Quote:
Originally Posted by MrNobody
This has totally exhausted me, honestly. I know candidates who took the test just for fun and got between 45to50. Enabling such kind of candidates to appear in the written will have a heavy toll on us, wasting our precious time. There were weaknesses in the test pattern and so are in the newly introduced policy of 25csnd/seat, I agree. But it does not exactly mean that the whole test was crap. Except for the currencies and capitals related questions, there were nothing in the test which were not part of any screening/recruitment test This is very unfair on the part of the failed candidates to portray the content of the test as something which shouldn't be the part of the test.
|
Someone should tell this stunted growth individual chairing the establishment committee that the pattern and content of the screening test was not something unusual which has not been part of any standard recruitment test. The committee members seems to have blindly believed--which politicians usually do, given their mediocrity--the 'aggrieved' candidates. Having worked in the government sector for a brief period, I can tell from my personal experience that politicians don't do what is right; they do what serves their vested interests and is told by their constituents. To protect their vote bank, they always stand by their constituents, no matter how much the latter is illogical and wrong, and how much their demand is illegal. The subject issue is being handled by politicians exactly the way they run their constituencies: they give the constituents undue favours and in return, they bag votes. And this approach of not letting the institutions work on the part of our political class has ruined our state institutions. Unfortunately, we're at the receiving end.
Bottom line is, one should not expect any good from them. May Allah SWT grant us patience!
Sunday, August 22, 2021
Similar Threads
