Précis_____1975.
Attributes Of A True Statesman.
A true statesman is pragmatic, realistic and practical in his approach to solve problems of his nation. He does not support one group at the expense of the other. He completely knows the intensity of public protest, if he does not work for the basic rights of the citizens. He considers public opinion and moulds it as well. He realizes that people allow only such leader who cares for their national interests. He keeps an eye on every possibility either difficult of easy. He knows that impracticable, theoretical projects do not have any worth. So, he believes in completing the practical work by keeping an eye on real needs of the nation. An average leader wastes most of his time in making theoretical plans about structural reforms, peace and social system. And talking about them. These leaders focus their attention on rules and regulations rather taking care of national interests. While a true statesman does not care the rules or institutions but only the nation and its interests.
Total words: 537
Required: 179
In précis: 171

CSS -2012 past paper

Q.2. Make a precise of the following passage and suggest a suitable heading. (20)

One of the most ominous and discreditable symptoms of the want of candour in present-day sociology is the deliberate neglect of the population question. It is or should be transparently clear that if the State is resolved, on humanitarian grounds, to inhibit the operation of natural selection, some rational regulation of population, both as regards quantity and quality, is
imperatively necessary. There is no self-acting adjustment, apart from starvation, of numbers to the means of subsistence. If all natural checks are removed, a population in advance of the optimum number will be produced, and maintained at the cost of a reduction in the standard of living. When this pressure begins to be felt, that section of the population which is capable of reflection, and which has a standard of living which may be lost, will voluntarily restrict its numbers, even to the point of failing to replace deaths by an equivalent number of new births; while the underworld, which always exists in every civilised society the failures and misfits and derelicts, moral and physical will exercise no restraint, and will be a constantly increasing drain upon the national resources. The population will thus be recruited, in a very undue proportion, by those strata of society which do not possess the qualities of useful citizens.

The importance of the problem would seem to be sufficiently obvious. But politicians know that the subject is unpopular. The unborn have no votes. Employers like a surplus of labour, which can be drawn upon when trade is good. Militarists want as much food for powder as they can get. Revolutionists instinctively oppose any real remedy for social evils; they know that every unwanted child is a potential insurgent. All three can appeal to a quasi-religious prejudice, resting apparently on the ancient theory of natural rights, which were supposed to include the right of unlimited procreation. This objection is now chiefly urged by celibate or childless priests; but it is held with such fanatical vehemence that the fear of losing the votes which they control is a welcome excuse for the baser sort of politician to shelve the subject as inopportune. The Socialist calculation is probably erroneous; for experience has shown that it is aspiration, not desperation, that makes revolutions.


Title: "POPULATION EXPLOSION & ITS IMPACTS"

Precise: The fairness in the society for population is crucial. It can be seen in a state when it is based on the humanitarian level, and if laws restrict the biased selection process of the population. Unbiased selection checks can be sustained by reducing the standards of living of the whole population. But part of population having best standard of living can restrict this fairness without realizing any failures which are ingredients of the civilized society, and will hold the use the national resources. Hence that population is opted that do not have the civilized citizen’s competencies. In this way abundant issues will be emerged. The politicians, militarists and revolutionists will be the indulged in the religious prejudices, and loose the right of unlimited procreation. The ambitions can lead to change in the society, not the despondencies.

Please all criticize and evaluate my approach

Please every body evaluate my precise

Write precise of the following paragraphs.

Objectives pursued by, organizations should be directed to the satisfaction of demands resulting from the wants of mankind. Therefore, the determination of appropriate objectives for organized activity must be preceded by an effort to determine precisely what their wants are. Industrial organizations conduct market studies to learn what consumer goods should be produced. City Commissions make surveys to ascertain what civic projects would be of most benefit. Highway Commissions conduct traffic counts to learn what constructive programmes should be undertaken. Organizations come into being as a means for creating and exchanging utility. Their success is dependent upon the appropriateness of the series of acts contributed to the system. The majority of these acts is purposeful, that is, they are directed to the accomplishment of some objectives. These acts are physical in nature and find purposeful employment in the alteration of the physical environment. As a result utility is created, which, through the process of distribution, makes it possible for the cooperative system to endure.

Before the Industrial Revolution most cooperative activity was accomplished in small owner managed enterprises, usually with a single decision maker and simple organizational objectives. Increased technology and the growth of industrial organization made necessary the establishment of a hierarchy of objectives. This is turn, required a division of the management function until today a hierarchy of decision makers exists in most organizations.

The effective pursuit of appropriate objectives contributes directly to organizational efficiency. As used here, efficiency is a measure of the want satisfying power of the cooperative system as a whole. Thus efficiency is the summation of utilities received from the organization divided by the utilities given to the organization, as subjectively evaluated by each contributor.

The functions of the management process is the delineation of organizational objectives and the coordination of activity towards the accomplishment of these objectives. The system of coordinated activities must be maintained so that each contributor, including the manager, gains more than he contributes.(345)

Solution:
Title: "importance of objectives for an organization"

Precise: The objectives are crucial for every organization. The objectives of organization must be to satisfy the demands of the humanity. For this, knowing of the objectives’ purposes are pivotal. To know their objectives organization should make every possible effort. Organization’s success relies on acts of achievement’s objectives. These acts can be to gain meaningful employment in the competitive environment that is the source of utility. Before industrialization owners were the maker of decisions, so objectives were simple. But modern technology and increase of industrial organizations, led the top to bottom flow of the objectives. The effectiveness of the objectives contributes the efficiency of the organization. Managements should portray their aims, to gain objective’s purposes and more than what was contributed.

language as the source of education

[B][SIZE="4"]Q.2. Make a precise of the following passage and suggest a suitable heading. (20)

One of the most ominous and discreditable symptoms of the want of candour in present-day sociology is the deliberate neglect of the population question. It is or should be transparently clear that if the State is resolved, on humanitarian grounds, to inhibit the operation of natural selection, some rational regulation of population, both as regards quantity and quality, is
imperatively necessary. There is no self-acting adjustment, apart from starvation, of numbers to the means of subsistence. If all natural checks are removed, a population in advance of the optimum number will be produced, and maintained at the cost of a reduction in the standard of living. When this pressure begins to be felt, that section of the population which is capable of reflection, and which has a standard of living which may be lost, will voluntarily restrict its numbers, even to the point of failing to replace deaths by an equivalent number of new births; while the underworld, which always exists in every civilised society the failures and misfits and derelicts, moral and physical will exercise no restraint, and will be a constantly increasing drain upon the national resources. The population will thus be recruited, in a very undue proportion, by those strata of society which do not possess the qualities of useful citizens.

The importance of the problem would seem to be sufficiently obvious. But politicians know that the subject is unpopular. The unborn have no votes. Employers like a surplus of labour, which can be drawn upon when trade is good. Militarists want as much food for powder as they can get. Revolutionists instinctively oppose any real remedy for social evils; they know that every unwanted child is a potential insurgent. All three can appeal to a quasi-religious prejudice, resting apparently on the ancient theory of natural rights, which were supposed to include the right of unlimited procreation. This objection is now chiefly urged by celibate or childless priests; but it is held with such fanatical vehemence that the fear of losing the votes which they control is a welcome excuse for the baser sort of politician to shelve the subject as inopportune. The Socialist calculation is probably erroneous; for experience has shown that it is aspiration, not desperation, that makes revolutions.


Title: The Significance of population


The fairness in the society for population is crucial. If the state resolve humanitarian issues , it must b given the top priority otherwise it worsely effects everyone's standard of living .although there are few people who feel this pressure and try to control their number but uncivilized people will always be a strain upon national resources. although the problem of population seems to be very important but politicians eschew this issue. The politicians, militarists and revolutionists will be indulged in their aims, and the right of unlimited procreation will be lost. religious people disagree with politicians as they regard it as the sign of weakest politician who ignore population control only for the sake of his votes . Socialists experiences shows that The ambitions can lead to change in the society, not the despondences.

original para

We're dealing with a very dramatic and very fundamental paradigm shift here. You may try" to lubricate your' social interactions with personality techniques and skills, but in the process, you may truncate the vital character base. You can't have the fruits without the roots. It's the principle of sequencing: Private victory precedes Public Victory. Self-mastery and self-discipline are the foundation of good relationship with others. Some people say that you have to like yourself before you can like others. I think' that idea has merit but if you don't know yourself, if you don't control yourself, if you don't have mastery over yourself, it's very hard to like yourself, except in some short-term, psych-up, superficial way. Real self-respect comes from dominion over*self from true independence. Independence is an achievement. Inter dependence is a choice only independent people can make. Unless we are willing to achieve real independence, it's foolish to try to develop human relations skills. We might try. We might even have some degree of success when the sun is shining. But when the difficult times come - and they will - We won't have the foundation to keep things together. The most important ingredient we put into any relationship is not what we say or what we do, but what we are. And if our words and our actions come from superficial human relations techniques (the Personality Ethic) rather than from our own inner core (the character Ethic), others will sense that duplicity. We simply won't be able to create and sustain the foundation necessary" for effective interdependence. The techniques and skills that really make a difference in human interaction are the ones that almost naturally flow from a truly independent character. So the place to begin building any relationship is inside ourselves, inside our Circle of Influence, our own character. As we become independent - Proactive, centered in correct principles, value driven and able to organize and execute around the priorities in our life with integrity - we then can choose to become interdependent - capable of building rich, enduring, highly productive relationships with other people.

total words = 349
precis words =113

this is 2011 precis, kindly evaluate

unhappiness and its etiology

All the different psychological causes of unhappiness have something in common. A dissatisfied youth becomes a typical unhappy man, who leads a unidirectional life in pursuit of contentment, neglecting the associated activities. Nowadays, it is common to find a man who indulges in temporary pleasures. He is hopeless of finding satisfaction, unlike a man of personality disorder who only uses wrong means to attain it. Unhappy man is proud of it and should be shown a way to achieve happiness. very few men would choose misery. However, Wise men think unhappiness is a reasonable approach and are proud of it and attribute it to the nature of the universe. Common men doubt the genuiness of their unhappiness.http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-past-...er-2011-a.html

first lines need to precise in this way a common unhappy human does not find contentment ,hence makes it life uni direction ,rest is good short precis . nice efforts

Your attempt seems good. But you need more and more work in it to the level of perfection. I would say it is an average attempt. Try to be very clear and simple in your ideas what you have got from the original write up...


Be Blessed...

One of the most ominous and discreditable symptoms of the want of candour in present-day sociology is the deliberate neglect of the population question. It is or should be transparently clear that if the State is resolved, on humanitarian grounds, to inhibit the operation of natural selection, some rational regulation of population, both as regards quantity and quality, is
imperatively necessary. There is no self-acting adjustment, apart from starvation, of numbers to the means of subsistence. If all natural checks are removed, a population in advance of the optimum number will be produced, and maintained at the cost of a reduction in the standard of living. When this pressure begins to be felt, that section of the population which is capable of reflection, and which has a standard of living which may be lost, will voluntarily restrict its numbers, even to the point of failing to replace deaths by an equivalent number of new births; while the underworld, which always exists in every civilised society the failures and misfits and derelicts, moral and physical will exercise no restraint, and will be a constantly increasing drain upon the national resources. The population will thus be recruited, in a very undue proportion, by those strata of society which do not possess the qualities of useful citizens.

The importance of the problem would seem to be sufficiently obvious. But politicians know that the subject is unpopular. The unborn have no votes. Employers like a surplus of labour, which can be drawn upon when trade is good. Militarists want as much food for powder as they can get. Revolutionists instinctively oppose any real remedy for social evils; they know that every unwanted child is a potential insurgent. All three can appeal to a quasi-religious prejudice, resting apparently on the ancient theory of natural rights, which were supposed to include the right of unlimited procreation. This objection is now chiefly urged by celibate or childless priests; but it is held with such fanatical vehemence that the fear of losing the votes which they control is a welcome excuse for the baser sort of politician to shelve the subject as inopportune. The Socialist calculation is probably erroneous; for experience has shown that it is aspiration, not desperation, that makes revolutions.

Neglect to the population question
Formality in sociology has led to the deliberate ignorance of the population question. Population must be regulated both quantitatively and qualitatively even if the government wants to obstruct natural selection. starvation is the only autonomous quantitative regulator. without restraint, overpopulation and a consequent decline in standard of living results. therefore, the threatened section often reduces their number voluntarily even resulting in negative balance. Meanwhile, the less desirable section continues to proliferate and is even hired inappropriately by the lesser populated society.the significance of issues is well known, even though beneficiaries refute it. They object on the superficial-religious grounds derived from ancient law permitting unrestrained reproduction. Yet, they hold back from supporting the clergy with the fear of losing achieved objectives. contrary to the socialist views, real change is brought by the people with vision and not merely by people. (139)

kindly evaluate, i have read some other attempted precis and i feel either i or they have changed the very context of the text. be frank in criticism. thanks for your timely and and corrective evaluation green boy and exclusively