Thursday, March 29, 2012
|
 |
42nd CTP (PAAS)
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Multan
Posts: 569
Thanks: 475
Thanked 657 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahmad786Khan
The essence of two-nation theory and creation of Pakistan was that Muslim leadership felt that the Hindu majority, under western democracy, after attaining power, will draw the first blood by giving a blow to Muslim culture and heritage in India, which was their obvious right, because Muslims ruled by sword and imposed their socio-political system by enslaving the local population. The creation of Pakistan was not matter of any specific ideology or ijtehad, it was a matter of survival. Had India not been partitioned, we all would have been living a truly secular life and Islam for the Muslims of India would have only been a matter of prayers and fasting. Ideology of Pakistan was more inclined toward Jihad than Ijtehad, although it is very true that we lost our way and got lost in things which had nothing to do with our destiny but still we have a homeland of our own and we don't feel subdued by Hinduism or any other ism, Islam is our way of life and who knows time might come when we really become what Islam wants us to be and once we achieve what preachings of Muhammad(S.A.W) grants the human beings, the world will not only admire us but shall follow us.
|
Who told you that Muslims imposed their socio-political system by enslaving the local population???? dear bro don't you know about Adl-e-Jahangeer??? The reforms that Akbar introduced??? Akbar gave local hindus that much liberty that he even faced the criticism by Ulemas in the court...
If Muslims had imposed Islam by sword then the population of Hindus would have been much lesser or even extinct in the Hindustan.
|
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
Similar Threads
