#61
|
||||
|
||||
[QUOTE=Ozia;729051]
Quote:
If examiners were brutal in CE-2013, it does not, necessarily means that they will follow the same approach. I have been following CE-papers/results from 2011 and what i found interesting is that now examiners like diversity of ideas/concepts rather than the pet/crammed stuff. |
The Following User Says Thank You to micho For This Useful Post: | ||
mhz99 (Wednesday, June 11, 2014) |
#62
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"watuAAizzu man tashao watuzhillu man tashao" |
#63
|
||||
|
||||
[QUOTE=Ozia;729051]
Quote:
As you said Great Nations win without 'struggle' is an extremely stupid statement and it harbors no valid arguments. Then, it will only strengthen the stance of the person writing against the topic! Let's say I write an essay against the topic Great Nations win without 'struggle', there will be no counter-arguments to deal with and I only have to give my arguments against the topic! Existence of counter-arguments only weaken your stance. For example, there is this essay topic Free Speech should have limitations. No one would argue for Free Speech should have no limitations because that would be absurd! There are no strong arguments for unfettered, unmonitored, libelous and slanderous free speech! In fact counter-arguments in this case don't really exist! Therefore, it won't be an issue to interpret 'fighting' as 'struggle'. Why? because as I mentioned in one of my previous comments, that the word 'fighting' is open to interpretation because it is an ambiguous term. What you're doing is using reductio ad absurdum for justification albeit faulty and throwing out the 'struggle' interpretation of the term on the basis of non-existence of counter-arguments which will only weaken one's stance!!
__________________
He that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow (Ecclesiastes 1:18) |
The Following User Says Thank You to Buddha For This Useful Post: | ||
Antalpur (Monday, March 30, 2015) |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Struggle is the key.
|
#65
|
|||
|
|||
|
#66
|
||||
|
||||
i gave a superficial look to all the comments from the start,found many people confused which reminds me of my Essay in 2013.I attempted Not economy but politics is a key to success,anyhow leave this i am not going into detail,as i failed that essay.
This time in 2014,before going to the essay paper i was repeatedly recalling my mistake which i made in 2013,that is went for the essay about which i was not completely cleared...Due to this experience i went for privatization of higher education essay in 2014,at least i was clear about what the checker wants from me.Now God forbid if i fail essay this time too,i would be sure that there lie some other weak areas in my essay other than irrelevancy. i pray that all of us who have work hard become csp's,but it would be also pertinent to mention for the aspirants,that please go for the essay about which you are completely clear,believe me i have seen many average people passing essay paper with flying colors,their main concern was to keep their essay relevant to the last line and this is what they did. Now coming to the Great nation essay,everyone knows what mistakes they have made,so its better to be silent.Fighting and criticizing won't give you anything.Indeed, CSS CAN BE PASSED WITHOUT FIGHTING.
__________________
A fool says what he knows,and a wise man knows what he says. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to zeeshan marwat For This Useful Post: | ||
Roshnain Swati (Sunday, June 15, 2014), The Shah Ends (Sunday, June 15, 2014) |
#67
|
||||
|
||||
I think it means : Great Nations surpass others by avoiding wars and having peaceful stance like having trade, education etc. Because modern wars demand more money, making even attacker pay largely by compromising economy used for prospering the nation. And if the same money is spent wisely plus having peaceful environment, it is moving towards developing it and surpassing others.
Is it right? Greatest example : The State of Madinah signed the charter for peace and ultimately Muslims over ran the Makkah al Haraam without a sword in hand.
__________________
“When you do things from your soul, you feel a river moving in you, a joy.” ― Rumi |
The Following User Says Thank You to Hideous Ahsen For This Useful Post: | ||
Roshnain Swati (Sunday, June 15, 2014) |
#68
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Whomever Allah guides, no one can misguide, and whomever Allah misguides, no one can guide." Al-Qura'an. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to The Shah Ends For This Useful Post: | ||
Hideous Ahsen (Sunday, June 15, 2014), zeeshan marwat (Sunday, June 15, 2014) |
#69
|
||||
|
||||
Yes Struggle is the Key.
Yes it can be a dimension of the the struggle. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"watuAAizzu man tashao watuzhillu man tashao" |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
International Relations: Theories and application | Fortune | International Relations | 0 | Sunday, March 27, 2011 02:37 PM |
Growth In United Nations Membership 1945-2006 | MUKHTIAR ALI | Current Affairs | 1 | Monday, January 15, 2007 11:49 AM |
The KASHMIRI WAR: Human Rights and Humanitarian Law 1996 | ahsanghalib | Pakistan Affairs | 2 | Tuesday, December 26, 2006 12:46 PM |
United Nations | Naseer Ahmed Chandio | International Relations | 0 | Thursday, December 14, 2006 02:15 PM |