#81
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
CanditGuy -> Even If she agreed that her father was a traitor and even If The Indian general supported the mukti bahinis (which we all know the Indians did supported them) then what do you want to prove? Your OWN COUNTRY COMMISSION HAS SAID THAT THE ARMY RAPED and KILLED Everyone from civil servants to professionals and LOOTED and ROBBED people and that OUR GENERAL WAS A WOMANIZER .. THIS IS THE SAYINGS OF OUR OWN COMMISSION by those people who were given the job to investigate into the matter and I have already mentioned the Commission name .. why don't you look it up? Then Put that a side and go for neutral sources, they will put your commission report to shame as the figures of the raped and killed are much much more than in our report. Even a BIASED report couldn't defend them (HRC) and you are here trying to defend them? Do you think you have more knowledge and/or understanding of things than people at that time who were directly involved in stuff and were given the task of the findings :/ |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
The Following User Says Thank You to candidguy For This Useful Post: | ||
SADIA SHAFIQ (Saturday, June 18, 2011) |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
turn the table of thinking
Sallams: please study the Game theory of International Relations you would find your answer and stop thinking like hopeless people of Pakistan, now its time that the table of Game theory is turning please analyze the words of Army chief, political leaders. |
#84
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
@ mukt No body in this world is neutral. This is a basic thing we all have to understand.
__________________
A successful person is one who can lay a firm foundation with the bricks that other throw at him. (David Brinkley) Last edited by Silent.Volcano; Saturday, June 18, 2011 at 11:32 PM. |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Bangalis If give figures or if indians, we can say that "OH NO THEY WERE DIRECTLY INVOLVED AND HENCE CANNOT BE TRUSTED AND ITS A FALSE FIGURE" but in this case our own country COMMISSION has agreed and neutral sources are those who were not from bangladesh or india but who were writing on International affairs. And Even Then If you argue that "OH NO STILL NO ONE IS NEUTRAL" then You mean to say that the system of "GAWAAH" and/or Witness should also be removed as per your explanation because a biased witness cannot carry weight in both Islamic and other Law(s). So You mean to say that God also did not know that there will be NO NEUTRAL people on earth who can testify as "witnesses" ? Think before you talk, Good sir |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
Mr mukt,Look,we all know that it was injustice on the part of pakistani Govt(and misdemeanors of Pakistani bureaucrats)that had called for all the events that followed,mukti bahni (who according to Sam Manekshaw were hindus)had started indiscriminate killing of pakistani bureaucrats and their families,Pakistan army had to reciprocated with the same stuff.That was unavoidable my brother.there was no other way out.what would have YOU done had you been in yahya khan's shoes?
And as for neutral spectators,If the effectees(bangalis i.e haseena wajid) and culprits(for us i.e Indian general) have confessed that Pakistan was clean(I don't say that,its them),is there any need of looking for what neutral spectators say? |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
What would I have done? I would have NEVER surrendered and/or killed and/or Raped innocent civilians. I would have preferred to fight till death with the Indian army. When you say there was no way out makes me laugh, the way out as per your Intelligent way of thought became the reason of fall of bangla :/ Quote:
2 - Even If you ignore point 1, you still fail to understand that haseena wajid and Indian general are just 2 people. The bangali people were also directly effected then why do you ignore when they too say that The army was involved in all sort of war crimes and why do you Ignore the Indian authors as well who write that Pakistani army was involved in war crimes that includes but is not limited to raping, killing etc .. It's like a hundred thousand people saying something and you pick up only 2 from them and say "THESE 2 are RIGHT, THE OTHERS ARE WRONG WHATEVER THEY SAY" lol. The majority of the effectees are against your opinion so why do you quote only 2 people of your choice? Lastly, I have not seen Haseena saying that Pak army never raped and/or killed anyone neither have I read about Indian general saying that we sent our ppl to do the rapes and pak army never did it (but even if they said so) then what about our own acceptance? |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
Haseena wajid is the prime minister of Bangladesh(representing her country) and Sam was the mastermind of Indian campaign(hence represents whole of India).You only understand binary logic hence you can't see more than two levels.Wish I had a binary to decimal converter cum inverter that could help you see more than 2 levels,and convert your logical low(0) to a logical high.haha..
I'm not defending anyone here,cuz meray chachay mamay nahin lagte wo.But I have a strong feeling now k aapka pura name mukti bahini hi hai.LOL!as pointed out by fellow god of war. No offense.. |
#89
|
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
Just because She was PM does not necessarily means she will be right all the time. If you think that a "PM" truly represents his/her country then do you really think Gillani is representing us in a true sense? The people of bangal do represent their country and many of them have clearly stated what the truth is and also we (pakistanis) do know the truth as well. Moreover, Kindly can you copy/paste (in context) about what exactly the Indian general said? I want to see If he really meant to say that "The rapes and killing were performed by us, pakistani army was completely innocent and we made them look like that" I seriously would like to read this Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
#90
|
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I like and at times defend Army for I don't see any other department worth appreciation.I also know they don't have an immaculate record;they are the best of the worst lot.If some one could prove that they were the perpetrators of rapes and things like that.I would damn them more than any one else. Last edited by Silent.Volcano; Saturday, June 18, 2011 at 11:29 PM. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pakistan's History From 1947-till present | Sumairs | Pakistan Affairs | 13 | Sunday, October 27, 2019 02:55 PM |
Statistics and Probability | obaidkhan | Statistics | 3 | Friday, August 23, 2013 02:51 PM |
Fall Of Dhaka | kakasepahee | Pakistan Affairs | 10 | Friday, August 21, 2009 07:17 PM |
indo-pak relations | atifch | Current Affairs | 0 | Monday, December 11, 2006 09:01 PM |