Friday, May 03, 2024
11:28 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Datesheets and Results > Previous CSS Results and Datesheets > CSS 2009 Exam
CE-2009 Result and Problem in system CE-2009 Result and Problem in system

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
Page 4 of 9 123 4 5678 Last »
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #31  
Old Saturday, June 19, 2010
Xeric's Avatar
Provincial Civil Service
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: PMS / PCS Award: Serving PMS / PCS (BS 17) officers are eligible only. - Issue reason: Diligent Service Medal: Awarded upon completion of 5 years of dedicated services and contribution to the community. - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,639
Thanks: 430
Thanked 2,335 Times in 569 Posts
Xeric is a bearer of wisdomXeric is a bearer of wisdomXeric is a bearer of wisdomXeric is a bearer of wisdomXeric is a bearer of wisdomXeric is a bearer of wisdomXeric is a bearer of wisdomXeric is a bearer of wisdomXeric is a bearer of wisdomXeric is a bearer of wisdomXeric is a bearer of wisdom
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by kukikhel View Post

And brother how could I come up with any evidence, but the cancellation of result is in itself and evidence to all such discripencies. The demotion of some candidates another evidence, and sorrows of some very talented fellows another and the list goes on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raz View Post
This is the main factor which proves Kukikhel's point of view.
I think cancellation of result by itself proves the credibility of FPSC. There were blunders/mistakes in previous result and flaws removed hence result is clear isn't it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kukikhel View Post
I am dog-tired, running out of thoughts.

It is a temporary detour, not a dead end.
__________________
No matter how fast i run or how far i go it wont escape me, pain, misery, emptiness.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Xeric For This Useful Post:
fromQAU (Saturday, June 19, 2010)
  #32  
Old Saturday, June 19, 2010
Senior Member
Qualifier: Awarded to those Members who cleared css written examination - Issue reason: CE 2009 - Roll no 7322
  
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 80
Thanks: 35
Thanked 50 Times in 28 Posts
kukikhel is on a distinguished road
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crown Prince View Post
I think cancellation of result by itself proves the credibility of FPSC. There were blunders/mistakes in previous result and flaws removed hence result is clear isn't it?
Nopes,, it makes it more dubious. It could be a mere action on their part just to deter questions on their reliability. Anyway, this discussion could lead us to nowhere. ALLAH knows better. Buit it was really out of way.
__________________
We have to distrust each other. It is our only defence against betrayal...
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kukikhel For This Useful Post:
  #33  
Old Saturday, June 19, 2010
Junior Member
  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 16
Thanks: 1
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
ana mughal is on a distinguished road
Unhappy shocking
Hi its quite shocking to hear about these blunders in result.but I have given css 2010 exams and i hav got disappointed to know about that.can any one guide me when result of css 2010 will come?any solid date about result declaration????????pta n hmare sath kya ho ga
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old Saturday, June 19, 2010
38th CTP (DMG)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2009 - Merit 253
  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: karachi
Posts: 59
Thanks: 9
Thanked 37 Times in 25 Posts
samiullah shaikh is on a distinguished road
Default
its very dis-appointing to see that some candidates are questioning the credibility of not only FPSC but all those candidates who have performed well and have got good marks .....

every candidate has been through the same checking criteria...... this is what competition is all about.......
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to samiullah shaikh For This Useful Post:
fromQAU (Saturday, June 19, 2010)
  #35  
Old Saturday, June 19, 2010
Senior Member
Qualifier: Awarded to those Members who cleared css written examination - Issue reason: CE 2009 - Roll no 7322
  
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 80
Thanks: 35
Thanked 50 Times in 28 Posts
kukikhel is on a distinguished road
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by samiullah shaikh View Post
its very dis-appointing to see that some candidates are questioning the credibility of not only FPSC but all those candidates who have performed well and have got good marks .....

every candidate has been through the same checking criteria...... this is what competition is all about.......
Man do not take it personally. We also admit that "every candidate has been through the same criteria and this is what competition is all about". However competition must be transparent and shall not be as scandalous as 09.

The way it disappoints you, you shall also look at the other side of the coin. Many brilliant candidates had pinned their hopes to this result and no one could be just out of his mind for the sake of fun, but because they are feeling bad about it. Every person has equal right to complain if anything bad happens to him/her. Or else Pakistan is like Orwell's Animal Farm. But its only FPSC for which we held reverence as a sole transparent recruiting institution.

Congrats on ur success!
__________________
We have to distrust each other. It is our only defence against betrayal...
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kukikhel For This Useful Post:
Artemis (Saturday, June 19, 2010), Raz (Saturday, June 19, 2010)
  #36  
Old Saturday, June 19, 2010
fromQAU's Avatar
40th CTP (OMG)
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2011 - Merit 333
  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 471
Thanks: 334
Thanked 459 Times in 259 Posts
fromQAU will become famous soon enoughfromQAU will become famous soon enough
Thumbs up
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crown Prince View Post
I think cancellation of result by itself proves the credibility of FPSC. There were blunders/mistakes in previous result and flaws removed hence result is clear isn't it?



It is a temporary detour, not a dead end.


i agree with u crown prince.
but i hv observed that this result is being highly appreciated by those who hv got good positions and so equally criticised by those who are not ready to accept the reality that they are outclassed.i m 100% sure that FPSC did well by taking notice of the errors and revising it with more transparency.
__________________
Recite a Darood Shareef at least once and now.
(RAFIQUE AHMED KHOKHAR)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to fromQAU For This Useful Post:
  #37  
Old Saturday, June 19, 2010
wraith's Avatar
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: in my world
Posts: 103
Thanks: 36
Thanked 100 Times in 59 Posts
wraith is on a distinguished road
Post
in my opinion the fpsc is a sacred institution, free from any sort of corruption. it has revised the merit list to exclude the errors.

i think people who are below in the merit list could not perform well in written or oral portion, so they must accept the result and not cry over split milk. they can prepare well for next attempt. after all CSS is not the end of the world.
__________________
Ability is nothing without opportunity.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to wraith For This Useful Post:
fromQAU (Saturday, June 19, 2010)
  #38  
Old Saturday, June 19, 2010
shallowwater's Avatar
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: Qualifier: Awarded to those Members who cleared css written examination - Issue reason: CE 2011 - Roll no 1127
  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Faisalabad
Posts: 845
Thanks: 249
Thanked 876 Times in 334 Posts
shallowwater is a name known to allshallowwater is a name known to allshallowwater is a name known to allshallowwater is a name known to allshallowwater is a name known to allshallowwater is a name known to all
Default
I think we must show sportsman spirit and accept the result. This is what competition is all about. This is for the first time that they have mentioned the total marks alongwith the merit numbers. So what else do we want? But one thing FPSC must do is that the number of seats must be raised. Atleast 450 people should be allocated out of 900. Till 2007 there was a shortage of candidates and now they should fulfill that shortage by allocating at least half of the candidates. In 2008, 353 were allocated out of 684 pass candidates. So this time again 450 should get allocation.
__________________
CSS 2009, 2010, 2011 Qualifier
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old Saturday, June 19, 2010
Farish's Avatar
Member
Qualifier: Awarded to those Members who cleared css written examination - Issue reason: CE 2009 - Roll no 918
  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lahore
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 18 Posts
Farish is on a distinguished road
Default
@shallowwater

I still think that there are sound resons to object the result .. There are a number of candidates who had appeared for the 2nd or the 3rd time in 2009 exams .. they know what they are capable of ... they know what they did in their last attempts and what marks they got that time ... I fully agree that at times luck also plays its role but how can hundreds of candidates be victims of this so called bad luck ...??????
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Farish For This Useful Post:
deovolente (Saturday, June 19, 2010)
  #40  
Old Saturday, June 19, 2010
Junior Member
Qualifier: Awarded to those Members who cleared css written examination - Issue reason: CE 2009 - Roll no 3343
  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lahore
Posts: 27
Thanks: 8
Thanked 39 Times in 17 Posts
deovolente is on a distinguished road
Default
I reinforce the viewpoint expressed by FARISH. It was my second attempt to qualify the written portion with 444th position, while in ce-08 i stood at 309th all over pakistan. I know the difference very well between the two attempts. My heart is not ready to accept the result. It is not I only, but countless of very competent candidates seem to have been disappointed over the CE-09 RESULT. Those who have secured good positions are consoling the rest to accept the result. At least, I ll not acquiese it.! Are the people in FPSC angels? are they exception to being Pakistanis? If one or two persons are disenchanted, they are certainly illusioned, but when many are dissatified, we cannot reject the 'voxpopuli vox dei' !
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to deovolente For This Useful Post:
Raz (Saturday, June 19, 2010), theelegant444 (Sunday, June 20, 2010)
Reply
Page 4 of 9 123 4 5678 Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
G.K objectives for all terminator Topics and Notes 18 Friday, January 21, 2022 01:35 AM
Pakistan's History From 1947-till present Sumairs Pakistan Affairs 13 Sunday, October 27, 2019 02:55 PM
Solved Everyday Science Papers Dilrauf General Science & Ability 4 Friday, April 08, 2011 06:10 PM
Influence of joint family system on socio-economic development of Pakistan hanif.sadia News & Articles 0 Tuesday, February 16, 2010 01:58 PM
The Pakistan Council of Research in Water Resources free thinker Pakistan Affairs 1 Tuesday, April 25, 2006 08:05 AM

CSS Forum - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top

CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.