Heigh-ho. Big blunders by me. I would surely try to be cautious in future.

Brother ! Should I practice expansion or essay on your given topics?

Many Thanks pal

@ exclusively
Dialogue is the best course to combat terrorism


Literally terrorism is an act of violence that has been damaging not only economy, political stability, and social fabric of country but also national integrity. A workable strategy should be chalked out to eradicate the roots of terrorism. Meanwhile, dialogue is deemed is the best tool to tame the monster of terrorism.

The origin of terrorism in Pakistan can be traced back in 1990’s, fall of Soviet Union. Pakistan was constrained in the chains of terrorism with the fall of Soviet Union, where Pakistan played a commendable role along with America to exodus the Russian forces from the Afghanistan’s soil. The America and Pakistan draw a combined strategy, and made a militant organization to score victory against Soviet Union. Ultimately the militant succeeded and embarked victory against the soviet forces. Aftermath, the situation caused severe and disastrous effects on social and economical fabric of the region. Moreover its intensity has increased after 9/11. Pakistan has become an ally with America on war on terrorism. Doubtless, the war was imposed on Pakistan by America. Meanwhile Pakistan has been paying the huge cost of war in casualties of innocents; suicide bombing has become common in the country. A part from that it has totally crippled the social and economical structure of the country. The war has been waging since thirteen long years, caused severe setbacks in all walks of life. American and allied forces have been combating war since thirteen years, to make the region prosperous and stable, but failed to eradicate the roots of terrorism.

From the above analysis, it would not be wrong to say that the use of arms and force have caused disaster to social and economic structure of the country. Meanwhile, dialogue is deemed as the best course to combat terrorism. An effective and workable plan must be chalked out, to perpetuate the dialogue process. The diplomats have to make a flexible policy, through which the best possible results can be achieved. Doubtless, dialogue is the only tool, which can contain the terrorism.

Man probes into space but not into himself

Man has subdued this perishable world but forgot his ownself. "Space" and "Self" are other forms of materialistic and spiritualistic approaches of life. Zenith of current era is beholden to the development of science and technology. Man is ready to mark indelible effects on Mars. Acme of mankind in the form of science and technology was foretold with full precision in Quran where Almighty has told that world has been made invincible for man.

Life contains its both aspects, spiritual and materialistic. Balance should be maintained in both to feel the true sense of life.But unfortunately, man has led itself astray from spiritual path and considered other part as whole.It is true that man has attained what it wished in the world, enjoyed all materialistic pleasure of life but lost internal peace and tranquillity. It has lost its innerself opposed to gentle words of Socrates who had said, "Know thyself"

Myriad problems of this world are man-made. Morality, honesty, civility infact all the valued esteems are at the lowest ebb. Rationale behind the social and moral decline is nothing but loss of self-esteem. Nexus of Prophets, saints, philosphers and activists advised just not to forget ourselves.

Life is neither just soul nor just body. Rather it is a beautiful blending of both. Conquering the world is commendable but not on the expense of inner peace and tranquillity of world.

The topic is about dialogue, though you have discussed about war on terror a lot. Dear give some examples that why dialogue is the best way to tackle terrorism. Besides, your weightage must be on dialogue not on the episode of history. I am not saying that this is not up to the mark, undoubtedly you have tackled the topic astonishingly but lacked in proving the statement. Just hit the topic, discuss a lot about the dialogue, history is just for the reference and examples are the main lethal weapons which will prove your statement.

Your next topic is

A hungry man is an angry man. This topic is very interesting one Hope you will attempt it to the level of perfection...

Best of luck...

Great dear, you are doing really nice. Good job. Your ideas are very mature. I have not deducted even a single mistake, but I want to suggest you one thing that be very crystal clear in your expressions, use small sentences. Overall your performance is up to the mark and if you keep the wheel of your practice moving on, I hope you will be doing miracles in your paper inshallah..

Stay Blessed..

A hungry man is an angry man

A person who feels hungry, thinks about his appetite only. The only aim is to feed his appetite and for this he will not care for any one else. He can go through any of the crucial times for his aim. The hunger may be of food, money, fame etc. But the lust and greed for all these materialistic things can make a man reckless, one can go to an extent where he will not pay heed to the "right" and "wrong".

We know, poverty and street crime in Pakistan is burgeoning. The poor people (hungry men) are going through poverty. They need food for their family and have to feed their appetite which enforces them to do any thing and they choose to be criminals (Angry men).
As it is rightly said by Aristotle,
"Poverty is the parent of revolution and crime"

__________________
Life is ten percent what happens to you and ninety percent how you respond to it.

@ exclusively

Thanks alot sir........... Im totally agreed to your point, i could not justify the proposition's theme point........

Sir can ask from you that which district do you belong in sindh?
I wanted to meet you, if possible?

Brother !
I need more practice in essay paper. I would be grateful if you suggest some most expected essays to be prepared on emergency basis.