaz, but the government does on many instances! as the incumbent govt wants to harmonize relations with opposition CJ has already discussed the situation with military persons, and CJ emphasized law enforcement agencies to normalize the situation of balochistan. Releasing hardcore terrorist, coz of the insufficient proof. Law consider proofs, so you cannot blame judiciary for it. The law enforcement agencies must bring solid proofs against the accused ones. What about the secret deal between musharraf and PPP? NAB has already followed the order of president for not taking nawaz and co to the task. PLEASE don't blame CJ for bad acts of others. COME UP with solid analysis. AND a big LOL for your last point |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
One more thing,I am not a jiala..Lol
__________________
Ali da malang. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
CJ may not be corrupt perosn but his son surely is.He has a tainted character which is an open secret now but CJ has taken a suo motu action of his son's case and it has yet to conclude legally.Hopefully justice shall be meted out evenly.
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
you are so much against cj that all my statements will be like casting pearls before swine. you have made your mind against cj and no logic can turn it. I have given reason to you and will give you more but but I cant give you conscience to you, which is required here.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to idrees khan For This Useful Post: | ||
shoaib khan12 (Saturday, July 28, 2012) |
#47
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
LOVE all, TRUST a few, do WRONG to none...... |
#48
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Ali da malang. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
The precondition for existence of a higher humanity is not the state, but the nation possessing the necessary ability. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
well strange logical point,You want to sue WAPDA ,before going to the copmlication in the procdure of sue moto action, you should bear it in your mind brother that it is your beloved GOVT that head the WAPDA dept. So its the GOVT that responsible for that bad governance .app ko court jana he nahi phrta if you have a competent GOVT ,which unfortunatly we havent.
Secondly you alleged that cj is confronting with the parilament, its totally basless ,if it were true then the cj would not have refered in the issue of appointment method of judges in the 18th amendment,. He has showed high estimation for the parilament but you know that it takes two to make a clap ,Got it dear |
The Following User Says Thank You to idrees khan For This Useful Post: | ||
Asif3531 (Tuesday, July 03, 2012) |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Asma Jilani ---- Vs---- Govt. of the Punjab | sajidnuml | Constitutional Law | 5 | Saturday, November 11, 2017 06:00 PM |
Constitution (Eighteenth Amendment) Act, 2010 | bushra masood | Current Affairs | 0 | Friday, June 29, 2012 12:52 PM |
President overrides CJ’s recommendation on judges’ elevation; SC suspends Zardari’s | niazikhan2 | News & Articles | 0 | Sunday, February 14, 2010 07:40 AM |