CSS Forums
Monday, April 29, 2024
05:13 PM (GMT +5)
05:13 PM (GMT +5)
|
#641
Sunday, January 17, 2016
|
||||
|
||||
congratulations to all qualified candidates.
Wishes for those who could not make this time; success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm. :-)
__________________
Or do you think that the Fellows of the Cave and the Inscription were of Our Signs wonderful? |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mustansar~hussain For This Useful Post: | ||
Divergent (Monday, January 18, 2016), Farah Rasheed (Tuesday, January 19, 2016) | ||
|
#642
Sunday, January 17, 2016
|
|||
|
|||
|
Apart from all that, I would request NTS to atleast show the marks to all candidates who appeared in the test, after all how could someone know his mistakes if his performance isn't shown to him....
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Engrelt For This Useful Post: | ||
sincere khan (Sunday, January 17, 2016) | ||
|
#643
Sunday, January 17, 2016
|
||||
|
||||
|
;D Yaar all these testing agencies are transparent.
But their level is very bad, in my opinion. Their question papers are filled with mistakes of all sorts; grammatical or simply outright wrong options (MCQs) in some cases. Be it FPSC or NTS. As long as you do the rutta proper, you're probably going to pass. Regardless, congrats to all those who passed. Good luck onwards!
__________________
D: |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Mrkhansaab For This Useful Post: | ||
Divergent (Monday, January 18, 2016) | ||
|
#644
Sunday, January 17, 2016
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#645
Sunday, January 17, 2016
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have always found the content of PPSC and FPSC far better than NTS'. Blunders in NTS questions are far more conspicuous than they are in questions appearing on PPSC and FPSC exams.
Those who couldn't qualify, please know that getting through substandard tests is usually not a reflection of your potential. If anything, it divulges that you were not as lucky as most of the candidates who qualified. Had I attempted this Current Affairs paper in CSS, I would have been awarded a maximum of six marks. And I feel sorry for all the people out there who worked hard, gave a brilliant attempt and yet flunked. I owe an apology to all of you on behalf of slackers like me who did not deserve it one bit. I hope God has something far better for you out there. |
|
#646
Sunday, January 17, 2016
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Everything you can imagine is real. |
|
#647
Sunday, January 17, 2016
|
||||
|
||||
|
Summary
Although I want to stay out of controversies and such futile debates, but I couldn't stop myself from writing on the issue. Now that a few reverend candidates have mentioned how genius they are and how mediocre the passed ones are, and how confident they were and how lucky others were. I want to make these points:
1. Since the burning issue nowadays in this thread and other threads is that a large number of confident candidates fail, and then all the bribe, nepotism and cronyism come into play, I would like to give an example here. After MCQ paper of MOD test, when I came out I met a guy that I didn't know. When I asked him about the paper, he said it was tough. Then I asked him about mathematics. He said, "Math to yar 100% tek hua." So I asked him, there was a question, A is twice as old as B is, if, after 3 years the age of B is 9, how old is A? Without giving it a second thought, he said 18. I'm not saying he didn't know the answer, that's common sense but he made the choice in a hurry. That's what usually happens. 2. Regardless of the integrity of the NTS, equal opportunity was provided to all the candidates. If a question was repeated and a candidate already had heard about it, this simply means he had done his homework while others didn't. 3. All of us knew it was NTS which was conducting the test and so many already knew that NTS is a waste of time, then why did they even take the exam? 4. Neither FPSC nor NTS is an ideal recruiting institution. We appear in these tests because we need jobs, or because we need jobs better than our current jobs. 5. No more non-serious debates please. NTS is rubbish FPSC is sluggish, but a hot debate about it here won't change anything. This thread is becoming like a newspaper agony column. |
| The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Saamboy For This Useful Post: | ||
Adele (Monday, January 18, 2016), akhtarqaisrani (Sunday, January 17, 2016), Divergent (Monday, January 18, 2016), DrWW (Monday, January 18, 2016), faheem khattak 111 (Sunday, January 17, 2016), maqsood1981 (Monday, January 18, 2016), mysterious me (Sunday, January 17, 2016), Sabir Basheer (Sunday, January 17, 2016), Z Ali S (Sunday, January 17, 2016) | ||
|
#648
Sunday, January 17, 2016
|
|||
|
|||
|
You've failed the test. This is what I've seen on my mobile screen after entering my roll number. I would be pleased if NTS upload the result of both objective and subjective part and essay as well. It's indeed not bearable as i attempted the test very well. I will not blame NTS for all. I'm a bit unlucky regarding MOD else I would have declared as pass/selected candidate for next phase. Anyways, congratulations to all selected candidates. Prayers and best wishes for all candidates for the next phase.
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Impulsive Motivator For This Useful Post: | ||
Qazi imran khan (Sunday, January 31, 2016), sincere khan (Sunday, January 17, 2016) | ||
|
#649
Sunday, January 17, 2016
|
||||
|
||||
|
this time Nts has shortlisted everyone except me. congratulation to everyone
__________________
Success is simple. Do what's right, the right way, at the right time. |
|
#650
Monday, January 18, 2016
|
||||
|
||||
|
Qualified.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Monk For This Useful Post: | ||
faheem khattak 111 (Monday, January 18, 2016) | ||
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Jobs in NAB | stuck00123 | National Accountability Bureau (NAB) | 1854 | Wednesday, May 19, 2021 10:11 AM |
| NAB Result Announced: Please Share Your Marks | sarfaraz shami | National Accountability Bureau (NAB) | 240 | Saturday, August 15, 2015 12:07 PM |
| Interview List of candidates selected against AD (KPK) Posts | Hussain_qureshi | National Accountability Bureau (NAB) | 1 | Saturday, June 06, 2015 04:30 PM |
| The constitution of the islamic republic of pakistan, 1973[1] | IMTIAZ AHMAD KHAN | Constitutional Law | 0 | Thursday, February 14, 2013 05:40 PM |
| indo-pak relations | atifch | Current Affairs | 0 | Monday, December 11, 2006 09:01 PM |
