in my opinion following points should be mentioned in the petition.
1Despite govt assurances matter is delayed till Nov so age relaxatiion must be more than 30 due to loss of 2016 css chance.
2.If special relaxation in age is given to candidates belonging to backward areas it should also be given to all aspirants because
it is competitive exam.

I dont think talking against backward areas will help the case.

It is a competetive exam but the ground is not level. FATA is a poor area with little educational access for example. Similarly many remote areas need specail attention because the government has not been able to do any developmental work there for the last 78 years.

So dont try to teach the government of what it should do.

All must ask for maximum age relation such as 32 years. All must mention how important it is to take the decision before the announcement of CSS exam 2016.

So forward your case on good grounds. If you ask the government to remove the additional relaxation for backward areas, it will open a pandora box and the case will collapse all together. Try to achieve ONE thing with a united step and that is : All must fight for increased age limit.

I have sent public petition through the website. All should do the same.
We must ask for 32 years relaxation for general cadre and it must be announced for CSS 2016 as many aspirants have their last chance for CE in 2016.

yes you r right.would u share the draft of petition?

please go throw this

Public Petition regarding non-installation of Machine Readable Passport System in
the Embassy of Pakistan, Manila, for Pakistani community residing in Philippines.
Mr. Chairman: We now take up Item No. 7 regarding discussion on the
following matter raised through a Public Petition:-
“Non-installation of Machine Readable Passport System in the
Embassy of Pakistan, Manila, for Pakistani community residing in
Philippines”.
Before I ask any member to speak, Raja sahib, is there a Minister to respond
to this?
ا سب!ا نهےکتن
ص
س
خ
ش briefم سخد ےہ؟
امر : سجسی
ص
سمائ
لھ
تنر
ی
گکلممستان
ست
ص
سهامحبمر
صگ
ا ف
ص
س
خ
ش Interior ےہامر
گ گ
ےسعتم brief سم تن م سخد ےہ۔
Mr. Chairman: Who would like to speak on this public petition? There is no
member to speak. Minister sahib, can you make a statement on this?
public petitionسی
ےمہ س
under the amended rules receive
ص
نپ
ےہ،ا نها نتا
ی
statementدسی۔ ےہئ
ےہعمہلم ےہامراےس
ا
!سی سبگ
سیمص
ی
سهنچ س
ص
سج
سهامح:
صگ
ا ف
ص
س
خ
ش resolve سمےساسی
ص
ےک سئلسکیت
ص
team for the رن
سنساتسرہےس opening of this office, Manila
گ
گ
ت
گامرا یکلگگ
ی
ں سیملمکم ےہ سحن
ص
رہدت
ص
سنسانب
گ
گ
ےہ۔سیامت
س سحری ے
ح
سھھس
ھ
ا
ص
ےہ۔ا نتاں
ص
الےکدر سمں

ارد
ص
ےہ
رہ
ص
نب internal process almost completion
ص
ںن
ص
سیم ےہامران
ہی س target دتس
م ر
خ
امس
ص
سمےسمہےںانب
ص
ےہ ہسی دسیےگ۔ سکیت
؟
س ےہکسگ
ص
ا ےہ،سیا ےسنلہپہن

نت
گ
گ
مق
سبگ
اھت س
گ
سم سیمت
ص
سکیت
ستا سب!
ص
:مر
سیمص
ی
سهنچ س
ص
سج
ص
انب
ص
ہک ےہ ہ ےہن
سھجمہی س
ص
ںن
ص
سهمال!ان
ص
سج
سهامح:
صگ
ا ف
ص
س
خ
ش process د ےہ۔
ص
س
رن
گ
ت
ص
ںن
ص
سمیکان
ص
سکیت
ےہامر
ص
اھت س لمکمرت
سی
ص
Ministry of Interior نخکن سھجم subject اا
ص
ںن
ص
ان
گ
سم ےہت briefing یک
ص
سکیت
ص
یہک ےہ ہ ےہن
گ
سیمسیتسه
target
dateد ےہ۔
33
Mr. Chairman: The petition stands disposed of. The Senate Secretariat may
inform the petitioners that the Minister has made a categorical statement on the
floor of the House that work will commence on the said office from the 1st
November, 2015. Nauman Wazir sahib.
! سی
سیمص
ی
سهنچ س
ص
سج
:

ستخ ص
ص
مر
ص
ماں
ع
ص
ن
ر

ہسی
ص
سہٹ
ص
ےہ۔ firefighting ے ری We identify a place by public ےہ
ےس petition very well, Government response ص
اں ےہ۔
گ
ا The Government should ِدھ ےہ سحت
come up and say that readable passport machines ص
ےہ missions سیم اں
it ،رسیےگinstall
ں generalize policy نت اshould not be that this is a complaint, سج سجں ر
نح ےسہ ہہ ے
ص
ےہئ
missions نح
ص
ےی س ،مہےںسی ےہئ
م سخد
کاسی س
گ
سیم ےسہ۔ا سئلکحم policy
ص
ں
گ
نح ےسہامرتنسک
ص
د firefighting سک سپ
گ
ص
اہلسلسخ
ی
سی۔ and as a policy, as institutionسحن
خ
سں۔ش
چنلٹ
ا سب۔
ےہ سسحص
:سمخ
سیمص
ی
سهنچ س
ص
سج
سش:
ےہ سسحص
رسمخ

ہسی
ص
ص سیم سہٹ
!
سیمص
ی
سهنچ س
ص
ےہں۔ briefly two points سج
گ
نح ےہ
ص
رت
گ
نتتسه
Manila is very important because Asian Development Bank is there and a lot of
Pakistanis are working there. It is a hub in South East Asia.
سک ےہ ہ
س
ص
صیف
ص
ممکلن
ی
یک ےہ ہا سهئک
ھت س
ص
ستا سبن
ص
مر
ص
ماں
ع
ص
ن
گ
!دمس تسه
سیمص
ی
سهنچ س
ص
سج from 1st January
مںےکتن 2016 onwards
خص
ممکلےکتسش
سجص machine readable passports س
ص
س ےہںےگ،اہن
ص
ھت
س
ہن entry
س deny
ص
ےہیگامراہن visa س machine readable ئلس ااbecause of security reasons.ےہگ denyھت
passportیک اایس uniform policy نح ےسہ
ص
ےہئ and that should be applicable to all Pakistani
passport holders irrespective of the country they are located in.
Mr. Chairman, finally, I would like to commend you that
34
ا نهcitizensیک public petitions ،
ی
سیملن
ص
I think this is the first time in the history of کاستاں
the Senate and the credit goes to you. ص
ہاستاں
ص
ی
ب
ص
ےکغامات
ص
ں
گ
ےہ،سیتنسک
س
ص
ےک سئلہن
ص
رر

ہسی
ص
سہٹ
صفص
ص
سیاستاں
I am glad that you represented the citizens very well.ےہ۔
ب سحر ۔۔۔۔۔۔
T10-08July15 Ashraf/Ed. 0230
Mr. Chairman: Thank you, Mushahid sahib, but the credit for this entire
effort goes to the whole House and particularly to the House Business Committee
which has given approval of it. This is the second time, before this we had a
discussion on the CSS Exam issue and we got an assurance from the government
on that and now we again have an assurance from the government that work will
commence from the 1st of November, 2015. The petitioners be informed
accordingly by the Senate Secretariat.
I would also take this opportunity to inform the House that
نچک
ےی س
گ
سخ سم الطعه petitions
Standing Committeesسخ
کو refer
ےی س مہےںنتھت س
ی
ےہئ
issues resolve
ی
ےہن
ےہ
گ
سیما ئ
سئ

سیست
مہرنتره
ےہ۔ سسیجی ے
سیما ری ے
ی
ہےم
ھت س
یکرنتره
ص
ےی س امراں
that will be placed in the House.
But, even the Committees have made progress in that regard. Yes, we now move
on to Agenda Item No.8. Agenda Item No.8 is a Calling Attention Notice. The
Calling Attention Notice is in the name of Agha Shahbaz Khan Durrani sahib. Please
raise the issue.

Yeh kia thaa ???


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sorry guys my previous post went horribly wrong. Actually I wanted to convey to all of you that the date Nov 1st mentioned on this forum does not relate to CSS age relaxation but another public petition relating to some electronic visa issues etc,.For reference go throw the Senate Debate of 8th july, a portion of which is quoted on this forum.But if you read the page preceding it, things will get crystal clear.

Regards

Moreover I called Mr Agha Shahbaz Durrani who is chairman committee for Government Assurances.According to him, in the committee meeting of 8th july the Minister Aftab Shaikh who earlier gave assurance to the Senate regarding CSS age limit took a different stance in meeting.He said "Ma ne assurance nhee di thee, ye kaha tha k iss ma koe mazaiqa nhee" ( sorry for netspeak ).

Agha Sb also told me that committee has referred the matter back to Chairman Senate and that the petition has not been disposed off yet.

Regards

Brother could you please elaborate what is the legal significance of a matter being disposed of in Senate? Also regarding your conversation with the said official, what in your view is the possibility of our matter being addressed till September?
Thanks.

Avoid net speak. It is against Forum Rules. Use "you" instead of "u".

__________________
The world is changed by your example, not by your opinion !

All aspirants should submit public petitions through the senate website so that the matter may again be highlighted and seriousness of the aspirants may be conveyed to the authorities. Whatever they want to do, it should be before the commencement of CSS-2016 so that those who have their last chance may be free from any doubt and concern in making their decisions.