Originally Posted by Lunatic bird

Yes standard of interviews was not of the level of combine competitive exam,but it was same for all.All of the candidates faced the same situation.I was taunted and laughed at twice or thrice by panel.when I answered most of the questions asked by chairman, bukhari and madam Narejo ,Bhatti started asking me questions from Urdu literature which was neither my optional nor I chose it in compulsory.They made my fun to test my nerves,I controlled my nerves and remained composed through out the interview.This is the story of almost every interviewee.
Of course,I feel sorry for those 15 to 20 friends whose scores are outstanding but they couldn't make their place in final allocations but this also a fact that more than 200 people with good scores have been successful.this happens even in css and PMS.
Another interesting thing,sindh govt is not helping cce 13 designates in this case.Instead,A.G sindh has spoiled our case from the very first day.Had the govt got their people allocated in these 227 ,it would have tried its level best to defend us in court.In last hearing,a counsel presented a list of 45 written qualified candidates who were relatives of politicians,members,high officials but couldn't make their place in final list.
One of the reasons of govt's such attitude towards us is the fact that its people are not among us.
Brother,most of the allocated candidates will happily go for reinterviews but again there is no certainity that new body will ensure merit.I believe,most of these 227 candidates belong to middle class families who spent years preparing for competitive exams.Many have resigned from their previous services after receiving offer orders for the posts allocated through cce 13, in case of reinterviews how can they be compensated?
I appreciate SC's efforts to set SPSC things on right path.At least, better things can be expected from SPSc from now onwards. On the matter of CCE 13,court should order something which may ensure merit and save time of aspirants.
Final judgment is expected in next week.

Originally Posted by Lunatic bird

Same old mantra of deliberately made failed in sindh essay and I.history.Each year thousands of aspirants are failed in English essay nd composition papers in css and pms .how abt them?aren't they deliberately failed?In CE 16, 94% candidates failed town planning and urban management.shouldn't their exam be reconducted?Brother,this slaughtering trend exists in all competitive exams ,CCE 13 is not an exception.
Nab's inquiry into cce13 related matters is in process,it would find out all the corrupt acts related to cce including ur claim of deliberately declaring u fail in Sindhi essay.Secondly,court has already checked copies and interview record of candidates.If there are even meagre signs of malpractice in process,lfinal judgement would certainly reflect them and the victims would be given chance.
Declaring exam null and void is a rare possibility.court wouldn't play with the future of those candidates who are comparatively ahead of others in this competitive exam.However,reinterviews will be the most likely if things go worst against final allocattees.

Originally Posted by Raja Bahar

Mr.Jumu Khan's daughter got 660 marks in written and there are so many other sourceful candidates who have 600 plus marks in written. Now even if you compete with them on viva voce basis you will not cross them. So what would you like to call them after all they have been qualified on a very distinct margin as compared to you Mr. Einstein.
Do you think that your argument is true that viva voce marking was not given on merit basis because a genius person like you couldn't be allocated while those who were declared intentionally failed in written are actually fail but they just cry on baseless and false basis!
Wow! You are such a genius person indeed!

Originally Posted by Raja Bahar

Dear colleagues my argument is simple that let's stand all together against these vultures on a single point agenda. That written part should be reconducted or even CCE 2013 under the patronage of ex-chairman justice Agha Rafique.
It's not a matter of failures but of merit and transparency.