#71
|
||||
|
||||
Moreover ,many pandora box will open now.
since 2013 , many people have paid to qualify tests .they have been appointed in different departments via SPSC. They can reveal secrets coz their investment is null and void now. i am sure staff is under pressure now. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
No doubt,Pakistan is on the verge of becoming a true democracy.long live Supreme Court
|
#73
|
||||
|
||||
WOW. I am really happy to know that all exams from 2013 to 2016 have been nullified.
|
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Thumbs up SC. Thanks for saving Sindh Province from the clutches of corrupt and inept SPSC and Sindh government.
|
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Merit cant be prevailed just by supreme court, common public should be aware now and for god sake BHUTTO's ko ab dafan ho jana chahye. Jub tak bhuttos zinda hain graves me bhi,merit kbi nhi prevail kr sakta.
|
#76
|
|||
|
|||
They havent taken any since 2013
|
#77
|
||||
|
||||
This is the best thing to see, as most of the people in Sindh, who dream to serve on the basis of merit, had lost their hopes... But this decision has induced a new spirit.
But one strange thing is that, what about AGE, there is some philosophy behind the age limit, that was 21 - 28 year for CCE-2013... What about that? A person-28 in 2013 is now 33.... :-) and according to limit rule#4(in Ad): A person serving in Sindh for 4 years has age limitation of 35...that guy would be now 40....It seems a mess. It is somehow contrary to age limit philosophy. Sent from my QMobile X800 using Tapatalk |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
did SC nullified all the exams conducted by SPSC or just CE 2013?
I have cleared test and interview for the post of lecturer in 2016. Will this decision make any effect on us also? |
#79
|
||||
|
||||
No, Only CCE-2013. News channels are fool, they just break the news without confirmation. They first tell that all exams. This is wrong only CCE-2013 is declared null and void.
Sent from my QMobile X800 using Tapatalk |
#80
|
||||
|
||||
what about screening test. there were lots of discrepancies in screening test as well? What about those who have worked hard day and night and clear this exam on merit?? and why did not SC give punishment to all those who were illegally appointed and ruined thousands of students career??
SC decision has raised may questions?? it is only students or lower or middle class who always suffered while elite class have always been given safe route to pass by. Sorry to say that, in this way merit will not prevail.. merit will only prevail when u give punishment to those who did corruption and injustice. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Asma Jilani ---- Vs---- Govt. of the Punjab | sajidnuml | Constitutional Law | 5 | Saturday, November 11, 2017 06:00 PM |
Mercantile Law Prepartion | letsfly | Mercantile Law | 2 | Sunday, May 11, 2014 01:13 PM |
The constitution of the islamic republic of pakistan, 1973[1] | IMTIAZ AHMAD KHAN | Constitutional Law | 0 | Thursday, February 14, 2013 05:40 PM |
Timeline: Judiciary vs executive | Call for Change | Current Affairs | 0 | Tuesday, June 19, 2012 06:14 PM |