Sunday, May 05, 2024
02:17 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > General > Discussion

Discussion Discuss current affairs and issues helpful in CSS only.

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Saturday, July 28, 2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In my Mom's heart
Posts: 208
Thanks: 484
Thanked 113 Times in 73 Posts
samia fakhar is on a distinguished road
Default future plan of Obama for Pakistan?

I am giving the reference of the book written in America by David E. Sanger :
CONFRONT AND CONCEAL: Obama's secret wars and suprising use of American power.
According to author there are three basic objectives of Obama in Pakistan
1) To destabilise the nuclear programme of Pakistan
2)Control of Taliban in Afghanistan
3) To target the hideouts or lairs of Al qaida in Pakistan...
What do you people think is it possible in long run?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Saturday, July 28, 2012
alihashmatkhoso's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Karachi, now Lahore .
Posts: 773
Thanks: 431
Thanked 854 Times in 468 Posts
alihashmatkhoso has a spectacular aura aboutalihashmatkhoso has a spectacular aura aboutalihashmatkhoso has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samia fakhar View Post
I am giving the reference of the book written in America by David E. Sanger :
CONFRONT AND CONCEAL: Obama's secret wars and suprising use of American power.
According to author there are three basic objectives of Obama in Pakistan
1) To destabilise the nuclear programme of Pakistan
2)Control of Taliban in Afghanistan
3) To target the hideouts or lairs of Al qaida in Pakistan...
What do you people think is it possible in long run?
it isn't possible, Pakistan changing its polices towards usa and i think you you went through the current foreign policy of Pakistan it is totally change. i am agree that above statement is true and obhama is thinking for that but it impossible along with Pakistan many other countries like China, Russia and so many Muslim countries don,t leave a stone to halt it. by the way in future usa isn't able to do so. The great game is going on you know very well about it no need to explain. america losing his power day by day. america's economy declining. china and India going to take over it. in these circumstances how its possible???????? never ever it is not possible all dreams of obhama will dashed on ground...
__________________
LOVE all, TRUST a few, do WRONG to none......
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to alihashmatkhoso For This Useful Post:
memon bilal (Friday, August 17, 2012), NoorMBA (Saturday, July 28, 2012), samia fakhar (Saturday, July 28, 2012)
  #3  
Old Saturday, July 28, 2012
Samee Khan's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 11
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Samee Khan is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samia fakhar View Post
I am giving the reference of the book written in America by David E. Sanger :
CONFRONT AND CONCEAL: Obama's secret wars and suprising use of American power.
According to author there are three basic objectives of Obama in Pakistan
1) To destabilise the nuclear programme of Pakistan
2)Control of Taliban in Afghanistan
3) To target the hideouts or lairs of Al qaida in Pakistan...
What do you people think is it possible in long run?
Option 1 is quite possible. . .although Pakistani govt nd army claims that their nuclear programme is in safe hands. . .but i think Americans wont fall for it. . .they are pretty sure that these Nuclear Weapons would be used against Allies in the future. . .and they would try their level best to destabilise and nuetralise the nuclear programme of Pakistan. But option 2 and 3 are literally immpossible. . .Talibans in Aghanistan can never be domesticated. . .they are wild animals and they would remain lyk that forever!!!
__________________
“if you want to shine like sun first you have to burn like it.”
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Samee Khan For This Useful Post:
samia fakhar (Saturday, July 28, 2012)
  #4  
Old Saturday, July 28, 2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Digri, Mirpurkhas
Posts: 273
Thanks: 65
Thanked 184 Times in 114 Posts
shakeel ghori is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samia fakhar View Post
I am giving the reference of the book written in America by David E. Sanger :
CONFRONT AND CONCEAL: Obama's secret wars and suprising use of American power.
According to author there are three basic objectives of Obama in Pakistan
1) To destabilise the nuclear programme of Pakistan
2)Control of Taliban in Afghanistan
3) To target the hideouts or lairs of Al qaida in Pakistan...
What do you people think is it possible in long run?
Much more is going on covertly in this so-called war on terror beyond its said objectives. The world is being persuaded by the US that this is an effort to eliminate terror from the earth to save humanity from the giant hands of terrorism, but in reality those who claim to be the custodians of humanity are the biggest terrorists. This can be understood easily from their self-serving activities which are just detrimental for the humanity. There are many reasons for which they are spending so huge amount of money and suffering damage in the form of human lose. It is apparent from the wild struggle of US that it is just trying to get hold in the south Asia to sustain its economic and political power.

On the one hand, US is trying to win over the trust of western countries by proving that it has suffered great damage for being the leader of NATO and other alliances in on going on terror. On the other, it is actively engaged in establishing its hegemony over the Asian countries. No doubt that one of its objectives is to weaken the Pakistan's stability which is the fortification of Muslim world. Much US has succeeded in its attempt because Pakistan's unwilling or willing participation in the war on terror has harmed it a lot in the form of lose in precious lives and material. It is very possible that the US wants a final blow on us by destabilizing our nuclear power. We should hope for better and pray from Allah that may this never happen.

As far as control over Taliban is concerned, it seems that the external powers could never happen to do so. The well-equiped and well-trained NATO forces have been fighting against them over a decade, but they did not succeed in their aim. Now they are planning to withdraw from the afghan pretending as if they succeeded in what they claimed. After there withdrawal now this all will have to be borne by this region and its people as it happened in the past as well when US withdrew from the afghan after defeating soviet. In the wake of economic crisis we were all left in lurch to bear the brunt of harsh circumstances

Both Pakistan and Afghanistan are in the same boat, and the massive damage they both suffered for the cause of this war are also the same. Now it will be sensible if they both try to find a pragmatic solutions of their problems instead of involving any foreign power, as this will only disturb the peace in the region.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to shakeel ghori For This Useful Post:
samia fakhar (Saturday, July 28, 2012)
  #5  
Old Saturday, July 28, 2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In my Mom's heart
Posts: 208
Thanks: 484
Thanked 113 Times in 73 Posts
samia fakhar is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samee Khan View Post
Option 1 is quite possible. . .although Pakistani govt nd army claims that their nuclear programme is in safe hands. . .but i think Americans wont fall for it. . .they are pretty sure that these Nuclear Weapons would be used against Allies in the future. . .and they would try their level best to destabilise and nuetralise the nuclear programme of Pakistan. But option 2 and 3 are literally immpossible. . .Talibans in Aghanistan can never be domesticated. . .they are wild animals and they would remain lyk that forever!!!
but if this is the case means our nuclear weapons are not in safe hands? we can be made without it? if this is so then there is possibility that anti American forces can snatch the control of assest? if this is the situation then it is very dangerous..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Saturday, July 28, 2012
Samee Khan's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 11
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Samee Khan is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samia fakhar View Post
but if this is the case means our nuclear weapons are not in safe hands? we can be made without it? if this is so then there is possibility that anti American forces can snatch the control of assest? if this is the situation then it is very dangerous..
Pakistan is the only Muslim country which possess nuclear arms. . .so in this regard Pakistan is very important for the Muslim World. . .nd dont worry taliban wont get hold of our Nuclear Weapons. . .the biggest danger to our nuclear arms is from America nd Israel. . .!!!!
__________________
“if you want to shine like sun first you have to burn like it.”
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Sunday, July 29, 2012
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 46
Thanks: 6
Thanked 25 Times in 20 Posts
desertrain is on a distinguished road
Default

Considering Talibans- so America is never going to conquer them. Getting a complete hold of them is out of Question. The war will continue till American presence here.

For Pakistan , the American presence in Afghanistan definitely has ill- consequences like we see them in our everyday life.
But if they ever decide to leave , for Pakistan it would be like getting out of frying pan and Jumping into the Fire.

Its because , If America , the super power couldnt stop and take control of Taliban then what do you think , after American withdrawl from Afghanistan will taliban stop their expansion ?
Their main Ideology is Expansion-

In few days Afghanistan would be under their control and after that their stoppage is impossible.

Pakistan would be their next target and what I beleive is that getting hold of this country would be quite easy for them.
As a huge majority of our people are already in their favour especially Pukhtuns of KPK.

So , for Obama , accomplishing the second option is impossible.

Destabilization of Nuclear assets- hmm, I dont think its their first priority cus they have already got what they wanted.
The problems that they have created for Pakistan will take decades to resolve.

The strategies of war have now changed- its an economic war. If pakistani agencies fails to tackle the situation adroitly then the consequencies we face would be quite alarming.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Sunday, July 29, 2012
sabahatbhutta's Avatar
42nd CTP (PAAS)
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2013 - Merit 66
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Multan
Posts: 569
Thanks: 475
Thanked 657 Times in 291 Posts
sabahatbhutta is a splendid one to beholdsabahatbhutta is a splendid one to beholdsabahatbhutta is a splendid one to beholdsabahatbhutta is a splendid one to beholdsabahatbhutta is a splendid one to beholdsabahatbhutta is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samia fakhar View Post
I am giving the reference of the book written in America by David E. Sanger :
CONFRONT AND CONCEAL: Obama's secret wars and suprising use of American power.
According to author there are three basic objectives of Obama in Pakistan
1) To destabilise the nuclear programme of Pakistan
2)Control of Taliban in Afghanistan
3) To target the hideouts or lairs of Al qaida in Pakistan...
What do you people think is it possible in long run?
These are long term objectives of America, as Obama may not be able to remain president of America for a long time.
objective no. 1 is quite deplorable as I think America wants to eliminate our nuclear assets rather destabilise it, she would never destabilise it. Because America knows that Pakistanis are more dangerous when they are in havoc.
No.2 is American desire but practically it is unachievable.
No.3 is already in action, my dear. As America is targeting hide-outs and lairs of Al-Qaeda and Taliban by drone attacks.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Sunday, July 29, 2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 95
Thanks: 102
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts
enchanted is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shakeel ghori View Post
There are many reasons for which they are spending so huge amount of money and suffering damage in the form of human lose. It is apparent from the wild struggle of US that it is just trying to get hold in the south Asia to sustain its economic and political power.
how its ecnomic power is being sustained by a war?and what are the advantages superpower is gaining by this war?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old Sunday, July 29, 2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Digri, Mirpurkhas
Posts: 273
Thanks: 65
Thanked 184 Times in 114 Posts
shakeel ghori is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enchanted View Post
how its ecnomic power is being sustained by a war?and what are the advantages superpower is gaining by this war?
The advantages which it has foreseen to obtain from this war are to get hold over the south Asian and central Asian countries which are rich in their resources. Analysts have concluded that the hidden and unexplored oil reserves of the central Asia are the main focus of US. In addition, it is grabbing a lot of money from the western countries by justifying and gaining their sympathies for its position in this war.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to shakeel ghori For This Useful Post:
enchanted (Sunday, July 29, 2012), samia fakhar (Monday, July 30, 2012)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ecnomic progress Vs Political situation very special 1 Discussion 48 Wednesday, February 29, 2012 10:27 PM
Barak Obama's History Sunny Khan General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 1 Friday, February 27, 2009 12:10 AM
Report of Technical Commitee on Water Resources Yasir Hayat Khan General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 0 Monday, January 16, 2006 02:53 AM
Technical Report on water resources A Soul Pakistan Affairs 2 Wednesday, December 28, 2005 10:45 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.