لكم دينكم ولي دين

But why is it necessary that everything should be resolved in Supreme Court with suo moto. It doesn't happen anywhere besides here. Even giant multinational companies like Apple and Samsung fight their legal battles in local District Courts, why here we must go to Supreme Court only

@asif 3531

-----do you have any proof of CJ,s discussion with military officials regarding terrorism?
-----if malik ishaq confesses publicaly atleast in every rally that he has killed 100 people. then, do you need anymore proof?
my innocent bro, don,t cook fish in the mud!
----- NAB has also got orders from the president for not writing letter to swiss court. but, CJ reiterated to write the letter. and on this issue, DISMISSED THE PM.

but, the LEVEL OF LENIENCY towards PML(N) is exceptional.
the following are the cases which are pending in the court;
1]hudabiya paper mills
2] qarz utaro mulk sanwaro (needsuo moto notice)
3]the eligibility of shahbaz sharif (case on stay in lhr HC)
4]baidyan plot scandal (623 acres property jeopardiized by
hamza shahbaz(case pending in lhc since 2010)
5]from where he got flats in PARK LANE LONDON?(suo moto
required)

-----

__________________
ali imraan

CJ is doing his work within his constitutional boundaries. When a ruling Government does not pay attention and implement the rules and regulations, then what could CJ of Sc can do. Thats why the lower courts has the bad situation.

dear for your kind information all courts are under of sc, its responsibility of cj to take care of lower courts. thing is that he only wants his own superiority and fame.

__________________
LOVE all, TRUST a few, do WRONG to none......

here it is quite pertinent to show the article, which portraying the real picture of our apex court.....


ISLAMABAD July 2: The National Accountability Bureau said on Monday that cases against PML-N chief Nawaz Sharif and Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif had not been closed and that a committee had been formed to look into fresh reference filed against him in April this year by then Interior Minister Rehman Malik.

A statement issued by NAB Chairman Admiral (retd) Fasih Bokhari soon after a meeting with senior officials of the bureau, said: “Proceedings on cases against Nawaz Sharif and Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif are under process as per provisions of the National Accountability Ordinance 1999.”

But the statement contradicts what the NAB chief had said at his last news conference. He had claimed that no case was being investigated against any politician, including the Sharif brothers.

At that news conference, Admiral (retd) Bokhari said that President Asif Ali Zardrai had instructed him not to reopen politically-motivated cases. “President Zardari asked me not to use NAB as a tool against politicians or for political victimisation,” he said.

In his statement on Monday, the NAB chairman said that a committee had been formed under the chairmanship of NAB’s Prosecutor General of Accountability to review the reference forwarded through the National Crisis Management Cell of the ministry of interior.

“The committee is at its final stage to formulate recommendations in the said case. These recommendations will then be presented in the Executive Board Meeting for further proceedings in the case,” he said.

And NAB’s spokesperson said that three references — wilful loan default, Hudaibia Paper Mills and assets beyond known sources of income — were pending in the accountability court.

Ayesha Siddiqa, the head of NAB’s media team, said the bureau had filed an application for reopening the cases but the court refused to accept its point of view and adjourned the cases sine die. In 2010, NAB again moved an application for recommencement of these cases but its plea was rejected by the court. In October 2011, the Sharif brothers filed a writ petition in the Lahore High Court, seeking quashment of the references and the court issued a stay order in their favour.

In the three cases already tried in accountability courts, the Sharif brothers were accused of defaulting on Rs4.9 billion loans obtained from nine different banks in 1994-95.

In January, the Supreme Court upheld the judgment of the Lahore High Court and directed NAB to release all assets of the Sharif family. The bench dismissed an appeal of NAB’s Prosecutor General K.K. Agha seeking leave against the Lahore High Court’s Oct 4, 2011, judgment and directed NAB authorities to return Rs115 million and properties of M/S Hudabiya Paper Mills Limited, lying with the National Bank of Pakistan in Islamabad.

NAB’s Prosecutor General KK Agha had informed the Supreme Court that before leaving for Saudi Arabia in Dec 2002, Nawaz Sharif had consented to return the money to NAB under an agreement.

Besides these three cases, Mr Rehman Malik on April 28 accused the Sharif family of robbing 31 banks, development financial institutions (DFIs) and non-banking financial institutions of over Rs6 billion to build their industrial empire.

Leaders of the opposition party were accused of illegally extracting the money for 19 industrial units owned by the family from banks and DFIs which were forced to make the payment.

They were also accused of defaulting on payment of $32 million for paper manufacturing machinery leased from the UK-based Altowfeek company for investment funds limited in February 1995.

source Dawn news ...... for reply from those who think the cj is pious,,,,

__________________
LOVE all, TRUST a few, do WRONG to none......

janab before raising finger to others we should justify himself that what we we have played role in society here people are suffering great hunger,unemployment,loadsheding and many other crises. cj may not want to let country into darken and pushing continuously to the ruling party which is ppp govt so he may be maintaining balance in order to keep country prosper.
hamary han ek chote se story hy shayad woh yaha pe koi madad kare
"ek shaks ki chori hogaye tu us ne choron ko talash karna shru kia jab use pata chala ke phala log hen jinhon ne chori ki hy ek syed tha ek soomro aur ek mughal tha tu banda gharib tha is waja se soch raha the choron se kese saman waps karwao choro ke pas ja ke kaha bhai ye tu syed hy hamara murshid aur mughal hamare badshah reh chuke hin magr soomro ne mere choori kyun ki is tarah se us bande ne ek ek kar ke saaron ko joote maare aur apna saman wapas liya'.
dear i think if time given to cj he wll bring all corrupt persons into account one by one

Guys when king henry compelled sir thomas more , the lord chancellor ,for an illicit act he did not agrree to kings proposal and work according to the law .he embraced death but did not go against his conscience.my popint is that it is not only in pak but over the world have unscrupulous politicians.we need statesman not politicians.Now preident zardari bring another corrupt man to fill the boots of pm.does raja pervz ashraf deserve it,obviously not but zardari want direct conflict with judiciary but the cj is not in that mood.

dear i think you want to say that, every one in Pakistan is a corrupt person except cj, for exp. zardari, gillani, raja, etc. in your point of view who is able to became pm? are their any one who is able to take this responsibility. no one is perfect in this world, if we want to search a perfect man for this post it will remain empty till the end.........

dear i quoted an article from dawn news would you like to give some suggestions about the article and statements given by nab officers,,,,,,,,,,,,

__________________
LOVE all, TRUST a few, do WRONG to none......

Well i totally disagree here , coz it's my right And the facts which you've mentioned here,these are nothing more than allegations . . And case is very much clear, it's regarding (Arsalan) not about Iftikhar chaudary. . i even did not added iftikhar behind Arsalan because he is an individual. And His excellency CJ did not even sat in bench just because of Arsalan being his son. And now the ball is in government's court, lets c what does NAB do. . Why don't you acknowledge facts regarding Mr Z and G??? because they've got Immunity??? what sort of immunity??? aren't they humans like us?? Kaun c makhlooq hain woh?? We people will never let anyone do some thing right, where was malik bahria earlier?? Why did he came on screen when Gillani's case was under ruling?? This was all pre-planned just to change the people's mind. . . Our media gets the credit here. . !!

Had chahiye saza mein uqubat k waste
Akhir gunahgar hun, kafir nahi hun main

'Ghalib' wazifakhwar ho, do shah ko dua
wo din gaye k kehte the "naukar nahi hun main"

Regards.

__________________
Dekha hai aino'n ko paseene se tarba tar. . .
Ya Rab! haqeeqato'n se koi aashna na ho. . .

Thats the problem na brother . i did not say that all are corrupt but they lack will ,and determination . some good names are also there in the likes of QIRA,RAZA RABBANI,ATIZAZAND KHURSHED SHAH but your beloved president do not select them rather he select the most incompetent ,corrupt and unpopular man for the the supreme post of chief exective. It sent a strong message to the judiciary that we will confront you.Most of the foreign diplomates also showed their reservation but who cares,We support democracy but not corrupition and bad governance, oppertunity knocks once not twice. they have already spoiled their chances but the irony of faith is that men like you still support them . i dont know why