In favour of sit in
First of all I would like to say that its not the feather in PML (N)'s cap that they did immense achievements in economy as well as in dealing with the internal crises because we haven't made tremendous achievements. In the start of Nawaz Sharif's regime the value of Pakistani rupee comparing to US dollar was Rs. 98.4 which rose to Rs. 107.2 in December 2013 and now its value is Rs. 102.8. The average devaluing at the rate of Rs. 4.4 per annum which is shameful figure, not the achievement. On the other side they showed the bubble economy to grow annual GDP growth rate from 3.59% in 2013 to 4.1% now which is also not a big achievement because annual GDP growth rate is at fluctuating rate in developing countries like in Pakistan.
If you say that PML (N) started many development projects then its also wrong because they have just created hurdles in projects like Diamer Bhasha, which will generate 4500 MW electricity, was scheduled to complete its construction in 2020 but now current government has imposed ban for further 17 years and this project will complete in 2037. Another example is that after wasting huge amount of public for local government elections they haven't conducted proper local government elections. These are only two examples, there are also many other examples like these.
Now come to the point, you cannot construct the building on the bas of sand. If someone win the elections with rigging and do extraordinary works then you cannot appreciate him. If a bandit starts proper business with the capital earned from robbery then we cannot call him a proper fair mean person because the base of business is wrong. The same situation is with current PML (N) government. Now every political party has accepted on different occasions that result of current elections was based on rigging. Some say that rigging was on big scale and some say that it was on small scale. When MQM, PML (N), PML (Q), PPP, PTI and even every political party has accepted that rigging happened then why not mid term elections should be conducted? It doesn't mean that only those who are participating in PTI sit in are against current government, majority of PTI followers are not participating in Islamabad sit in but are busy in their routine work but their vote is for PTI. Thus majority is against current government, the proof is that wherever Nawaz Sharif or Shehbaz Sharif go for speech then they have to face exclamations against them.
If you ask that why Imran Khan didn't raise voice against rigging in start then I would like to tell that he is saying about PML (N)'s rigging from start and he is not much experienced politician as compared to Nawaz Sharif so it took much time (as he said on TV interview on his birthday) to understand the technicalities of rigging that how PML (N) used unfair means.
As you are saying that he is doing sheer circus in Islamabad which he should not do, then I think it is wrong because when if no one listen his stance then he should do such like that. What our courts are doing? What they did against Raja Pervaiz Ashraf for rental power projects? What they did against Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani against his NAB cases? What our courts did for Gulu Batt case? In this situation he is doing absolutely right whatever he is doing.
You blamed that Imran Khan is hostaging women and children, which is wrong because whoever come in his sit in he/she comes as his/her will, he doesn't make hostage to anyone. Whoever comes for sit in, he comes for a change because we are fed up from this system. In September 2013 the per unit price of electricity for domestic consumers was Rs. 8.11 and current price is Rs. 18 per unit. These women are our mothers and sisters and belong to our beloved country, they are not foreigners about whom you use such words. Women has equal right to participate in politics and sit in.
|