Originally Posted by Natashaaa

IF YOU WISH FOR PEACE, PREPARE FOR WAR

ARISTOTLE SAID NOT SAYS

Originally Posted by Natashaaa

Aristotle 'said' is grammatically flawless

Originally Posted by aliya akbar

IF YOU WISH FOR PEACE, PREPARE FOR WARPeace is the need of man's character. All the good faith people's are the voters of peace. But peace is directly related to war and both the terms refers to the balance of power. The exact meaning of the phrase is, if one want a consistant and thorough peace, one must be strong and proficient enough to secure it by all time ready to give devestating defeat to its enemy. As Aristotle says : we make wars that we may live in peace.
An appropriate example is the Munich Aggrement ,which depict that hardly an ink of an aggrement had dried, hitler wage a war against britain. And britain suffer becuse of her neglegence.Freedom can only be maintained by guarding it properly, just as eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.
Country's peace can only be secure by thinking about war at the time of peace.Because strong , powerfull and commendable image of a country will let down the ill plans of an enemies. As Johan.F.Kennedy says: It is an unfortunate fact that we can secure peace only by preparing for wars. American leaders embosed these words and made all efforts to get strong hold on the world and their influence get them on a position of super power. American success is the prime example of the above saying. It can be concluded that peace belong to those only,who secure it by the guards of war.


Members please check it....i want to know that whether i m going in right direction or not.Thank you..

Originally Posted by ImranAhsen

Very good attempt sister. I am also making one. please commet.

Majority of the people in this world are in the favour of peace and prefer to live with harmony with the people of opposite believes and regions. An ordinary man never tries to find a way to quarrel with someone else. But it is also a bitter truth that if you want peace then you should be well prepared for the war. Every country has her own interests and purposes which she have to be fulfilled to get a lead from the rest of the world on the run of success and development. But all the wishes do not fulfilled with ease. As God has blessd different nations with different resources. Normally the most developed nations try to use their resources with their full potential and soon the resources got depleted. Then they turn to a country which is rich in resources but has weak in administration and military power. As the case is with Pakistan or Afghanistan. If Pakistan was strong enough to cope the Us pressure or Afghanistan had a very strong military power then US had to think twice to attack the Afghanis or to interfere the affairs of Pakistan.

Originally Posted by Da Skeptic

Majority of the people in this world are in the favour of peace and prefer to live with harmony with the people of opposite believes (beliefs) and regions. An ordinary man never tries to find a way to quarrel with someone else. But it is also a bitter truth that if you want peace then you should be well prepared for the war. Every country has her own interests and purposes which she have to be fulfilled (has to fulfill) to get a lead from the rest of the world on the run of success and development. But all the wishes do not fulfilled(cannot be fulfilled) with ease. As God has blessed different nations with different resources(incomplete sentence. It contains only a single clause. You may remove ‘As’ to make it a complete sentence). Normally the most developed nations try to use their resources with their full potential and soon the resources got(get) depleted. Then they turn to a country which is rich in resources but has weak in administration (has weak administration or is weak in administration) and military power. As the case is with Pakistan or Afghanistan (incomplete sentence). If Pakistan was(were.. the impossible takes were, not was.) strong enough to cope the Us pressure or Afghanistan had a very strong military power then US had to(would have to or would) think twice to attack the Afghanis or to interfere in the affairs of Pakistan.

Deviation from the topic..
Grammatical Mistakes..
Length is less than the required length..

Originally Posted by Da Skeptic

Majority of the people in this world are in the favour of peace and prefer to live with harmony with the people of opposite believes (beliefs) and regions. An ordinary man never tries to find a way to quarrel with someone else. But it is also a bitter truth that if you want peace then you should be well prepared for the war. Every country has her own interests and purposes which she have to be fulfilled (has to fulfill) to get a lead from the rest of the world on the run of success and development. But all the wishes do not fulfilled(cannot be fulfilled) with ease. As God has blessed different nations with different resources(incomplete sentence. It contains only a single clause. You may remove ‘As’ to make it a complete sentence). Normally the most developed nations try to use their resources with their full potential and soon the resources got(get) depleted. Then they turn to a country which is rich in resources but has weak in administration (has weak administration or is weak in administration) and military power. As the case is with Pakistan or Afghanistan (incomplete sentence). If Pakistan was(were.. the impossible takes were, not was.) strong enough to cope the Us pressure or Afghanistan had a very strong military power then US had to(would have to or would) think twice to attack the Afghanis or to interfere in the affairs of Pakistan.

Deviation from the topic..
Grammatical Mistakes..
Length is less than the required length..

Originally Posted by ImranAhsen

Thank you dear bro. This was my first expansion ever. I am working on it and will come with better one.