#51
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
All the best and hope to see you amongst the qualifiers. |
#52
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
(1) Great Nations (2) Win (3) Fighting- With or without. After reading your outline, i felt like that your essay was not revolving around these keywords. I liked your introductory points.
__________________
"watuAAizzu man tashao watuzhillu man tashao" |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
All those who are interpreting fighting as struggle,just tell me why would the examiner give such a statement which makes no sense.
"great nations win without struggle" seems like an extremely stupid statement. if anyone still persists that it was the statement,please give some arguments to prove your point. |
#54
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
He that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow (Ecclesiastes 1:18) |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
if he wanted to trap us,he would have given some statement which could be written in favor of.Giving a statement like "everyone is a fool" and assuming that people will write in favor of it and get trapped is not the caliber of CSS essay paper setter. As I said earlier,can I get some arguments or examples in favor of "great nations win without struggle"(so called trap)? |
#56
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
He that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow (Ecclesiastes 1:18) |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
My take on this is - The more we squeeze the borders when defining a term, the less we are left with to write on. Its a 2000+ words essay and we cant limit 'fighting' to just 'bombarding' and 'troops'.
If we were to write on 'A hungry man can go to any extreme', we cant just stick to the dictionary definition of a 'man' and make the whole essay revolve around that. The sagacious writer will expand the meaning of a 'man' to a 'man, society, nation etc'. I will agree that if we keep our focus on just the nation-nation fight and write a comprehensive essay with supportive arguments and examples, it will suffice. But those, who widen the meaning of the term fight and win are doing NO wrong either if their arguments are convincing. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
[QUOTE=Buddha;728892]Why are you asking for the proposition arguments? Does existence of proposition arguments warrant the existence of meaningfulness of the term where only opposition arguments hold true?
yes,the existence of at least a few proposition arguments warrant the existence of meaningfulness of the term. khair it is another debate. U said it was a trap but the definition of a trap includes a piece of cake or cheese to attract the prey.I am sorry i cannot find an incentive in this statement by your interpretation. that is why i was asking for proposition arguments. @roshan. I agree that it depends on the examiner if he finds one's arguments convincing but again,during css 2013 the examiner was very brutal. |
#59
|
||||
|
||||
Stop getting into it deeper. Just wait. Let the examiner announce what he wanted us to write.
Allah karay ap saray pass hon. Ameen
__________________
"Whomever Allah guides, no one can misguide, and whomever Allah misguides, no one can guide." Al-Qura'an. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Its not about who is right or who is wrong. Its about sharing our views.
I learnt a lot from members who replied to this thread. We must not care how lengthy a thread gets or why people argument - We must appreciate that people take out time to respond and share their views - and someone like me, learns a lot while debating. So no 'STOP' to this thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
International Relations: Theories and application | Fortune | International Relations | 0 | Sunday, March 27, 2011 02:37 PM |
Growth In United Nations Membership 1945-2006 | MUKHTIAR ALI | Current Affairs | 1 | Monday, January 15, 2007 11:49 AM |
The KASHMIRI WAR: Human Rights and Humanitarian Law 1996 | ahsanghalib | Pakistan Affairs | 2 | Tuesday, December 26, 2006 12:46 PM |
United Nations | Naseer Ahmed Chandio | International Relations | 0 | Thursday, December 14, 2006 02:15 PM |