Friday, April 26, 2024
05:07 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > Sindh Public Service Commission > SPSC Other Examinations

SPSC Other Examinations Sindh Public Service Commission

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #41  
Old Tuesday, February 28, 2017
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: karaachi
Posts: 143
Thanks: 64
Thanked 159 Times in 90 Posts
Lunatic bird is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Miraj Awaan View Post
Lunatic bird, what do you say about the matter?
Being allocated and having received offer letter,I would certainly pray and wish that court should vacate the stay from our joining process .
We have worked very hard for this exam.if there are some irregularities ,inquiry must be conducted into the matter and the culprits should be caught and punished.
Well these are my humble aspirations ,court can smash them away,I know.keeping in view remarks of one of judges in previous hearings, possibility of reinterviews can't be ignored.
Reinterviews can be a historic precedent paving the legal way for css,pms aspirants to get interviews re-conducted through court if they are not satisfied with their final results.
I'll be content with whatever judgment court passes.
__________________
"Believe you can and you're halfway there"
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old Wednesday, March 01, 2017
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 81
Thanks: 20
Thanked 15 Times in 11 Posts
peaceful loin is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lunatic bird View Post
Being allocated and having received offer letter,I would certainly pray and wish that court should vacate the stay from our joining process .
We have worked very hard for this exam.if there are some irregularities ,inquiry must be conducted into the matter and the culprits should be caught and punished.
Well these are my humble aspirations ,court can smash them away,I know.keeping in view remarks of one of judges in previous hearings, possibility of reinterviews can't be ignored.
Reinterviews can be a historic precedent paving the legal way for css,pms aspirants to get interviews re-conducted through court if they are not satisfied with their final results.
I'll be content with whatever judgment court passes.

I appreciate your views. Your hard work and efforts will not go waste. Hope something good will come out of it.
However, the irregularities have been done by Sindh Government first, then comes the SPSC and its members and others.
There is no denying the fact that the standard of interviews taken by the commission was very poor nay it was of the lowest standard. There happened many irregularities therefore the victimized candidates knocked at the door of Court.
Moreover, the commission was itself ineligible, so how it can recommend the eligible ones for the esteemed posts..? However, it's none of candidates' fault, but this is true.
Secondly, where is final merit list as it was a combined competitive exams..? The castes of the candidates were hid, how were the candidates allocated as there was no final merit list..? These were the grave issues that perplexed the victimized candidates ( Interview failures and unallocated).
Thanks to Court, atleast we have hope to get justice from there, however sometimes, sacrifice is also given by the nice persons (as you allocated on merit) for the sake of major welfare at large.
Stay blessed bro.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old Wednesday, March 01, 2017
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: karaachi
Posts: 143
Thanks: 64
Thanked 159 Times in 90 Posts
Lunatic bird is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peaceful loin View Post
I appreciate your views. Your hard work and efforts will not go waste. Hope something good will come out of it.
However, the irregularities have been done by Sindh Government first, then comes the SPSC and its members and others.
There is no denying the fact that the standard of interviews taken by the commission was very poor nay it was of the lowest standard. There happened many irregularities therefore the victimized candidates knocked at the door of Court.
Moreover, the commission was itself ineligible, so how it can recommend the eligible ones for the esteemed posts..? However, it's none of candidates' fault, but this is true.
Secondly, where is final merit list as it was a combined competitive exams..? The castes of the candidates were hid, how were the candidates allocated as there was no final merit list..? These were the grave issues that perplexed the victimized candidates ( Interview failures and unallocated).
Thanks to Court, atleast we have hope to get justice from there, however sometimes, sacrifice is also given by the nice persons (as you allocated on merit) for the sake of major welfare at large.
Stay blessed bro.
Well I second u on the matter of final merit list.while the issue of caste is not of much importance because most of the written qualified candidates who were relatives of members and other big guns have failed interview.
Secondly,if the chairman and members were ineligible ,it is the fault of government and SNGD.why should the candidates be punished?Okay,if their ineligibility can turn down 227 allocattees of cce 13 then what should be done with other 2000 recommendations which were made by the same ineligible commission?
Lastly,the most frightening thing to me is not re-conduct of interviews but that reinterviews would waste another year of candidates and what's the guarantee that new body will not do malpractices?
I would be very happy if court assigns the task of interviews to FPSC with stipulated time of 2 to 3 months.that would not only save our time,but the merit will survive also.
__________________
"Believe you can and you're halfway there"
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lunatic bird For This Useful Post:
peaceful loin (Wednesday, March 01, 2017)
  #44  
Old Wednesday, March 01, 2017
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 81
Thanks: 20
Thanked 15 Times in 11 Posts
peaceful loin is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lunatic bird View Post
Well I second u on the matter of final merit list.while the issue of caste is not of much importance because most of the written qualified candidates who were relatives of members and other big guns have failed interview.
Secondly,if the chairman and members were ineligible ,it is the fault of government and SNGD.why should the candidates be punished?Okay,if their ineligibility can turn down 227 allocattees of cce 13 then what should be done with other 2000 recommendations which were made by the same ineligible commission?
Lastly,the most frightening thing to me is not re-conduct of interviews but that reinterviews would waste another year of candidates and what's the guarantee that new body will not do malpractices?
I would be very happy if court assigns the task of interviews to FPSC with stipulated time of 2 to 3 months.that would not only save our time,but the merit will survive also.
Dear brother, absolutely there is no fault of candidates as I had already mentioned it in previous post. However, the standard of interview was of not lowest order..? Chairman Saleem, Bhatti, Bukhari and lady Narejo were their way of interviewing had some level. With quite ill-intentions they did so to discourage and dis-heart the competent candidates in order to occupy their blue-eyed ones. What a mockery of merit that a candidate gets 600+ marks in written and he is given just 68 marks in interview. There are many cases likewise.
I thank you for favoring my point on non-availability of final merit list which is base/foundation of allocations. So, my dear brother, such things can't be ignored to ensure transparency and meritocracy. This is first time that Court has come forward to rescue the sinking ship of merit by SPSC.
However, rest assured whatever the decision be, there will be balanced relief by the Honorable SC. Moreover, the new committee will not play with the candidates as the last committee did. The new committee will get interviews in such standard that will really reflects as the candidates have really appeared for the interview of CCE.
Stay blessed.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old Wednesday, March 01, 2017
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 30
Thanks: 58
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Miraj Awaan is on a distinguished road
Default

Justice should prevail for victims of nepotism as well for those successful candidates who have employed their efforts and time, and are selected on merit. The whole cce process has taken more than 3 years and the candidates are still in no where. If successful ones are declared ineligible simply because the commission was not eligible to conduct the interviews, it would be unjust, especially, for those who trusted the government of Sindh and worked hard to get the job. Big loss for candidates, but huge for Sindh government.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old Wednesday, March 01, 2017
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: karaachi
Posts: 143
Thanks: 64
Thanked 159 Times in 90 Posts
Lunatic bird is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peaceful loin View Post
Dear brother, absolutely there is no fault of candidates as I had already mentioned it in previous post. However, the standard of interview was of not lowest order..? Chairman Saleem, Bhatti, Bukhari and lady Narejo were their way of interviewing had some level. With quite ill-intentions they did so to discourage and dis-heart the competent candidates in order to occupy their blue-eyed ones. What a mockery of merit that a candidate gets 600+ marks in written and he is given just 68 marks in interview. There are many cases likewise.
I thank you for favoring my point on non-availability of final merit list which is base/foundation of allocations. So, my dear brother, such things can't be ignored to ensure transparency and meritocracy. This is first time that Court has come forward to rescue the sinking ship of merit by SPSC.
However, rest assured whatever the decision be, there will be balanced relief by the Honorable SC. Moreover, the new committee will not play with the candidates as the last committee did. The new committee will get interviews in such standard that will really reflects as the candidates have really appeared for the interview of CCE.
Stay blessed.
Yes standard of interviews was not of the level of combine competitive exam,but it was same for all.All of the candidates faced the same situation.I was taunted and laughed at twice or thrice by panel.when I answered most of the questions asked by chairman, bukhari and madam Narejo ,Bhatti started asking me questions from Urdu literature which was neither my optional nor I chose it in compulsory.They made my fun to test my nerves,I controlled my nerves and remained composed through out the interview.This is the story of almost every interviewee.
Of course,I feel sorry for those 15 to 20 friends whose scores are outstanding but they couldn't make their place in final allocations but this also a fact that more than 200 people with good scores have been successful.this happens even in css and PMS.
Another interesting thing,sindh govt is not helping cce 13 designates in this case.Instead,A.G sindh has spoiled our case from the very first day.Had the govt got their people allocated in these 227 ,it would have tried its level best to defend us in court.In last hearing,a counsel presented a list of 45 written qualified candidates who were relatives of politicians,members,high officials but couldn't make their place in final list.
One of the reasons of govt's such attitude towards us is the fact that its people are not among us.
Brother,most of the allocated candidates will happily go for reinterviews but again there is no certainity that new body will ensure merit.I believe,most of these 227 candidates belong to middle class families who spent years preparing for competitive exams.Many have resigned from their previous services after receiving offer orders for the posts allocated through cce 13, in case of reinterviews how can they be compensated?
I appreciate SC's efforts to set SPSC things on right path.At least, better things can be expected from SPSc from now onwards. On the matter of CCE 13,court should order something which may ensure merit and save time of aspirants.
Final judgment is expected in next week.
__________________
"Believe you can and you're halfway there"
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lunatic bird For This Useful Post:
Greenboat (Wednesday, March 01, 2017), sarang ali shaikh (Wednesday, March 01, 2017)
  #47  
Old Wednesday, March 01, 2017
Raja Bahar's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Larkana
Posts: 483
Thanks: 5
Thanked 286 Times in 180 Posts
Raja Bahar will become famous soon enough
Default

My selfish friends you look so smart for your own personal interest. Your comments suggest that everything was fair in SPSC for the last three or more years except CCE-2013/Viva Voce.
Oh men be realistic and adopt collective approach for God's sake. The whole process was manipulated since since the day one from Bhanwar and his company of culprits.
__________________
Those who wait they get. (Own Creation)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Raja Bahar For This Useful Post:
Greenboat (Thursday, March 02, 2017)
  #48  
Old Wednesday, March 01, 2017
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: karaachi
Posts: 143
Thanks: 64
Thanked 159 Times in 90 Posts
Lunatic bird is on a distinguished road
Default

[QUOTE=Raja Bahar;1007448]My selfish friends you look so smart for your own personal interest. Your comments suggest that everything was fair in SPSC for the last three or more years except CCE-2013/Viva Voce.
Oh men be realistic and adopt collective approach for God's sake. The whole process was manipulated since since the day one from Bhanwar and his company of culprits.[/QUOT
So the thousands of appointments should be cancelled !
This gentleman is calling us 'selfish' but actually the selfishness inside him is greater than that of us.Cce 13 should be declared null and void because he flunked it either in screening or in written.Thatswhy,all the hardwork of other candidates should go to dogs.brother,had u made it to interviews u would have supported reintrviews .
Yes we are selfish to save our careers.We are selfish to defend our jobs which we have got after striving for years.
U seem to be claiming for malpractices of last three years but the gravity of corruption was even intense before bhanwar.Then what abt the appointments prior to bhanwer?
Actually u r interested in corruption of those appointments for which u applied but couldn't qualify.Now decide by urself who is selfish?
And please come up with some decent tone and gentle wording ,keeping aside ur aggression.Raise ur argument rather than voice.
__________________
"Believe you can and you're halfway there"
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old Wednesday, March 01, 2017
Raja Bahar's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Larkana
Posts: 483
Thanks: 5
Thanked 286 Times in 180 Posts
Raja Bahar will become famous soon enough
Default

Brother you are looking so angry man! Don't worry one day you will get your job. I.am.not the decision maker neither I can declare whole the process null and void. There are hundreds who have been intentionally failed and they also deserve justice which means written part should be reconducted. If you think you are able enough surely you will qualify again.
Further more court is concerned with present CCE members that's why I am talking about it.
11000 thousand or 1100000 doesn't matter if the process is not done according to law. Such posts should be readvertised. How ever they should not be terminated and given chance to qualify again. If they prove their ability they must continue.
Every body has equal rights brother. If some candidates are working but they haven't gone through neat and clean process they must be terminated immediately. Again that is my personal opinion not court's. Surely court is the only authority to decide and what ever court decides I will accept it buddy.
__________________
Those who wait they get. (Own Creation)
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old Wednesday, March 01, 2017
Raja Bahar's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Larkana
Posts: 483
Thanks: 5
Thanked 286 Times in 180 Posts
Raja Bahar will become famous soon enough
Default

In Sindhi Essay paper majority of the students was failed intentionally so as some were failed in history and English Essay, Composition papers etc. They also deserve justice. At least CCE -2013 written part should be reconducted if 11000 remain on their posts.
After all they have kept reserved all key posts for their children and relatives which very much objectionable. It is not my personal matter nor I was declared fail in written part.
__________________
Those who wait they get. (Own Creation)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Asma Jilani ---- Vs---- Govt. of the Punjab sajidnuml Constitutional Law 5 Saturday, November 11, 2017 06:00 PM
Mercantile Law Prepartion letsfly Mercantile Law 2 Sunday, May 11, 2014 01:13 PM
The constitution of the islamic republic of pakistan, 1973[1] IMTIAZ AHMAD KHAN Constitutional Law 0 Thursday, February 14, 2013 05:40 PM
Timeline: Judiciary vs executive Call for Change Current Affairs 0 Tuesday, June 19, 2012 06:14 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.