Kargil controversy

maria khan · #1 Sunday, September 10, 2006

What do you people think, is this true that Pak military didn't inform ex-establishment before commencing kargil operation?

darandaz · #2 Wednesday, September 13, 2006

salaam,
ok the govt was definitely informed by the army about the actual posn because this is simply not possible that there is something happening in the country and she is ignorant.how possible?also that was the act of freedom fighters,
"jane najane gul hi najane
bagh to sara jane hai"

bye n t c.

MHMALIK · #3 Saturday, September 16, 2006

Freedom fighters eh? and how, pray tell, did the "freedom fighters" get hold of POF built standard army issue G3A1 assault rifles which were shown on BBC? oh lemme guess.. they stole them??

My humble advice to all on this forum, please kindly refrain from passing comments that cannot be solidly substantiated. You will lose marks in CSS and then curse fate and blame everyone else. Also, ISPR is not a very credible source of information, so whenever you relate some news, always mention that this is what ISPR released.

darandaz · #4 Saturday, September 16, 2006

salaam,
oh dear dear,i dont know why the US and her allies dont blame russians, german,few more for all the terrorist activities,all the mafia ,and every unlawful activity coz they all use AK $& that is kalashnikocv,either made in russia,germany or egypt?

my dear if an atomic bomb can be stolen coz you know the first ever atomic bomb that was used as well was stolen,you know it was german scientist who made it.my dear the scientist was trapped taken to us bomb made and used so that was also stolen,shouldnt be very much worrid about the G-3 ok, talking about marks so dear never ever in my life bothered about marks our job always to make an effort and rest leave to al mighty ok.
T C and bye.

maria khan · #5 Tuesday, September 19, 2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by darandaz

salaam,
also that was the act of freedom fighters,

Dear darandaz, would u mind adducing this statement of urs?

Waiting.................................

darandaz · #6 Wednesday, September 20, 2006

[QUOTE=maria khan]Dear darandaz, would u mind adducing this statement of urs?

salaam,
sure why not maria khan but normally there are no material proof for such things.any how had that been the army act the pak artillery must have supported their army,the air force must have supported that but nothing of that sort happened so it is evident that it was the part of freedom struggle of mujahideens. every body know that army supported afghan mujahideens against russian invasion but that is known as freedom fighters efforts so the same might have been the case here as well.

dear thjis is what i think, what you say.................
no harsh feelings , ok
T C and salaam.

maria khan · #7 Friday, September 29, 2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by darandaz

salaam,
sure why not maria khan but normally there are no material proof for such things.any how had that been the army act the pak artillery must have supported their army,the air force must have supported that but nothing of that sort happened so it is evident that it was the part of freedom struggle of mujahideens. every body know that army supported afghan mujahideens against russian invasion but that is known as freedom fighters efforts so the same might have been the case here as well.

On September 24th, 2006, a premiere of President General’s book “IN THE LINE OF FIRE” held in New York, in that book President has written that a complete briefing on Kargil was given to Mr. Nawaz Sharif on February 5th, 1999, and right after that with the assistance of freedom fighters with FCNA war was commenced. So you are provided a solid material proof about this aspect that had made us all in qualms.
So what else Mr. Nawaz Sharif has asserted that he was unaware about Kargil operation is nothing but as exercise in futility.

ALLAH PE AMAN

Liaquat Ali Khan · #8 Friday, September 29, 2006

Hi all

i m surprised that there are people who believe that Pak Army was not directly involved in the Kargil issue but it was the action of the Mujahidin. I think there is a confusion coz ISPR and F.O. during the war were beating about the bush that Mujahidin have taken action against the Indian Army. (Only fool will believe that) Pak Army was involved in it, Mr. Musharraf in 2000 himself acknowldged in an interview that Pakistan army took pre-emptive measures across the border. If this wasnt the case than how come there Indian supply line was in the firing range from just a K.M. away.

I m proud that my army took action for, what belongs to Pakistan. I think we need to move forward on the discussion and discuss y army took this action and was it worthwhile going into the conflict despite Lahore decleration.

irum · #9 Friday, September 29, 2006

Assalamoalikum!
That's fact
Kargil is again a burning issue of the day

Liaquat Ali Khan · #10 Friday, September 29, 2006

In my view, Kargil war would have yielded result in Pakistan's favour,had that war being fought about 20 or 30 years ago. No doubt planning was skillful but planners failed to realise the geo-political environment and Nuclear capabiltity of the two nations. Certainly both nations restrained but it was a potential nuclear flash point. It was the reason that it got such attention from around the globe. Those who believe that this issue brought Kashmir on the agenda of the world powers they live in fools paradise. Nothing has been done since than it only added to our image that Hawks are stronger here who have derailed the peace process.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Pakistan's Lessons from its Kargil War 1999	Sumairs	Pakistan Affairs	7	Saturday, December 11, 2010 12:00 PM
The Kargil Conflict1999	Muskan Ghuman	References and Recommendations	0	Sunday, December 02, 2007 07:10 PM
Cartoon controversy an attack on Muslim religious spirit	Naseer Ahmed Chandio	Discussion	14	Sunday, February 26, 2006 04:03 AM

The Following User Says Thank You to MHMALIK For This Useful Post:
Ahmed_2007_Cool (Monday, September 19, 2011)