Originally Posted by Chauhdary12

To define extremism is quite tricky. (It is quite tricky to define extremism OR Extremism is quite tricky to define) In oecumenical way (Eecumenically) it can be defined as a hard and fast obligation of self made values and rules. There is an interesting aspect that no one anticipates itself (himself) as extremist. This term is always used for out group by the members of a specific group.

If we dive deep in the conceptual world we may come with (we find) that extremism can be in any sphere of life. A buff, for example, who self (no need of self here) annihilates itself (himself) due to failure in getting love is an extremist. A student, for an other example, (Let us take the example of a student) who says good bye to its studies as it stayed fail (he failed) to achieve a certain target in exams. A politician, mostly in case of a dictator, who (no need of who here) implies its policies with out agreement of senate, also falls in the category of extremism. There are as many varieties of extremists as many spheres of life.

Religion is no exception of it. Bajrang Dal, for instance, are Hindu who profess utter most practice of their faith. The movie "Slumdog Millionaire" well explains this approach in Hinduism. Christians who follow traditional Old Testament are labeled with this tag. Islam has exception of all, as praxis of other religion's fundamental virtues is extremism while in case of Islam it is moderators.

Review of psychology of an extremist demonstrates that it (he) has its (his) own world. It (He) interacts with outer world for two reasons. First being its (Firstly, for his) primary (basic) needs i.e. food,water etc, and second being (is) the wish to manipulate the outer world.

With a bit philosophical and scientific approach it can be articulated that extremism is a virus and man kind is carrier of it. This virus requires feasible environmental conditions (environment) at young age to flourish (nurture). If it gets proper conditions, (the required environment then) it grows and makes a young one an extremist.

If we have a look at symptoms and conditions of an extremist, we may infer that it (he) is suffering either from Alexithynia (Alexithymia) or Autism Spectrum Disorder. In some severe situations it (he) may suffer lack of empathy and even Psychopathy.

Stop (We need to stop) labeling (labelling) buffs, failures, dictators and suicide bombers as crazy and cruel. Instead they deserve our sympathy. They need Psychopathology.

Originally Posted by Ultimate CSP

Actually i used 'it' in place of he/she as using he makes the whole concept biased.

Originally Posted by Ultimate CSP

I think most of the mistakes are of punctuation.

Well, thanks a lot aariz.....

Originally Posted by Ultimate CSP

Unconditional foreign aid in a correct rhythm is genuine blessing. The aid which assist in improving economic conditions, enforce developmental projects and comes with decrement of impoverishment handicapping is a boon. Wide dispersion of prosperity in recipient country is attest of foreign aid's importance.
A country, for example, is fertile in reservoirs but poor in resources to have vantage of these reservoirs. Foreign aid to such a country can be benediction in handling resources in order to boom. After World War II, for another example, USA to reconstruct shattered European nations.

Foreign aid faces handful challenges as well. If it is not delivered properly, it does good only to corrupt leaders and does never compass targeted purport. If a nation has to compromise over its sovereignty in order to get aid then it becomes more fetal rather than a help. It does not ameliorate economic conditions and scathe the image of a country at international level.
In third world countries like Pakistan and Lebanon, for example, aid is used for political purposes and to construct villas for already rich and is never benefited by one for whom it is sent. More over foreign aid makes a nation dependent. Israel, for example, is receiving aid from USA until 1948 to date and is through and through dependent on it.
In most of the cases it implants longitudinal unobliging effects over a country when not delivered with sound conditions or used with proper management.(please correct me where i am wrong)

Originally Posted by Chauhdary12

No need to say thanks brother, I feel pleased to serve the aspirants of CSS

Originally Posted by Chauhdary12

Do not mind brother but you can not use 2nd or 3rd form with 'did'. It should be 'point' not 'pointed'.

Originally Posted by Chauhdary12

In most of the cases it (‘it’ is used for what? For aid?) implants longitudinal unobliging effects over (in) a country when (if) not delivered with sound conditions or used with proper management.

Originally Posted by Ultimate CSP

It is used for aid....

Originally Posted by Ultimate CSP

Impossible is some thing which can never come about and nothing on this earth is so. Mankind can beat whatever it essay. This cosmos is a mystery and how much human being strains to puzzle out it, it can chance upon that much of it. Human being is tycoon of this universe and how much it wants to have shift in this foundation it can have by clambering. When a man claims a target as unachievable, marks a mystery as unresolvable and titles risker conditions as inconceivable it stands to reason that he/she is not fighting. What is never called in question is out of question.

To clear up the idea with the help of as ordinary example as of a general who has given up, assumes that it is unimaginable to overcome his rivals. A dull student, for instance, takes it impossile to get the distinguish as he/she believes that it is insufferable. In fact he/she never tries to get it. Even an interovert can get the gift on the gab. Nothing in this world is impossible.
If we dive deep in the history of the mankind we come up that every impossible of one epoch is the possible of the next one. In past times, for instance, to cure Malaria was inconceivable but scientist tried its hand to discover a treatment and carried all before it. European, for another example never tried to expose new sea routs to India an d China. But when they tried by sending expedition to come across the new trade route, they lighted upon it. To be at the moon was a dream but journey to moon took it to taste. When one tries to trimuph an impossible, it remains so no longer. Every thing is possible.

We close with many things as impossible. Look up today's impossibles. Life on sun, for example, is not possible because no one ever called it in question. How ever when ever it will be, it will go off well in long run.

Going upon above examples it turns out that impossible is impossible because it is not being tried to make it possible. When it is tried it no longer remains impossible.Mark out mistakes please

Originally Posted by Ultimate CSP

Come true is right... but i think come about is not wrong???
stands to reason/ means........ almost stands for the same meaning????
come across/find....... stands for the same meaning?
close with/ leave???