Criteria for Senior Member to be revisited

Daud DD · #1 Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Dears all..

I have one question that I wanted to discuss on the forum..

and that is Should we not revisit forums criterai for making some one as senior and others junior???????

When I observed I found that anyone who makes more posts is senior--no matter these are jokes, fun stuff or anything else--happens to be senior than others...
I think posts should not be made the sole criteria for making some senior.....Many other things could be incorporated there in..i.e the utality of stuff the activeness of that person in responding to queries etc..

Hope you people will agree with my contention.

Surmount · #2 Tuesday, June 16, 2009

@ Daud DD

The changing of title from Junior to Senior member is totally automatic one. As soon as a person posts his/her 101st post, s/he gets a title as senior member. The value/worth of the postings of the members is not from the title but it can be seen by the Awards. You can see many members who has a few posts but those are worthy ones e.g Raz, Shah Baz, S.H. Virk. Because they differ. They have made valuable posts for the aspirants so they are appreciated by the Team as form of badge/Medal of appreciation.

One can also get such medals even being a junior member. I hope you got answer.

Shaa-Baaz · #3 Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Reputation marks are also helpful in differentiating valuable members from others.

Like last island with the most reputation marks ever.
Surmount got 2 blocks as well.

Artemis · #4 Wednesday, June 17, 2009

I have another suggestion.. Lets rename this thread to," tareef ka jawab tareef se daien."

That was a suggestion but it turned into members' promotion.

Last Island · #5 Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by ms.bushra

I have another suggestion.. Lets rename this thread to," tareef ka jawab tareef se daien."

That was a suggestion but it turned into members' promotion.

That wasnt tareef or promotion actually. They are explaining through examples.

Members are always welcome to give suggestions but they are not allowed to reply in feedback corner on behalf of management i.e. Admins, mods and SMs.

Artemis · #6 Wednesday, June 17, 2009

@Last Island
That was a mere joke.. .. I am at a lil bit frank terms with those on whom I was commenting..
I am sorry if it sounded ironic to you.

Daud DD · #7 Thursday, June 18, 2009

Dear surmount I visted the posts of the person that you mentioned in your reply to me........but sorry to say yar.......in every instance the MAJORITY of posts posted by them pertained to areas not pertaining to CSS at all........but I have no issue with it.......one must get some entertainment toooo besides doing studies....

You mentioned about awards----well that is a gooood point which I appreciate.....but Than I will request the WORTHY ADMINS of this site to please remove the word senior or Junior member from the profile or it MUST only be linked with the awards won by the member (regardless of number of postsi.e 100+ etc.........and all others should simply be called as MEMBERS........

Regards

Lord AvaLon · #8 Thursday, June 18, 2009

Daud DD:

Thank you for your suggestion but apparently there is no harm in changing the status of a member from junior to senior after a particular number of posts. If the management consider the contribution Worthwhile they award those members with medals. Hence its not the number of posts which makes the difference but invaluable contribution that proves to be of immense help to the aspirants.

Regards,

Xeric · #9 Thursday, June 18, 2009

@DDD

I think it is not a big deal whether someone is Senior or Junior Member. We should contribute for the aspirants and help them in our own capacity regardless of any medals or status. Our cause should be to get benefit for our future and help others.

Junior or Senior – it is natural phenomena. In age, status and position, there is always difference. A junior officer can’t claim to be treated as equal to the senior. I think your plan is not feasible. You could post the useful material for members instead of wasting your energy and time in site feedback over a useless issue.

@Mss Bushra

Light moments in feedback corner are constructive.

Surmount · #10 Thursday, June 18, 2009

@ DD

Halao there. When I read your post in which you said that you don't think that the members mentioned by me are having posting pertaining to CSS, I read again my post and checked the postings of the appreciated members, as I know I can be wrong but hence I could see their worthy postings easily as they are visible. I thought to mention each and every post of them, but I thought its really, actually useless and wastage of time and energy..... Because criticism can search any other point to be placed. So, from my side *Case is closed*.

@ Team

One of My Ravian teacher said, "Don't feel ownselves greater until some one speaks against you, no matters in form of light jokes".

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Pakistan's India policy revisited	shakeel shaikh	News & Articles	0	Wednesday, July 22, 2009 01:54 PM
Physical criteria for A.S.P	Nazik	Frequently Asked Questions	3	Sunday, June 03, 2007 09:03 PM
Naval battles revisited	Khyber	Discussion	1	Sunday, January 07, 2007 08:07 PM
Report of Technical Commitee on Water Resources	Yasir Hayat Khan	General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests	0	Monday, January 16, 2006 02:53 AM
Technical Report on water resources	A Soul	Pakistan Affairs	2	Wednesday, December 28, 2005 10:45 PM

The Following User Says Thank You to Daud DD For This Useful Post:
Artemis (Wednesday, June 17, 2009)

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Surmount For This Useful Post:
Raz (Tuesday, June 16, 2009), Shaa-Baaz (Tuesday, June 16, 2009)

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Shaa-Baaz For This Useful Post:
Raz (Tuesday, June 16, 2009), Surmount (Tuesday, June 16, 2009)

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Last Island For This Useful Post:
Shaa-Baaz (Wednesday, June 17, 2009), Surmount (Wednesday, June 17, 2009)

The Following User Says Thank You to Lord AvaLon For This Useful Post:
Surmount (Thursday, June 18, 2009)

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Xeric For This Useful Post:
Artemis (Thursday, June 18, 2009), Surmount (Thursday, June 18, 2009)