Originally Posted by Great Afnan

I- Introduction
II- The war on terror and its relevence to abuse of human rights:
The context of Pakistan.
A- Alienation and Vindictiveness of Al-Qaeda Led To
Violence,blatantly transgressing:
(i) The Right To Live Safe,Healthy and Dignified Life
(ii) The Right To Religious Freedom
(iii) The Right To Fair Trial
(iii) The Right To Conduct Economic Affairs
(v) The Right To Go To Schools And Colleges.
B- Anti-Westernism Among Islamic Extremists and Youth
Radicalization Flagrantly Violated:
(i) The Right To Political Participation
(ii) The Right To Female Education
(ii) The Right To Get Public Health Services
(iv) The Right To Freedom Of Expression
C- Drone Attacks And The Plight Of Tribal Areas:
(i) Heavy Bombardment And Killing of Innocents
(ii) Health Deterioration And Birth Defects
(iii) Mass Migration And Sufferings
III- The War On Terror Subjected The People Of Iraq
And Afghanistan To Endless Miseries:
(i) Defiling Of Holy Places By Militants
(ii) Government-Militant Tussle Perishing Innocent Civilians
(iii) The Rise Of IS Consigned The Masses To Unrelenting
Rights' Abuses
IV- The War On Terror Portrayed Unjustified Negative Image
Of Muslims Internationally:
(i) Stigmatizing And Stereotyping of The Muslims Abroad
(ii) Arbitrary Detention Of Muslims In Guantanamo Bay
(iii) Profanic Religious Cartoons Hurting Muslims'
Sentiments
(iv) Reluctance to Accomodate ill-Fated Refugees
V- There Is Need to Re-define and Re-strategize The Goals Of
War Through Multilateralism and Development Of Counter
Narratives.
VI- Conclusion:

Originally Posted by faiza rajput

I am just saying what I felt, I can be wrong, so take expert advice becuase I am already confuse about this topic.

Originally Posted by princeling

VIOLENCE IS THE LAST REFUGE OF INCOMPETENT

introduction

psychological connection between incompetency and violence
1.borderline persnality disorder perspective
2.concept of conflict and frustration
3.environmental factors

an inability to compete leads to beginning of violence
1.domestic violence against women is perpetuated by economically incompetent and intellectually deficient men
2.violence is reflected in incompetent societies which are deficient in resources and academically inept
3.weak regimes begin to use violence in order to hide their incompetence

violence is used when prospects of success shrink
1.indiscriminate killings become common when days of anti state elements are numbered
2.resort to holding hostages and hijackings
3.funding and abetting crimes become only option when outlaws are cornered
4.military cannons are turned towards protestors when control over government starts slipping away

violence is used by incompetents when they realize power cannot be grabbed through legitimate channels
1.religiously motivated global and intra-state struggles
2.spreading terror through media and other methods to find acceptance among citizens
3.weak ideologies legitimizes violence in quest for power

states resort to violence when they lack competency
1.suppress voice of people and thwart self determination through armed forces
2.oppressive laws to maintain order
3.weak governments create outside enemies to divert attention of people from socio economic failures

failure to achieve economic ends lead to violence in many forms
1.acts of individual robberies
2.methods of extortion and black market used by non state actors
3.bombings and staging wars used by imperial powers

conclusion

is it relevant ?? the thing i always feared is relevancy

Originally Posted by Great Afnan

What do you mean by equivocation?and why did you comment on incomplete outline?

Originally Posted by mustansar~hussain

Very bad attempt dear.

Originally Posted by faiza rajput

I am just saying what I felt, I can be wrong, so take expert advice becuase I am already confuse about this topic.

Originally Posted by princeling

you tried good attempt . but most of your essay is ambiguous as mustansar has already pointed out. most of your points are irrelevant and nor clear . you have to write about how extra judicial killings, arbitrary detentions, drone strikes, night raids by american speciall forces violating privacies, nsa surveilances, abuses in abu gharib jails etc , disappearances of citizens ,misuse of agency powers, ever expanding sweeping powers of agencies, restriction of freedoms so on and so forth are contributing to human rights violations . this essay has nothing to do with tarnishing of muslim image, radicalization ,miseries of iraqi people ..try to be specific

Originally Posted by princeling

can you elaborate your view point please ?

Originally Posted by hazelnut

Great nations win without fighting.
Outline:
 Introduction: The greatness of a nation is never earned in the battlefield.
 Example of the USA:
• The Monroe doctrine
• Emergence of USA after WW-II as super-power
 What is the real greatness of a nation
 Drawbacks of fighting: War has always been a recipe for depredation
• Economic setback
• Political setback( e.g. USA’s foreign policy on retreat)
• Psychological and social effects
 Today war is a negative sum game
 Benefits to nations who avoid war
• Cutting down the military expenditure
• Focus on development and nation-building
• Exalted standing in comity of nations
 How to win without fighting
• Economic growth( e.g. China vs. USA)
• Multinational corporations ( theory of neo-colonialism)
• Fourth generation warfare (Sun Tzu’s saying: The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.)
• Media warfare due to globalization
 Challenges to Pakistan and use of soft power
• Victory earned by hard power is short-lived
 Conclusion