Originally Posted by ProgressiveError

Please evaluate my piece of writing.

The Nearer the Church the Farther From God

By no means living nearer to a holy place is proportional to getting nearer to God. Conversely, living away from the church doesn't make any difference on relationship with God. This pure relationship is not a matter of outer world or physical presence. Rather it is the matter of soul - the soul - that is invisible yet very deep. It is the matter of heart - the heart - where the God resides.

Therefore, for strengthen a relation with God there is a need to work on inner self. There is a dire need to work on 'Self'. (Why redundancy?) As if one finds 'Self', recognizes the demands of soul and hear the voice of heart; is indeed successful in reaching God. It is irrespective of one’s living place.

Baba Bullay shah emphasized in his poetry that praying and worship is useless unless one truly feels a strong relationship with God. Islam says, "Acts depend on intentions" advocating that prayers are of no use until ones soul and heart are not willing for so. And this is only possible when one has a strong relation with his God. Staying inside or nearer to a holy place never guarantees a pure relationship with God as it starts from soul and heart and not from Church, Temple or Mosque.

Originally Posted by sajida11

All rules are made for the welfare of human being and they are liable to change when it bcomes obvious that they are not serving the pupose for which they are created.So these rules are not perpetual.Man has created these rules in order to regulate his conduct so he is also powerful to modify them.
with the passage of time every thing changes in order to cope with these changes men,s attitude and behaviour also changes .Since rules are made to regulate human bahaviour, so chnages in them are also inviteable. Rules are not perfect piece of paper bec they are man made and are liable to carry errors and imperfections ,which should be corrected with passage of time. Constitutions of countries just become piece of papers when their security is at risk by following them. For example US forign polocy is to support democratic governments of the economiacally weak countries but history reveals that most of us aid was given to pakistan during military rule. Because these military governmaents have done alot for america as compared to democratic governmaents.
So all rules are made by man for his welfare and security and he is liable to change them. these rules are made for human being and whnever it is percieved that any particular rule is going against their interest it is usually voilated or modified.

plz sceniors check my expansion.

Originally Posted by zindagi20

Future can never be predicted with perfect accuracy but it can be gauged by considering certain parameters. The similar reality is substantiated by the adage which implies that the personality of an individual can be envisaged by a cursory glance over his childhood. The personality of an adult is simply a product of traits and characteristics he exhibits in his younger age. His attributes are often the developments of the features he had when he was a child. As Milton has aptly pronounced, “The child shows the man, As morning shows the day”. Most of the qualities, be it physical, mental and social, ripe with the passage of time and are manifested in mature form in adulthood. It seems true that a child with positive traits and habits will emerge as a constructive member of the society while a child with negative predispositions will prove a curse in social terms.
The history bear witness to the fact, the childhood preferences and inclinations determine the man of future, by having many such personalities in its annals. Hazrat Muhammad (P. B. U. H), a great reformer, who changed the map of the world with his revolutionary thoughts, was equally a man of generosity and high acumen in his childhood. Similarly, Adolf Hitler harbored a stubborn child himself and he emerged as the most cruel man in the cosmos. Titian, an eminent Turkish artist, is another epitome of it. But the maxim does not always stand true and the existence of exception can never be denied.
In a nutshell, the childhood is a crucial phase of life and it must be dealt carefully on the part of the parents as it paves the way for future personality. The parents must pay heed to the temporal and moral training of the child to make him a productive organ of the society.

Originally Posted by zuhaib ahmed

Originally Posted by Ahmed Faisal

Can we have solved paper of last 15 years of Composition???

Originally Posted by ProgressiveError

Human history is witness, all the great achievements and all the huge successes that required continuous efforts and struggles. In early times, Rome was one of the great and successful empires of the world. However, it took centuries to bring Rome to that glorious status. None of adept works were achieved in days as there is no shortcut to success. Therefore, a continuous chain of nonstop efforts is needed to attain desired goals and objectives.

A bird constructs complex and sophisticated nest in days. Selecting a safe place, collecting specks from near and far, and arranging them to make a comfortable living place is a process of days. Nonetheless, it is a tiny task that requires hard work of days. Therefore to achieve higher aims, struggle and hard work is the key irrespective of days. There is no shortcut. Failures should not become hurdles in the journey of success. Rather, they should be taken as opportunities for further successes.

Originally Posted by ProgressiveError

for strengthen ------ strengthening ?
praying and worship ----- I should use only one of these two?
ones ----- one's ?
are not ---- is not?
his God ---- God?

Please confirm.