Originally Posted by musmanhussain

NEXT TOPIC OF ESSAY:
Pakistan:An Unsuitable Country to be Run Democratically.
All of you please share your write-up on the above topic.

Originally Posted by musmanhussain

NEXT TOPIC OF ESSAY:
Pakistan:An Unsuitable Country to be Run Democratically.
All of you please share your write-up on the above topic.

Originally Posted by faiza rajput

Globalisation: A new form of Colonialism

1) Introduction

2) Globalisation as a mean of controlling resources
i) Large MNCs control foreign resources
(1) Land resources
(2) Human resources
(3) Technological resources
(4) Natural resources
ii) CPEC and control of Gawadar
iii) Recodeck Sandeck project
iv) OPEC

3) Globalisation as a mean of controlling governements
a) Large MNCs affect their domestic government resources
b) Free Trade Agreement used as leverage

4) Imposition of foreign culture and degradation of local culture
a) Fast Food culture around the world
b) Jeans culture around the world
c) Cultural proliferation through movies
d) Effects on languages

5) Globalisation and brain drain in third world/developing countries

6) Global media: mean of controlling world

7) Globalisation of education and control of world

8) International institutions: IMF, World Bank, UN

9) International Governmental Organisations

10) Conclusion

Originally Posted by mustansar~hussain

Impeccably justified; 85+/100.

Originally Posted by faiza rajput

would it be wise to write against democracy in Pakistan in the paper of CIVIL SERVICES?????

Originally Posted by Mohammed Uzair

TOPIC : CLIMATE CHANGE:INACTION IS COSTLIER THAN ACTION

1) INTRODUCTION

Thesis: Certainly,inaction on the issue of climate change would be costlier than action. Failure to address the issue of climate change would entail irreparable damages while addressing it would entail temporary setbacks on some socio-economic fronts

2) COSTS OF ADDRESSING THE ISSUE OF CLIMATE CHANGE
2.1) Cuts on carbon emissions would dampen economic growth( Example of BRICS)
(2.2) Hefty sums of money would be consumed in the pursuit of sustainability.
(2.3) Population associated with oil industry would suffer a great deal, temporarily.

(3) COSTS OF NOT ADDRESSING THE ISSUE OF CLIMATE CHANGE
(3.1) Damage to water sector
(3.2) Agricultural sector would receive a great blow
(3.3) Forestry sector would be harmed
(3.4) Public Health would suffer
(3.5) Damage to infrastructure
(3.6) Hydropower potential would be affected
(3.7) Threat to the existence of Climate Vulnerability Forum(CVF) and resulting mass migration

(4) WHY NOT ADDRESSING THE ISSUE OF CLIMATE CHANGE WOULD BE COSTLIER THAN ADDRESSING IT
(4.1) Addressing the issue would result a temporary setback to economic growth and would entail a change in priority. However, humans, as history has shown time and again, would adapt with the change with due course of time; and in the presence of technology, the adaptation wouldn't be hard.
(4.2) Failure to address the issue of climate change would entail irrevocable damages on the socio-economic and political fronts( as mentioned above)

(5) How should world collaborate in addressing this issue--Way forward
(5.1) Agreement reached in COP 21 should be relentlessly implemented
(5.2) Developed World should take the lead
(5.3) Research and Development in the domain of sustainability
(5.4) Kyoto Protocol and other agreements should be revised to suit the magnitude of contemporary challenges vis-a-vis climate change

(6) CONCLUSION

Originally Posted by Mohammed Uzair

TOPIC : CLIMATE CHANGE:INACTION IS COSTLIER THAN ACTION

1) INTRODUCTION

Thesis: Certainly,inaction on the issue of climate change would be costlier than action.


"Failure to address the issue of climate change would entail irreparable damages while addressing it would entail temporary setbacks on some socio-economic fronts" ((Only this statement is sufficient. Remember one thing about thesis statement: shorter is better))

2) COSTS OF ADDRESSING THE ISSUE OF CLIMATE CHANGE
2.1) Cuts on carbon emissions would dampen economic growth

(2.2) Hefty sums of money would be consumed in the pursuit of sustainability.

(2.3) Population associated with oil industry would suffer a great deal, temporarily.



(3) COSTS OF NOT ADDRESSING THE ISSUE OF CLIMATE CHANGE
(3.1) Damage to water sector
(3.2) Agricultural sector would receive a great blow
(3.3) Forestry sector would be harmed
(3.4) Public Health would suffer
(3.5) Damage to infrastructure
(3.6) Hydropower potential would be affected
(3.7) Threat to the existence of Climate Vulnerability Forum(CVF) and resulting mass migration

(4) WHY NOT ADDRESSING THE ISSUE OF CLIMATE CHANGE WOULD BE COSTLIER THAN ADDRESSING IT
(4.1) Addressing the issue would result a temporary setback to economic growth and would entail a change in priority. However, humans, as history has shown time and again, would adapt with the change with due course of time; and in the presence of technology, the adaptation wouldn't be hard.

((too long to fit in an outline))


(4.2) Failure to address the issue of climate change would entail irrevocable damages on the socio-economic and political fronts( as mentioned above)

(5) How should world collaborate in addressing this issue--Way forward
(5.1) Agreement reached in COP 21 should be relentlessly implemented
(5.2) Developed World should take the lead
(5.3) Research and Development in the domain of sustainability
(5.4) Kyoto Protocol and other agreements should be revised to suit the magnitude of contemporary challenges vis-a-vis climate change

(6) CONCLUSION

Originally Posted by faiza rajput

Climate change: Inaction is costlier than action
a) Introduction

b) Climate change is costing us:
(i) Our prevailing weather pattern
(ii) Our prevailing cropping pattern
(iii) Our healthy lives by generating drastic effects
(iv) Billions of dollars spend on reconstruction of annihilation caused by calamities
(v) Healthy economic activity
a. Comparatively shorter winter period: Decrease demand of winter cloth

c) Cost of action for reducing the pace of climate change
i) Reduction in carbon emission led to reduced economic activity
ii) Change in comfortable lifestyle: Lesser use of refrigerator, cars, AC etc
iii) Cost associated with reduction of greenhouse gases
iv) Cost of spreading awareness about climate change consequences and its remedies
v) Cost of plantation of new trees and preservation of existing one
vi) Cost of efficient handling of household waste instead of burning it
vii) Cost of exploration of environment friendly energy instead of coal and oil use

d) Cost of inaction and letting climate change proceed
i) Ecosystems of different regions will hurt irreparably
ii) Weather will change permanently leaving severe effects on indigenous culture
iii) Lesser food options will be available
iv) Air will be too intoxicated to breathe without suffering
v) Oceans and rivers will eat land creating severe habitat problems
vi) Desertification will be at its peak

e) Required Actions for tackling climate change problem
i) Compliance with Kyoto protocol and Cop21
ii) Strict measurements against divergent states
iii) Increase awareness at mass level

f) conclusion


Members, waiting for comments....!!!!!