Saturday, April 27, 2024
01:19 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > General > Discussion

Discussion Discuss current affairs and issues helpful in CSS only.

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Sunday, October 07, 2012
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
roshini is on a distinguished road
Default CNG v/s LPG

Poorly controlled use of CNG in transport sector is causing fast depletion of natural gas reservoirs. so Government is thinking to promote LPG instead of CNG although it will be more costly for us. kindly put some light on this issue aspirants.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to roshini For This Useful Post:
multithinker (Monday, October 08, 2012)
  #2  
Old Sunday, October 07, 2012
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,549
Thanks: 618
Thanked 1,122 Times in 674 Posts
mhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud of
Default

A short cited insistence only to take attention away from one shortage to create another. LPG is mixture of gases primarily containing butane and propane, both of which are again by products of natural gas and petroleum, i.e. prone to shortage in future. Besides extra cost, LPG is dangerous for both environment and health. Butane is a gas in liquified form that does not evaporate quickly like CNG, so there are more risks of explosions.
__________________
The precondition for existence of a higher humanity is not the state, but the nation possessing the necessary ability.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mhmmdkashif For This Useful Post:
roshini (Monday, October 08, 2012)
  #3  
Old Monday, October 08, 2012
multithinker's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Nawabshah
Posts: 40
Thanks: 199
Thanked 24 Times in 17 Posts
multithinker is on a distinguished road
Lightbulb LPG is better then CNG

Quote:
Originally Posted by roshini View Post
Poorly controlled use of CNG in transport sector is causing fast depletion of natural gas reservoirs. so Government is thinking to promote LPG instead of CNG although it will be more costly for us. kindly put some light on this issue aspirants.

You are right , but LPG is better because it have only 13% risk to create damages . and less precautions . But CNG need more care and testing , even it is expensive to install a high pressure cylinder.

Government have power to make things easier for public. If they support LPG production industries and make 100% LPG in Pakistan rather than importing , it will reduce the cost. even they can make better the loss some custom on pre-installed LPG kit vehicles which assemble in Pakistan.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to multithinker For This Useful Post:
roshini (Monday, October 08, 2012)
  #4  
Old Monday, October 08, 2012
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
roshini is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhmmdkashif View Post
A short cited insistence only to take attention away from one shortage to create another. LPG is mixture of gases primarily containing butane and propane, both of which are again by products of natural gas and petroleum, i.e. prone to shortage in future. Besides extra cost, LPG is dangerous for both environment and health. Butane is a gas in liquified form that does not evaporate quickly like CNG, so there are more risks of explosions.
yes you are right its more harmful and even it would again create energy crises then why government is trying to do this mess? our Govt must try to solve these crises by other means..

Quote:
Originally Posted by multithinker View Post
You are right , but LPG is better because it have only 13% risk to create damages . and less precautions . But CNG need more care and testing , even it is expensive to install a high pressure cylinder.

Government have power to make things easier for public. If they support LPG production industries and make 100% LPG in Pakistan rather than importing , it will reduce the cost. even they can make better the loss some custom on pre-installed LPG kit vehicles which assemble in Pakistan.
yea CNG is more explosive but its a green gas it's not polluting our environment but LPG would definitely do, as Mr mhmmdkashif already explained.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Monday, October 08, 2012
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,549
Thanks: 618
Thanked 1,122 Times in 674 Posts
mhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud ofmhmmdkashif has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roshini View Post
yes you are right its more harmful and even it would again create energy crises then why government is trying to do this mess? our Govt must try to solve these crises by other means..
The government, for over 60 years, had lived in a delusional paranoia i.e. fear of Indian takeover or Indian conspiracy; and suddenly it has woke up to the reality that economy, social justice, rule of law and welfare is vital for state's security and long term existence. Now its just boggling ways to do it but it seems poor government just does not know how to manage it . The problem is not with current PPP government, future governments would also face similar challenges and solutions require drastic socioeconomic and sociopolitical measures which I am afraid no government would be able or willing to take.


Quote:
Originally Posted by roshini View Post
yea CNG is more explosive but its a green gas it's not polluting our environment but LPG would definitely do, as Mr mhmmdkashif already explained.
Both CNG (natural gas in compressed form) and LPG are equally explosive. As CNG is natural gas (methane) which is liquified under high pressure, it is not as portable as LPG which is butane or propane (weather also plays a part which gas you use as LPG ), gases that liquify under low pressures and therefore are portable. Now in case of leakages LPG is more dangerous as its molecular weight is heavier than air therefore it does not evaporate as quickly as CNG. If you have a leakage in CNG the time threshold during which danger lingers around is significantly shorter compared to LPG. Nevertheless both are equally dangerous in terms of explosiveness .

Besides, health and environmental issues with LPG are significantly greater than with CNG.
__________________
The precondition for existence of a higher humanity is not the state, but the nation possessing the necessary ability.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.