Originally Posted by Arbab.Danish

@ Crown Prince.
And about this point "will our society will leap into the era of peace and prosperity?"

some days back some one in the thread of dividing Punjab into smaller provinces or renaming of NWFP asked the same thing. that will renaming bring prosperity and solve the problems. the same is here.
I want to ask, "did restoration of judges lead Pakistan to prosperity" did restoration of democracy or exit of Musharraf solved the problems?" "Will 18th Amendment solve all problems?" The answer to all this is certainly "BIG NO" SO by saying this all that everything is not ideal and that small things do bring small changes. BUt this does not mean that such small things not be done because they individually not leap our society to era of prosperity and peace. Here I am not saying this whether packages be banned or not, Although I am in favor of that. The purpose of saying all this was to explain that the argument you gave "about leap to era of prosperity " is not fit for any governmental act. then does it mean nothing should be done? not even release of missing persons solve the problems of Pakistan as whole. should that not be done? So instead of using magic of words, explain that with arguments based on simple words and not emotions.

Well I am really really sorry, although I tried my best to make my words light but it seems I could not. Please accept my Sorry in advance if my post created any annoyance but I assure you I did not mean that.

Originally Posted by Arbab.Danish

yes, no doubt they are very harmful and should be banned, at most 1 free hour and that too before 10 pm will be nice, or 1-2 hours only on weekends, because by this there will not be excess of anything, and secondly many students living in hostels have to call their parents at home. and same way some one who is doing job in some distant city also needs to talk to his family. but again not more than 1 hours daily, or 2-3 hours per week be allowed.

Originally Posted by arbab.danish

well there cant be just one solution for a problem. Yes i do agree with this that there must be a law censorship as it is in china or ksa. Which really helps people, parents from many bad things. But again as i mentioned earlier if one thing can't be achieved it does not mean that you should leave it. Small objectives have small targets. Banning or modifying night packages can solve some problems, so it should be, and by censoring internet contents may solve some problems so that too should be. For censorship on internet you may start an other thread for discussion about this, in order to adhere to the main topic.

@umarabbas
i do think that if some thing can not be achieved by majority of the parents by education and teaching then its not fault of parents but its fault of those things present in our surrounding which attract us and so they should be controlled by respective authorities.

And about co-education, academies, such things, we have to see the balance of pros and cons, and then decide. And also we have to see is that implementable, if not then how can that be done. Banning packages is implementable so it may be discussed, abolishing co-education, internet and etc is not implementable so no need to discuss. However some improvements can be introduced through some law or education