Friday, April 26, 2024
11:24 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > Sindh Public Service Commission > SPSC (CCE)

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #31  
Old Tuesday, July 05, 2011
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sindh
Posts: 230
Thanks: 55
Thanked 109 Times in 74 Posts
Babakhan is on a distinguished road
Default

18 officers sacked on charges of fraudulently passing SPSC
Posted by Suhail Akhtar
September 14, 2009

KARACHI: Sindh Department of Anti Corruption has started the scrutiny of the tempered records relating to Sindh Public Service Commission Examination-2003 while the Sindh government has sacked 18 officers upon detecting fraud in the compilation of final results.

The Anti Corruption Department has started the scrutiny of the scripts of the officers who had passed the exam through fraudulent means.

The SPSC has provided the relevant records to the inquiry officer.

A senior government official told Geo News that 18 out of 47 candidates have been removed from their posts after it was proved that they passed the exam through fraudulent means.

The Sindh government has forwarded the report against the candidates found involved in the scam to the Anti Corruption Department where case has been registered against former chairman Hasan Bhutto, Controller Examination Umer Roz, Secretary Aijaz Jafri and others on charges of corruption.


End of the Article

Sacking officers 18 officers straightaway and leaving remaining on Anti Corruption and courts to decide their fate after good 8 years can only happen in Sindh.Though it is an Old article but portrays correct mentality of our institutions. This type of behavior has destroyed many careers. By looking at this attitude of our institutions and Govt. I along with many others refused to join CCE 2008 batch because of its extreme level of uncertainty.

Above material is copied from below provided link:

18 officers sacked on charges of fraudulently passing SPSC
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old Wednesday, July 06, 2011
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sindh
Posts: 230
Thanks: 55
Thanked 109 Times in 74 Posts
Babakhan is on a distinguished road
Default

Ex-SPSC controller exams held over corruption charges


By Faraz Khan


KARACHI: The Anti-Corruption Establishment sleuths have arrested former Controller of Examinations of the Sindh Public Service Commission (SPSC) Muhammad Umar Zaur over charges of corruption, malpractices and tampering the records for the Combined Competitive Examinations-2003, held by the SPSC for various posts in the Sindh government.

The arrest of Zaur, a grade-19 officer of the SPSC, became possible after a request by Inquiries and Anti-Corruption Establishment (ACE) Chairman Munawar Opel was approved by Sindh Chief Secretary Fazalur Rehman in his capacity as chairman of the Anti-Corruption Committee-1, instead of going for an open inquiry as sufficient material was available on the record to go for the registration of a case, followed by arrest and prosecution in a competent court of law.

According to the record available, the SPSC had advertised for filling up the posts of deputy district officer, section officer, labour assistant director, cooperative societies assistant registrar, labour officer and ward rationing officer in the Sindh government in 2003, the exams of which were held between Dec 31, 2003 and Jan 12, 2004. The results were announced on April 10, 2004 and 531 candidates were declared successful in the written examinations, while after viva voce, 77 individuals were recommended to the government for appointment to any department for which the Combined Competitive Examinations were held. Following agitation in the media and by a candidate, the SPSC held a comprehensive inquiry through a three-member committee, headed by Shah Mansoor Alam, and assisted by Nawaz Leghari and Abrar Hussain Mirza.

Missing: Sources have disclosed that all answersheets of two candidates, who were declared successful, Ayhan Mustafa Bhutto and Dr Nisar Ahmad Leghari, were missing. The former is the son of the then SPSC chairman. Other favourites who benefited from the tampering of the records, misuse of authority, and missing of the records included Fawad Ghaffar Soomro, Shoaib Ahmad Khero, Ms Memona Shah, Imran Bhatti, Ali Anwar Ruk, Imran Qureshi, Raja Mustafa Ali, and Javed Daudpoto. These individuals were relatives and acquaintances of men who were in power back then.

The record of following candidates were willfully, deliberately and with bad intentions tampered by Zaur, in full knowledge of the then SPSC chairman: Fayyaz Hussain Abbassi, Ghulam Murtaza Memon, Ayhan Mustafa Bhutto (full papers missing), Imran Bhatti, Saifullah Abro, Nawaz Sooho, Mangrio Muhammad Yakub, Ali Gul Sanjarani, Ghulam Sarwar Uttero, Memona Shah, Thebo Muhammad Juman, Jehanzaib Abbas, Abdul Qadir Abbasi, Saeed Ahmad Shaikh, Ali Anwar Ruk, Kiran Shaikh, Sikandar Baloch, Muhammad Afzal, Mukhtiar Ahmad Mallah, Imran, Safia Naz Mangi, Muhammad Taufeeq, Riaz Ahmad Dahar, Mukhtiar Ahmad Shar, Shah Ihsanullah, Abdul Samad, Muhammad Khurram Mangi, Shabbir Ahmad Sethar, Irshad Khokhar, Ibrahim, Shoaib Ahmad Khero, Muhammad Saleem, Karamullah, Nosheen Usman, Syed Rizwan Ali, Muhammad Kamran Khan, Amjad Ali Arain, Zubair Ahmad Channa, Fuad Ghaffar Soomro, Aamir Zia Isran, Dr Nisar Ahmad Leghari (full papers missing), Kamran Ahmad Khero, Abdul Wahab Sario, Farooq Azam Abro, and Abro Sabir Ali.
It is interesting to note that 57 percent of the 77 successful candidates’ papers were missing or had been tampered with, while some had failed in compulsory subjects. Their marks were enhanced to be included in the successful candidates list by the former controller of examinations of the SPSC. The Sindh ACE believes that Zaur is possibly not the only person involved in the case, and more individuals would be nabbed once the accused is interrogated.

http://dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp...-9-2009_pg7_30


END OF THE ARTICLE

My questions and observation: Why following officers names and many others are included in the enquiry report by Anti Corruption Department and this inquiry is headed by Mr. Opal a DMG Officer. I asked this question to a Grade-16 senior officer in SPSC and he replied that if SPSC wants it can change a meritorious officer into a fraud by just throwing his copies in bin and labeled them fraudulent or temper the exam copies and call them that they have used illegal means for allocation. This culture is introduced by this current SPSC and made all future allocations uncertain as who will assure the batch of CCE 2008 that their paper will not be tampered after 10 years by another SPSC and they will not label us a fraud. Mr. Umar Opal (DMG) is a person good reputation but what he can do as a head of enquiry team if whole team of SPSC incharge tells the anti corruption that copies are altered. My second question is that who altered the copies SPSC under Mr. Bhutto's chairmanship or SPSC under Mr. Abbasi from PPP to consolidate their claim that all previous setups of SPSC were corrupt.

1. I personally know Juman Thebo (CSS qualifier), Saifullah Abro (Allocated in Accounts Group but opted DDO-R in Sindh Govt., Mukhtiar Ahmad Mallah (Section Officer and an extremely talented person who have written books helping CSS candidates and teaching at UQAIP CSS Academy.

2. Muhammad Nawaz Sohu (allocated as DDO-R in CCE-2003)
Joined DMG in 2003 through CSS

3. . Dr. Farrukh Habibani (allocated as DDO-R in CCE-2003)
Joined PSP in 2004 through CSS

4. Fayaz Hussain Abbasi (allocated as DDO-R in CCE-2003)
Joined DMG in 2005 through CSS

5. Attaullah Shah (allocated as DDO-R in CCE-2003)
Allocated in Pakistan Audit & Accounts Service through CSS but joined Sindh Govt as DDO-R

6. Jamshed Alam Memon (allocated as DDO-R in CCE-2003)
Qualified both written & viva voce of CSS-2001

7. Kamran Ahmed Qureshi (Allocated as DDO-R in CCE-2003)
Joined Pakistan Audit & Accounts Service through CSS & did not join Sindh Govt as DDO-R

8. Fayaz Hussain Jatoi (Allocated as DDO-R in CCE-2003)
Joined DMG through CSS in 2004

9. Saifullah Abro (Allocated as DDO-R in CCE-2003)
Joined Pakistan Audit & Accounts Service through CSS but later on joined Sindh Govt as DDO-R
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old Monday, July 18, 2011
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sindh
Posts: 230
Thanks: 55
Thanked 109 Times in 74 Posts
Babakhan is on a distinguished road
Default

A Section Officer of CCE 2003 batch told me today referring Mr. Ramzan Channa PSP (Present or former Secretary Anti Corruption Sindh) who signed the summary of Anti corruption sent to the Chief Secretary for further necessary action that CCE 2003 batch promotions are being withheld till the cases which are lodged within 6 months of the announcement of final result and pending at the end of Sindh Govt. are not resolved.

Why meritorious people have been suffering since last 08 years from the acts of few JALEE candidates and what will be the treatment with CCE 2008 batch as case against CCE 2008 is lodged in SHC within six months of the declaration of result?
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old Monday, September 05, 2011
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sindh
Posts: 230
Thanks: 55
Thanked 109 Times in 74 Posts
Babakhan is on a distinguished road
Default Bad News for CCE 2003

As per one Deputy Secretary at S&GAD the promotions of CCE 2003 batch are not even in consideration for any future promotions because of pending cases against them in court . After the disposal of cases against them, the data base of this batch will be prepared and ACRs and other performance reports will be collected. According to him after disposal of cases against CCE 2003 it will take almost 1-2 years for only arranging data and putting case file before authorities to call selection board. If CM likes than he will call for selection board. This is why I criticized the decision of CCE 2008 people to go against CM for offer letters. CM is the person who decides every thing even allowing the promotions to take place.

According to him this batch is already deprived of promotion for last 08 years and poor fellows will have to wait for another good 5 years for promotion to next grade if they are succeeded to save themselves from the Anti Corruption report requesting from authorities to expel them from their current positions.

We have such weaker administrative system in Sindh if case is pending in court or investigation is going on than promotions are stopped and cases are not even considered for promotion.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More Than 2000 Words to enhance Vocabulary Qurratulain English (Precis & Composition) 22 Saturday, June 13, 2020 01:55 PM
Observations on Performance of Candidates in Written Part of CSS Examination 2008 Last Island Subject Analysis 20 Saturday, November 26, 2011 01:37 PM
Observations on Performance of Candidates in Written Part of CSS Examination 2007 Last Island Subject Analysis 15 Tuesday, February 16, 2010 03:51 AM
Observations on Performance of Candidates in Written Part of CSS Examination 2006 Aarwaa Subject Analysis 0 Thursday, August 07, 2008 01:46 PM
Observations on performance of candidates in Written Part of CSS Examination 2005 Aarwaa Subject Analysis 4 Sunday, February 17, 2008 11:21 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.