Monday, April 29, 2024
05:06 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > Pakistan Intelligence Agencies Jobs > Inter Services Intelligence (ISI)

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #51  
Old Monday, March 13, 2017
jan jawad's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: In the land of dreams
Posts: 141
Thanks: 75
Thanked 34 Times in 26 Posts
jan jawad is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambber View Post
Blame game has been started again like every year,just got some cnic's and un ka post-mortem jaari hai. It looks that nts made a mistake this time by announcing the marks, they were better without announcing marks like previous years. I dnt know transparency of nts but i am very sure that nts is not that powerful yet to dodge MOD regarding their results. Person with 87 marks must be selected from some quota.
I like your way. koshish jari, may be we get something against them
__________________
Today's Present is Tomorrow's Past and Today is more beautiful than Tomorrow..
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old Monday, March 13, 2017
Murium's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 541
Thanks: 120
Thanked 342 Times in 201 Posts
Murium will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamFaisalamankhan View Post
THOSE wo qualified NTS on 87 marks etc are from minorties group ..plz check the result again
Minorities? That person is from RWP and appeared from Punjab domicile? How come 87 be the minimum merit in Punjab ?
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...type=3&theater
__________________
A man is not finished when he is defeated, he is finished when he quits!!!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Murium For This Useful Post:
Pseudo (Monday, March 13, 2017)
  #53  
Old Monday, March 13, 2017
Arsenal FC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Rawalpindi
Posts: 758
Thanks: 55
Thanked 286 Times in 206 Posts
Arsenal FC is on a distinguished road
Angry

Thousands applied for the screening test one may ask the NTS why they were not given the opportunity like last time's recruitment of competing in the descriptive test so that they would have more chance of passing.....because the fees collected of rupees 800 remained the same...... because the main aim was just to filter out the candidates because fees had been collected which remains the prime objective of this non profit organisation. Than deliberately no syllabus was disclosed and no indication was given as to what courses were to be included...then deliberately the threshold was kept sky high at 68 out of 100 or 136 out of 200 because the main aim remained the same that is to filter out maximum number of candidates... one may argue that if such process was to be adopted then at least fees must not have been collected from thousands who are appearing for screening test and the people who managed to pass the screening test and make it into the descriptive test should have been asked for fees if the objective was to remain as a non profit organisation.

Having passed in both the posts of NAB and in SBP og2 I always respected opinion of other people who couldn't make it in them and agreed that their grievances indeed needed to be addressed.

But looking at the responses of a few people here it is my humble request to the moderators to close this thread....

jinhon na clear kar liya hai WO aisa insecure act kar rahay hain jaisa un ki rug par kisi na paon rakh diya ho...
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Arsenal FC For This Useful Post:
aadil786 (Monday, March 13, 2017)
  #54  
Old Monday, March 13, 2017
wolfy's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: UAE
Posts: 45
Thanks: 19
Thanked 19 Times in 10 Posts
wolfy is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm not sure about all these scam claims. The Quota system (however silly) may explain the low marks getting shortlisted.

But, yesterday I saw a fellers MCQ result paper and he had gotten 135.45.

.45?

.45?!

How does one get 45% of a single MCQ right?
__________________
Playing an away match in Uganda.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old Monday, March 13, 2017
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 74
Thanks: 12
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
phantomkhan is on a distinguished road
Default

I failed the screening test. And even though I do not care about the subject in discussion, I do condemn the shortlisting mechanism and the high cutoff scores. Particularly, applying a global cutoff score for all provinces. I prepared for this stupid test for a long time and I think that its rather unfair to cut off scores for KP above 140, where I acquired 134. The descriptive questions were fairly easy yet I'm not qualified to attempt it. Its very painful and quite simply unfair to be honest. I'm not sure how long it'll take to cope with this failure. All my preparation gone to waste. And even if I make it next time, that'll probably be 2 years later. 2 years is a long time.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old Monday, March 13, 2017
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 16
Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
waqasrai is on a distinguished road
Default

Guys, there might be certain issues with NTS in this result and i am not defending NTS but as far as both the mentioned candidates, namely Zesshan Danish and Shafeel Riaz are concerned, both of them are Christians, both live in Rawalpindi but Zeeshan is basically from Sheikhupura, so his CNIC No. starts from different series.... i too got 134 marks and a bit hurt for not being selected for next step.... now the next question will arise that how do i know this information, so the reply is that i work in an organization where Verisys facility is available...
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to waqasrai For This Useful Post:
Faraz K Afridi (Monday, March 13, 2017), Xing Lee (Monday, March 13, 2017)
  #57  
Old Monday, March 13, 2017
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
TailChopper is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phantomkhan View Post
I prepared for this stupid test for a long time and I think that its rather unfair to cut off scores for KP above 140, where I acquired 134.
Cutoff for kpk was 135,person with 136 were allowed to sit in descriptive test
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old Monday, March 13, 2017
Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 43
Thanks: 11
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Sherlocked is on a distinguished road
Default

Is anyone registering any complain against NTS anywhere ? is there any mechanism to stop this any justice ?
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old Monday, March 13, 2017
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 74
Thanks: 12
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
phantomkhan is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TailChopper View Post
Cutoff for kpk was 135,person with 136 were allowed to sit in descriptive test
That's a shame. Was 135 the same for all the other provinces?
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old Monday, March 13, 2017
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Lahore
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
gejilani is on a distinguished road
Default

NTS is claiming that the person who got shortlisted by scoring 87 marks, belongs to minority quota.
but there was not any minority quota mentioned in advertisement for AD.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Exam results do not determine a student's worth Man Jaanbazam Dawn 4 Saturday, August 29, 2015 10:53 AM
Reduce Exam Anxiety khuhro Humorous, Inspirational and General Stuff 1 Sunday, September 19, 2010 09:36 PM
@ZIRYAN : Tehsildar Exam MOHIB BALOCH BPSC 0 Monday, September 06, 2010 02:49 PM
Ten Tips for Exam Success The Star Tips and Experience Sharing 0 Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:20 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.