|
Share Thread: Facebook Twitter Google+ |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Let's solve papers
Q2. "Conquest of sind produced everlasting results not only in sindh but also in al over the South asia" discuss
What did you discussed in this question. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
i have a question that is there no concept of choice in css exam? All the questions asked are to be answered?
__________________
Wheat is Brilliant Gold |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
There is choice. In Q.paper total 8 Questions are asked. Q.No:1 is MCQ and compulsory, from rest of the 7 Questions candidate is required to attempt 4 question as per choice. Total questions attempted must not exceed 5 including compulsory Question containing MCQs.
__________________
Your attitude, not your aptitude, will determine your altitude...Zig Ziglar |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ali Mallah For This Useful Post: | ||
Farah Rasheed (Tuesday, March 12, 2013), KamiWazir (Sunday, November 18, 2012) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Answer to the q asked by sarfaraz shami
it includes when
1. Arabs tried to conquer the Subcontinent. 2. Hijaj bin yousaf decision to send his nephew Muhammad bin Qassim to sindh to punish the pirates and Raja Dahir and free the hostages. 3 .Establishment of the muslim govt and their attitudes towards the non muslim community. 4. arrival of dynasties and mughal empires and their attitudes towards public 5. contribution of saints in the society. 6. arrival of english , europeans, and pakistan movement ultimately pakistan. this can be discuss in the paper.
__________________
follow your heart :) |
The Following User Says Thank You to maryam masood For This Useful Post: | ||
sarfaraz shami (Monday, November 05, 2012) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I went about answering this question in the following way: First, I highlighted that there are two schools of thought with regard to this question about the impact of arab conquest of Sindh. One section, led by lane poole, believes that it was only an episode, a triumph without result. However, there is another section of historians which believes in the huge magnitude of the impact that the conquest left on Sindh nay SouthAsia, as underscored in the question itself. Having described this, i went on to discuss the extent to which the above proposition holds truth. My conclusion was that truth ,as always, lies somewhere in the middle. It would be unfair to dismiss the Arab conquest of Sindh as inconsequential. It yielded a number of social, cultural,economic and intellectual results. Nevertheless, it would be equally misleading to exaggerate its importance. The real Muslim conquerors of India and hence South Asia came from central Asia and not Arab lands. Moreover, the actual conquest of India happened via khyber pass and not Sindh.
__________________
Why not !? |
The Following User Says Thank You to out of place For This Useful Post: | ||
KamiWazir (Sunday, November 18, 2012) |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
> sada e pakistan secret newspaper published fom.... Punjab NWFP Sindh None of these |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Middle east: Strategic impact of united states defence strategic review 2012 | Shooting Star | Current Affairs | 0 | Sunday, February 05, 2012 04:09 PM |
Past present: Do we have a history? | AFRMS | News & Articles | 0 | Sunday, October 25, 2009 07:16 PM |
Albert Einstein | ahsanghalib | General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests | 0 | Saturday, December 16, 2006 06:58 PM |