Thank you so much for your time and opinion. I'm grateful.

Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk

Bonapart! what do you mean by over all good work, is it out of danger zone means a satisfactory outline ?

Yes, out of danger zone. Wonderfully managed. To the point as well.

I don't think so.

That outline contains both arguments in favor and against the thesis. And even thesis is not explicitly written. One have to find it.

See the outlines of successful candidates, you would understand where I'm coming from.

Trust me this can bring grave consequence.

It is an " essay " where your whole and sole purpose is to defend your stance.

Not a current affairs' question where you must include every theory and perspective.

Negating yourself in the essay is not acceptable. It portrays lack of decisiveness.

Moreover, the paper checker is an English teacher not a scholar of political science, or any other subject. The same essay paper includes topics from a variety of areas. No matter which topic you choose, the main thing they look for is your ability to write as that others can comprehend you and you don't negate yourself... Qoutes, different types of examples etc are only required for boasting score...

But to cross the threshold of passing marks, simplicity, relevance and grammatical error free writing is all that is required.

Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk

__________________
One must be a wise reader to quote wisely and well; said Bronson Alcott

Brother you are right. I think it is not that much bad either, and the most important thing is; it depends upon examiner that how he will handle the paper under which mood or circumstances. There is no hard and fast rule which could guarantees someone to qualify essay paper. Infact there are some candidates who have done exceptionally well in their essay paper but failed; hence, we all are trying our best to take out those flaws which we feel likely to cause trouble. Besides, I personally welcome your opinion and you have right to present your suggestions.

Thank you

I agree with the point that I often mix positive and negative points of a topic in an essay but tell me, cannot we discuss the two sides of a picture in essay, as I did. I will try to improve my outline InshAllah.

World politics stands more derisive today than it had been ever before
Politics of dominant states today aims at dividing weaker nations and creating a fragmented society, easy to be ruled and plundered off its resources.
Introduction
The end of colonialism did not prove an end to the contest of power among giant nations. Indeed, it was the beginning of a system more complex and dangerous in its nature. The important aspect of the present system is no power can be directly blamed for the misery of the third world poor nations. While confronted with population rise, receding water resources, global warming and increased energy demands, the struggle, among sates, for maintaining central political and economic position has become much more precarious. The weaker states with substantial resources provided a productive ground to the bigger nations to play their game of power politics. The crisis in Afghanistan, Middle East and Gulf States, is a strong manifestation of the heartless political and economic policies of the world. The new face of political and economic contest, the neo colonialism, has made the life of the countries, having energy, resources, and important strategic positions, a hell.
Kwame Nkrumah described the present political system in beautiful word: ‘neo colonialism is the worst form of imperialism. For those who practice it, it means power without responsibility, and for those who suffer from it, it means exploitation without redress.’
OUTLINE
1.Turning point of politics

a.Rising power of human rights and surge of nationalism capped the possibility of colonialism in future.

b.End of imperialism was dealt with the emergence of new system ‘neo imperialism’.

c.New system provided the new definition of powerful state; powerful is the one who has the control of world’s markets and resources.

2Central economic position demands the control of economic resources

a.Rising energy demands of developed states and ensured supply of oil from Gulf States and Middle East
b. Agenda of developed states is an access to and control of world markets and raw materials
c.Unhindered supply of resources and control of trading routes; the struggle for control of strategic straits and canals is a plight of states encompassing these areas.

3.Changed political scenario and predicament of weaker states

a.Transformation of the nature of international rivalry; it has changed from direct military intervention and territorial control to indirect control of economy and internal policies of states.

b.Policies of WTO and IMF and the troubles of weaker economies

c.Inducement of the sectarian division among Middle Eastern nation to have an ensure supply of oil

d.Grounds of Syria, Yemen and Iraq are being exploited to advance the conflict between two powerful political blocs.

e.The peace and progress of Afghanistan and Pakistan was sacrificed at the altar of US national interest; the consequences of war against terrorism delivered a divided, poor and volatile region.

f.Heartless policies of world powers creating the fear of war, and resulting in an unending arms race at the expense of human development ; US-India nuclear deal and Pakistan’s steps for undermining this fear and resultant destabilization in region.

4.World’s advance towards clash of civilizations’, and role of international law and morality; Huntington’s and Monroe doctrine of US supremacy can lead the world to a disastrous course, where the struggle of power among powerful states can hit the world in most inhumane way .

5. International law and morality as defined by Morgenthau ‘ do not exist’

Conclusion
please evaluate it

M.Usman
MBA in finance
My optional
economics
business admin
Punjabi
agriculture and forestry
mercantile law
sub sa best thread yeh hai meri nazar mein.Aj mera sbp-ypip exam hai need wishes.

__________________
Few words are best.

THE VALUE OF DEMOCRACY AND THE FUTURE OF DEMOCRACY IN PAKISTAN


A) What are the Fundamental Democratic Values?

1) Democracy is a basic representation of the majority
2) Democratic society guarantees fundamental rights
3) Democratic values pertain to masses for greater autonomy
4) Democratic societies flourish with their right to say

B) FUTURE OF PAKISTAN IS ON THE ROAD TO A DEMOCRATIC STATE

1) Pakistan is heading towards prosperity by implementing the Constitution
2) Viability of Article 25 of Fundamental Rights and Equality of Law in Pakistan
3) Civil-Military leadership are in the arena of Public debate without violence
4) Restoration of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan after decade old infringement by previous military regimes
5) Article 245, Functions of Armed Forces and their support for civilian government in-case of adversity
6) Functionality of Law enforcement agencies to carry out tasks independently
7) Prime Minister speech about Minorities in the light of Article 36 of Constitution
8) Recent speech by Chief Justice of Pakistan emphasis government to solidify promotion of social justice and eradication of social evils
9) ISPR statement over inadequate governance shows the strength of democratic state by discarding coup
10) Neglected Balochistan and now its reconciliation policy depicts the true spirit of democratic Pakistan
11) Provinces with 18th amendment could be able to make policies independently

C) Remedial measures to further solidify the future of democracy in Pakistan.

1) Expedite the process of civil cases under swift Justice system
2) Inviolability of the Constitution must be entrenched in grass root level in Pakistan
3) Efforts should be made to eliminate exploitation and eradication of social evils
4) Enhance the co-operation between pillars of state to guarantee stability.
5) Uniformity of education must be ensured to strengthen free democratic society
6) Regulatory of electronic media under the code of ethics should perform their duties under democratic structure

Conclusion

If you were to appear in an essay competition than you could do that,

Where you could present the view point of the opposite side and negate it by arguments.

But why make it so complicated when we know that it is risky.

But NO, not in CSS.

What's the point of one's intelligence if one cannot identify and than play by their rules.

No wonder, these so called exceptional essay writers fail because they want to play with their own rules.

And you dont need to worry because you are rich in expression and willing to improve yourself.

Let's hope and pray that all of us make through ce16. IA

Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk

__________________
One must be a wise reader to quote wisely and well; said Bronson Alcott