Wednesday, May 08, 2024
12:13 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > Other Competitive Examinations > National Accountability Bureau (NAB)

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #2661  
Old Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Lahore
Posts: 46
Thanks: 3
Thanked 102 Times in 29 Posts
HassanNaqvi is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Megaadeeel View Post
Hearing is neither on 16th nor on 17th January. The information provided by Mr. Hassan Naqvi is not authentic and quite vulnerable as per my knowledge.
Dear all I apologize for spreading this information about the date of hearing I conveyed what was told to me from the IHC computer section and today the same guy called from the IHC and told me that there was some misunderstanding at their office as the case was fixed for 22.01 and not for today I just told him the number of the petition and he told me the title and other related things
All the remaining info that I have been sharing is authentic as u can see that already I had said that the only issue was of stay from current employees, now again I have shared the date of 22.01 as conveyed from IHC.

All other information was first hand and was authentic and this date info was second hand but has been corrected. But as he has already made a mistake I shall not say that this is also authentic till the list of cases has been loaded to IHC website.

In addition to the above I will try and upload the order sheet tonight
Regards
Hassan Naqvi
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to HassanNaqvi For This Useful Post:
Dahmash khan (Wednesday, January 16, 2013), janojannan (Wednesday, January 16, 2013), kamran_shaikh (Friday, January 18, 2013), The Impregnable (Wednesday, January 16, 2013), Xeeshan Ali (Wednesday, January 16, 2013)
  #2662  
Old Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Quetta
Posts: 72
Thanks: 8
Thanked 19 Times in 14 Posts
Megaadeeel is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HassanNaqvi View Post
Dear all I apologize for spreading this information about the date of hearing I conveyed what was told to me from the IHC computer section and today the same guy called from the IHC and told me that there was some misunderstanding at their office as the case was fixed for 22.01 and not for today I just told him the number of the petition and he told me the title and other related things
All the remaining info that I have been sharing is authentic as u can see that already I had said that the only issue was of stay from current employees, now again I have shared the date of 22.01 as conveyed from IHC.

All other information was first hand and was authentic and this date info was second hand but has been corrected. But as he has already made a mistake I shall not say that this is also authentic till the list of cases has been loaded to IHC website.

In addition to the above I will try and upload the order sheet tonight
Regards
Hassan Naqvi
I have no doubt over your intentions, dear. May be it was due to some mis communication as you pointed out. My friend works at NAB Quetta, he told me that there is no such hearing scheduled on 16th or 17th January. When I asked him about the date of hearing, he said, "I will communicate it to you later"
May be it is on 22nd January as Mr. Hassan pointed out. I will share the info as soon as I hear from my friend.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Megaadeeel For This Useful Post:
Dahmash khan (Wednesday, January 16, 2013), kamran_shaikh (Friday, January 18, 2013), newhere (Thursday, January 17, 2013)
  #2663  
Old Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 88
Thanks: 16
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Dahmash khan is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HassanNaqvi View Post
Dear all I apologize for spreading this information about the date of hearing I conveyed what was told to me from the IHC computer section and today the same guy called from the IHC and told me that there was some misunderstanding at their office as the case was fixed for 22.01 and not for today I just told him the number of the petition and he told me the title and other related things
All the remaining info that I have been sharing is authentic as u can see that already I had said that the only issue was of stay from current employees, now again I have shared the date of 22.01 as conveyed from IHC.

All other information was first hand and was authentic and this date info was second hand but has been corrected. But as he has already made a mistake I shall not say that this is also authentic till the list of cases has been loaded to IHC website.

In addition to the above I will try and upload the order sheet tonight
Regards
Hassan Naqvi
brother plz share it again when this date is confirmed. i will be grateful
Reply With Quote
  #2664  
Old Thursday, January 17, 2013
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 58
Thanks: 9
Thanked 21 Times in 14 Posts
thinxrain2 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Megaadeeel View Post
I have no doubt over your intentions, dear. May be it was due to some mis communication as you pointed out. My friend works at NAB Quetta, he told me that there is no such hearing scheduled on 16th or 17th January. When I asked him about the date of hearing, he said, "I will communicate it to you later"
May be it is on 22nd January as Mr. Hassan pointed out. I will share the info as soon as I hear from my friend.
Dear Brother, Can somebody inform abt the final candidates for Assistant BPS-14?
Is there any way to know the names of the same?
Reply With Quote
  #2665  
Old Thursday, January 17, 2013
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Quetta
Posts: 72
Thanks: 8
Thanked 19 Times in 14 Posts
Megaadeeel is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinxrain2 View Post
Dear Brother, Can somebody inform abt the final candidates for Assistant BPS-14?
Is there any way to know the names of the same?
You will have to wait for the final result and that is subject to vacation of stay order.
Reply With Quote
  #2666  
Old Thursday, January 17, 2013
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 158
Thanks: 49
Thanked 57 Times in 36 Posts
star5 is on a distinguished road
Default

As per my resource, date of hearing [22.01.2013]conveyed by Hassan Naqvi is confirmed. Now pray for stay vacation on the said date.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to star5 For This Useful Post:
yms221 (Thursday, January 17, 2013)
  #2667  
Old Thursday, January 17, 2013
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Lahore
Posts: 46
Thanks: 3
Thanked 102 Times in 29 Posts
HassanNaqvi is on a distinguished road
Default The order sheet pf the "petition"

AoA all
Sorry for such a long delay in uploading it due to some personal commitments, but here it is finally.












and it seems that the date has been confirmed from another source, anyhow look for http://ihc.gov.pk/causelist.html on Saturday evening to check on the updated list of cases to be put up for the hearing. Good luck guys, fingers crossed
Regards
Hassan Naqvi
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to HassanNaqvi For This Useful Post:
benign (Friday, January 18, 2013), BiggBoss (Thursday, January 17, 2013)
  #2668  
Old Thursday, January 17, 2013
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 124
Thanks: 18
Thanked 22 Times in 17 Posts
Aslam khan Islamabad is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HassanNaqvi View Post
Dear all I apologize for spreading this information about the date of hearing I conveyed what was told to me from the IHC computer section and today the same guy called from the IHC and told me that there was some misunderstanding at their office as the case was fixed for 22.01 and not for today I just told him the number of the petition and he told me the title and other related things
All the remaining info that I have been sharing is authentic as u can see that already I had said that the only issue was of stay from current employees, now again I have shared the date of 22.01 as conveyed from IHC.

All other information was first hand and was authentic and this date info was second hand but has been corrected. But as he has already made a mistake I shall not say that this is also authentic till the list of cases has been loaded to IHC website.

In addition to the above I will try and upload the order sheet tonight
Regards
Hassan Naqvi
dear the petition copy that u hv uploaded prays against recruitment in grade 17 above then as to why JIOs are not being given offer letters??? any explanantion
Reply With Quote
  #2669  
Old Thursday, January 17, 2013
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 124
Thanks: 18
Thanked 22 Times in 17 Posts
Aslam khan Islamabad is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Attention all jio applicants

Dear all , having read the petition it has been concluded that the prayer made to the court does not challenge recruitment in grade -16 jio. But it has challenged grade 17 and above recruitment ....so what r u guys waiting for ......zaher se baat hai k jio aur above grade wale petitioners hai to to unhone to assistant director and above ko challenge kia h ........then what r u waiting for ....tamam log unity kare and kal nab ko call krke raise ur voice and agar positive response nh aata to write down to them and in the newspapers as well .... How long shall we suffer .....shout 4 ur rights.....
Reply With Quote
  #2670  
Old Friday, January 18, 2013
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Lahore
Posts: 46
Thanks: 3
Thanked 102 Times in 29 Posts
HassanNaqvi is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aslam khan Islamabad View Post
dear the petition copy that u hv uploaded prays against recruitment in grade 17 above then as to why JIOs are not being given offer letters??? any explanantion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aslam khan Islamabad View Post
Dear all , having read the petition it has been concluded that the prayer made to the court does not challenge recruitment in grade -16 jio. But it has challenged grade 17 and above recruitment ....so what r u guys waiting for ......zaher se baat hai k jio aur above grade wale petitioners hai to to unhone to assistant director and above ko challenge kia h ........then what r u waiting for ....tamam log unity kare and kal nab ko call krke raise ur voice and agar positive response nh aata to write down to them and in the newspapers as well .... How long shall we suffer .....shout 4 ur rights.....
Dear all,

My humble request to all of you, please look at everything in life with deep concentration so that you can see all the aspects of an issue and then please again take some time and decide what should be done next. Me dear friends a simple look into the order shall help you clarify many of the doubts.

The Honorable Judge Sahab Bahadur has granted a stay, copy of which I am displaying again,
http://pzy.be/v/141/71.jpg

In the C.M 2 OF 2012 IN W.P 2535/2012, The Honorable Judge Sahib Bahadur has clearly stated that no final orders against the "ADVERTISED POSTS" meaning thereby, that all the posts are under a stay, and yes it has not been prayed for in the petition but has been granted, what can one say on it, but yes, it can be vacated on arguments before the Court. So i think that makes it pretty much clear for the JIO as well as a brother above who was asking about grade 14.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to HassanNaqvi For This Useful Post:
Xeeshan Ali (Friday, January 18, 2013), yms221 (Friday, January 18, 2013)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Psychological Test and Psch: Interview Capricorn of Thar Psychological Tests 6 Monday, August 06, 2012 10:48 AM
Guidance for psychological test and interview shahrukh09 CSS 2010 Exam 1 Friday, October 15, 2010 03:57 PM
Interview and Psychological test amk CSS 2006 Exam 12 Tuesday, October 17, 2006 05:26 AM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.